Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Binary Linear Codes That Are Optimal for Error Correction

Torleiv Kløve

Published Jan 1, 2006• 3 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/11889342_75

Related papers

Linear Binary Error Correcting Codes with Specified Minimum Hamming Distance

Dr.Abbas Fadhil Al-Hashemi

Journal of Baghdad College of Economic sciences University•Jan 1, 2014•0 citations

Projection Decoding of Some Binary Optimal Linear Codes of Lengths 36 and 40

Lucky Galvez, Jon-Lark Kim

Practically good error-correcting codes should have good parameters and efficient decoding algorithms. Some algebraically defined good codes, such as cyclic codes, Reed–Solomon codes, and Reed–Muller codes, have nice decoding algorithms. However, many optimal linear codes do not have an efficient decoding algorithm except for the general syndrome decoding which requires a lot of memory. Therefore, a natural question to ask is which optimal linear codes have an efficient decoding. We show that two binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] linear codes and two binary optimal [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes have an efficient decoding algorithm. There was no known efficient decoding algorithm for the binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes. We project them onto the much shorter length linear [ 9 , 5 , 4 ] and [ 10 , 6 , 4 ] codes over G F ( 4 ) , respectively. This decoding algorithm, called projection decoding, can correct errors of weight up to 3. These [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes respectively have more codewords than any optimal self-dual [ 36 , 18 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 20 , 8 ] codes for given length and minimum weight, implying that these codes are more practical.

arXiv:1911.07212•Mathematics•Dec 19, 2019•1 citation

Binary Polarization Kernels from Code Decompositions

Noam Presman, Shapira, Ofer, Simon N. Litsyn +2 more

In this paper, code decompositions (a.k.a. code nestings) are used to design binary polarization kernels. The proposed kernels are in general non-linear. They provide a better polarization exponent than the previously known kernels of the same dimensions. In particular, non-linear kernels of dimensions 14, 15, and 16 are constructed and are shown to have optimal asymptotic error-correction performance. The optimality is proved by showing that the exponents of these kernels achieve a new upper bound that is developed in this paper.

arXiv:1410.8433•Oct 30, 2014•0 citations

Error Correcting Ability of Linear Block Codes

辰一 小島

群馬大学教育学部紀要. 自然科学編•Jan 1, 1989•0 citations

Error-Correction Capability of Binary Linear Codes

Tor Helleseth, Torleiv Kløve, V.I. Levenshtein

The monotone structure of correctable and uncorrectable errors given by the complete decoding for a binary linear code is investigated. New bounds on the error-correction capability of linear codes beyond half the minimum distance are presented, both for the best codes and for arbitrary codes under some restrictions on their parameters. It is proved that some known codes of low rate are as good as the best codes in an asymptotic sense.

IEEE Transactions on Information Theory•Apr 1, 2005•30 citations

Efficient decoder design for error correction codes

Jinjin He

•Apr 19, 2010•1 citation
Practically good error-correcting codes should have good parameters and efficient decoding algorithms. Some algebraically defined good codes, such as cyclic codes, Reed–Solomon codes, and Reed–Muller codes, have nice decoding algorithms. However, many optimal linear codes do not have an efficient decoding algorithm except for the general syndrome decoding which requires a lot of memory. Therefore, a natural question to ask is which optimal linear codes have an efficient decoding. We show that two binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] linear codes and two binary optimal [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes have an efficient decoding algorithm. There was no known efficient decoding algorithm for the binary optimal [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes. We project them onto the much shorter length linear [ 9 , 5 , 4 ] and [ 10 , 6 , 4 ] codes over G F ( 4 ) , respectively. This decoding algorithm, called projection decoding, can correct errors of weight up to 3. These [ 36 , 19 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 22 , 8 ] codes respectively have more codewords than any optimal self-dual [ 36 , 18 , 8 ] and [ 40 , 20 , 8 ] codes for given length and minimum weight, implying that these codes are more practical.
In this paper, code decompositions (a.k.a. code nestings) are used to design binary polarization kernels. The proposed kernels are in general non-linear. They provide a better polarization exponent than the previously known kernels of the same dimensions. In particular, non-linear kernels of dimensions 14, 15, and 16 are constructed and are shown to have optimal asymptotic error-correction performance. The optimality is proved by showing that the exponents of these kernels achieve a new upper bound that is developed in this paper.