Practically good error-correcting codes should have good parameters and efficient decoding algorithms. Some algebraically defined good codes, such as cyclic codes, Reed–Solomon codes, and Reed–Muller codes, have nice decoding algorithms. However, many optimal linear codes do not have an efficient decoding algorithm except for the general syndrome decoding which requires a lot of memory. Therefore, a natural question to ask is which optimal linear codes have an efficient decoding. We show that two binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] linear codes and two binary optimal [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes have an efficient decoding algorithm. There was no known efficient decoding algorithm for the binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes. We project them onto the much shorter length linear [ 9 , 5 , 4 ] and [ 10 , 6 , 4 ] codes over G F ( 4 ) , respectively. This decoding algorithm, called projection decoding, can correct errors of weight up to 3. These [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes respectively have more codewords than any optimal self-dual [ 36 , 18 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 20 , 8 ] codes for given length and minimum weight, implying that these codes are more practical.Practically good error-correcting codes should have good parameters and efficient decoding algorithms. Some algebraically defined good codes, such as cyclic codes, Reed–Solomon codes, and Reed–Muller codes, have nice decoding algorithms. However, many optimal linear codes do not have an efficient decoding algorithm except for the general syndrome decoding which requires a lot of memory. Therefore, a natural question to ask is which optimal linear codes have an efficient decoding. We show that two binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] linear codes and two binary optimal [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes have an efficient decoding algorithm. There was no known efficient decoding algorithm for the binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes. We project them onto the much shorter length linear [ 9 , 5 , 4 ] and [ 10 , 6 , 4 ] codes over G F ( 4 ) , respectively. This decoding algorithm, called projection decoding, can correct errors of weight up to 3. These [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes respectively have more codewords than any optimal self-dual [ 36 , 18 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 20 , 8 ] codes for given length and minimum weight, implying that these codes are more practical.

arXiv:1911.07212MathematicsDec 19, 20191 citation

Decoding Methods for Linear Codes

Kenny Barrese

Jun 4, 20080 citations

Low Complexity Linear Programming Decoding of Nonbinary Linear Codes

Mayur Punekar, Mark F. Flanagan

Linear Programming (LP) decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes has attracted much attention in the research community in the past few years. The aim of LP decoding is to develop an algorithm which has error-correcting performance similar to that of the Sum-Product (SP) decoding algorithm, while at the same time it should be amenable to mathematical analysis. The LP decoding algorithm has also been extended to nonbinary linear codes by Flanagan et al. However, the most important problem with LP decoding for both binary and nonbinary linear codes is that the complexity of standard LP solvers such as the simplex algorithm remain prohibitively large for codes of moderate to large block length. To address this problem, Vontobel et al. proposed a low complexity LP decoding algorithm for binary linear codes which has complexity linear in the block length. In this paper, we extend the latter work and propose a low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. We use the LP formulation proposed by Flanagan et al. as a basis and derive a pair of primal-dual LP formulations. The dual LP is then used to develop the low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. In contrast to the binary low-complexity LP decoding algorithm, our proposed algorithm is not directly related to the nonbinary SP algorithm. Nevertheless, the complexity of the proposed algorithm is linear in the block length and is limited mainly by the maximum check node degree. As a proof of concept, we also present a simulation result for a $[80,48]$ LDPC code defined over $\mathbb{Z}_4$ using quaternary phase-shift keying over the AWGN channel, and we show that the error-correcting performance of the proposed LP decoding algorithm is similar to that of the standard LP decoding using the simplex solver.Linear Programming (LP) decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes has attracted much attention in the research community in the past few years. The aim of LP decoding is to develop an algorithm which has error-correcting performance similar to that of the Sum-Product (SP) decoding algorithm, while at the same time it should be amenable to mathematical analysis. The LP decoding algorithm has also been extended to nonbinary linear codes by Flanagan et al. However, the most important problem with LP decoding for both binary and nonbinary linear codes is that the complexity of standard LP solvers such as the simplex algorithm remain prohibitively large for codes of moderate to large block length. To address this problem, Vontobel et al. proposed a low complexity LP decoding algorithm for binary linear codes which has complexity linear in the block length. In this paper, we extend the latter work and propose a low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. We use the LP formulation proposed by Flanagan et al. as a basis and derive a pair of primal-dual LP formulations. The dual LP is then used to develop the low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. In contrast to the binary low-complexity LP decoding algorithm, our proposed algorithm is not directly related to the nonbinary SP algorithm. Nevertheless, the complexity of the proposed algorithm is linear in the block length and is limited mainly by the maximum check node degree. As a proof of concept, we also present a simulation result for a $[80,48]$ LDPC code defined over $\mathbb{Z}_4$ using quaternary phase-shift keying over the AWGN channel, and we show that the error-correcting performance of the proposed LP decoding algorithm is similar to that of the standard LP decoding using the simplex solver.

