Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Advances in quantum chemistry

Conundrums in Chemical Physics

Dennis Caldwell

Published Jan 1, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-12-408099-7.00002-7

Related papers

New perspectives in theoretical chemical physics

Erkki Brändas

Advances in quantum chemistry•Jan 1, 2003•2 citations

The Quantum Mechanics Conundrum

Gennaro Auletta

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2019•5 citations

Resolving conundrums in lasing without inversion via exact solutions to simple models

Marlan O. Scully

Aspects of lasing without inversion (LWI) have been the subject of spirited debate. Analytical solutions are here presented which provide a useful tool for resolving many of the conundrums and also provide new insights into the physics of the problem. The presentation is written for the student with some background in laser physics but not LWI. Some of the material is therefore in the nature of a review.

Quantum Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Aug 1, 1994•55 citations

An operational perspective on the Magnus–Fer conundrum in time-dependent quantum mechanics

Kuntal Mukherjee, Shreyan Ganguly, Ramesh Ramachandran

The development of analytic methods for studying quantum systems driven by periodic Hamiltonians has remained an active pursuit for gaining insights into physical phenomena in spectroscopy and other related areas in chemical physics. From a theoretical perspective, the success of a given analytic method relies on the operational aspects as well as its exactness in replicating (known) experimental results. While analytic methods built around the Magnus expansion (ME) scheme have been preferred in time-evolution studies, the splitting of the time-propagator into a product of exponential operators in the Fer expansion (FE) scheme has gained wider attention in recent years. To this end, the operational advantages of one scheme over the other have always remained contentious and form the basis for the present report. Employing periodic Hamiltonians as examples, the operational aspects and the relative merits/demerits of the two methods are analyzed, and their long-term/short-term behavior is discussed through analytic expressions in experimentally verifiable systems.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Apr 2, 2025•0 citations

Models and paradoxes in quantum chemistry

C. K. J�rgensen

Theoretical Chemistry Accounts•Jan 1, 1974•20 citations

Quantum Particle Physics and the Skirting of Unresolved Conundrums

Bruce A. Lutgen

The study of quantum particle physics has been going on for a relatively long time. The chase was and is on to reduce the innate particles, which make up all things considered matter, to their most fundamental forms. The question is have we gotten ahead of ourselves?

•Jun 1, 2019•0 citations
The development of analytic methods for studying quantum systems driven by periodic Hamiltonians has remained an active pursuit for gaining insights into physical phenomena in spectroscopy and other related areas in chemical physics. From a theoretical perspective, the success of a given analytic method relies on the operational aspects as well as its exactness in replicating (known) experimental results. While analytic methods built around the Magnus expansion (ME) scheme have been preferred in time-evolution studies, the splitting of the time-propagator into a product of exponential operators in the Fer expansion (FE) scheme has gained wider attention in recent years. To this end, the operational advantages of one scheme over the other have always remained contentious and form the basis for the present report. Employing periodic Hamiltonians as examples, the operational aspects and the relative merits/demerits of the two methods are analyzed, and their long-term/short-term behavior is discussed through analytic expressions in experimentally verifiable systems.