Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Theoretical Computer Science

Exact results for accepting probabilities of quantum automata

Andris Ambainis, Arnolds Ķikusts

Published Feb 1, 2003• 20 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/s0304-3975(02)00393-6

Related papers

Exact Results for Accepting Probabilities of Quantum Automata

Andris Ambainis, Arnolds Ķikusts

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2001•2 citations

Probabilities to Accept Languages by Quantum Finite Automata

Andris Ambainis, Richard Bonner, Rūsiņš Freivalds +1 more

arXiv:quant-ph/9904066•Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 1999•35 citations

Regular Languages Accepted by Quantum Automata

Alberto Bertoni, Marco Carpentieri

Information and Computation•Mar 1, 2001•54 citations

Lower Bounds on the Size of Quantum Automata Accepting Unary Languages

Alberto Bertoni, Carlo Mereghetti, Beatrice Palano

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2003•8 citations

Exact results for accepting probabilities of quantum automata

Andris Ambainis, Arnolds Ķikusts

One of the properties of Kondacs-Watrous model of quantum finite automata (QFA) is that the probability of the correct answer for a QFA cannot be amplified arbitrarily. In this paper, we determine the maximum probabilities achieved by QFAs for several languages. In particular, we show that any language that is not recognized by an RFA (reversible finite automaton) can be recognized by a QFA with probability at most 0.7726...

arXiv:quant-ph/0109136•Sep 26, 2001•0 citations

Potential of Quantum Finite Automata with Exact Acceptance

Jozef Gruska, Daowen Qiu, Shenggen Zheng

The potential of the exact quantum information processing is an interesting, important and intriguing issue. For examples, it has been believed that quantum tools can provide significant, that is larger than polynomial, advantages in the case of exact quantum computation only, or mainly, for problems with very special structures. We will show that this is not the case. In this paper the potential of quantum finite automata producing outcomes not only with a (high) probability, but with certainty (so called exactly) is explored in the context of their uses for solving promise problems and with respect to the size of automata. It is shown that for solving particular classes [Formula: see text] of promise problems, even those without some very special structure, that succinctness of the exact quantum finite automata under consideration, with respect to the number of (basis) states, can be very small (and constant) though it grows proportional to [Formula: see text] in the case deterministic finite automata (DFAs) of the same power are used. This is here demonstrated also for the case that the component languages of the promise problems solvable by DFAs are non-regular. The method used can be applied in finding more exact quantum finite automata or quantum algorithms for other promise problems.

arXiv:1404.1689•International Journal of Foundations of Computer Science•Apr 1, 2015•31 citations
The potential of the exact quantum information processing is an interesting, important and intriguing issue. For examples, it has been believed that quantum tools can provide significant, that is larger than polynomial, advantages in the case of exact quantum computation only, or mainly, for problems with very special structures. We will show that this is not the case. In this paper the potential of quantum finite automata producing outcomes not only with a (high) probability, but with certainty (so called exactly) is explored in the context of their uses for solving promise problems and with respect to the size of automata. It is shown that for solving particular classes [Formula: see text] of promise problems, even those without some very special structure, that succinctness of the exact quantum finite automata under consideration, with respect to the number of (basis) states, can be very small (and constant) though it grows proportional to [Formula: see text] in the case deterministic finite automata (DFAs) of the same power are used. This is here demonstrated also for the case that the component languages of the promise problems solvable by DFAs are non-regular. The method used can be applied in finding more exact quantum finite automata or quantum algorithms for other promise problems.