arXiv:1007.1368Jul 8, 20100 citations

Suboptimal Decoding of Linear Codes

Ilya I. Dumer

Springer eBooksJan 1, 19939 citations

Decoder for Linear Codes

Luigi Paura

Jan 1, 20110 citations

Low complexity Linear Programming decoding of nonbinary linear codes

Mayur Punekar, Mark F. Flanagan

Linear Programming (LP) decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes has attracted much attention in the research community in the past few years. The aim of LP decoding is to develop an algorithm which has error-correcting performance similar to that of the Sum-Product (SP) decoding algorithm, while at the same time it should be amenable to mathematical analysis. The LP decoding algorithm has been derived for both binary and nonbinary decoding frameworks. However, the most important problem with LP decoding for both binary and nonbinary linear codes is that the complexity of standard LP solvers such as the simplex algorithm remain prohibitively large for codes of moderate to large block length. To address this problem, Vontobel et al. proposed a low complexity LP decoding algorithm for binary linear codes which has complexity linear in the block length. In this paper, we extend the latter work and propose a low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. We use the LP formulation for the nonbinary codes as a basis and derive a pair of primal-dual LP formulations. The dual LP is then used to develop the low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. The complexity of the proposed algorithm is linear in the block length and is limited mainly by the maximum check node degree. As a proof of concept, we also present a simulation result for a [80, 48] LDPC code defined over ℤ4using quaternary phase-shift keying over the AWGN channel, and we show that the error-correcting performance of the proposed LP decoding algorithm is similar to that of the standard LP decoding using the simplex solver.Linear Programming (LP) decoding of Low-Density Parity-Check (LDPC) codes has attracted much attention in the research community in the past few years. The aim of LP decoding is to develop an algorithm which has error-correcting performance similar to that of the Sum-Product (SP) decoding algorithm, while at the same time it should be amenable to mathematical analysis. The LP decoding algorithm has been derived for both binary and nonbinary decoding frameworks. However, the most important problem with LP decoding for both binary and nonbinary linear codes is that the complexity of standard LP solvers such as the simplex algorithm remain prohibitively large for codes of moderate to large block length. To address this problem, Vontobel et al. proposed a low complexity LP decoding algorithm for binary linear codes which has complexity linear in the block length. In this paper, we extend the latter work and propose a low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. We use the LP formulation for the nonbinary codes as a basis and derive a pair of primal-dual LP formulations. The dual LP is then used to develop the low-complexity LP decoding algorithm for nonbinary linear codes. The complexity of the proposed algorithm is linear in the block length and is limited mainly by the maximum check node degree. As a proof of concept, we also present a simulation result for a [80, 48] LDPC code defined over ℤ4using quaternary phase-shift keying over the AWGN channel, and we show that the error-correcting performance of the proposed LP decoding algorithm is similar to that of the standard LP decoding using the simplex solver.

Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and ComputingSep 1, 20108 citations

[80,48]

LDPC code defined over

\mathbb{Z}_4

using quaternary phase-shift keying over the AWGN channel, and we show that the error-correcting performance of the proposed LP decoding algorithm is similar to that of the standard LP decoding using the simplex solver.