Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

理论物理通讯：英文版

Comment on ＂Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for Different Distance Measures

高云峰, 冯健

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

We make comments on the conclusions of the paper:'Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for DifferentDistance Measures' [Commun.Theor.Phys.53 (2010)635],and give a physical example to describe the non-equivalenceof the fidelity and the trace distance.We prove that the fidelity is not more sensitive to a quantum operation than thetrace distance.

Related papers

Comment on “Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for Different Distance Measures"

Gao Yun-feng, Jian Qiang Feng

We make comments on the conclusions of the paper: “Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for Different Distance Measures" [ Commun. Theor. Phys. 53 (2010) 635 ], and give a physical example to describe the non-equivalence of the fidelity and the trace distance. We prove that the fidelity is not more sensitive to a quantum operation than the trace distance.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Nov 1, 2011•0 citations

Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for Different Distance Measures

Zhihao Ma, Wang Miao-Yin

In this paper, we compare the quantum operation sensitivity for different distance measures. We find that, among all usual distance measures, Bures fidelity is more sensitive to quantum operation than others. This may explain in some sense why fidelity is so useful in quantum information theory.

Communications in Theoretical Physics•Apr 1, 2010•2 citations

Bound on trace distance based on superfidelity

Zbigniew Puchała, Jarosław Adam Miszczak

We provide a bound for the trace distance between two quantum states. The lower bound is based on the superfidelity, which provides the upper bound on quantum fidelity. One of the advantages of the presented bound is that it can be estimated using a simple measurement procedure. We also compare this bound with the one provided in terms of fidelity.

arXiv:0811.2323•Physical Review A•Feb 5, 2009•24 citations

Fidelity and trace-norm distances for quantifying coherence

Lian-He Shao, Zhengjun Xi, Heng Fan +1 more

We investigate the coherence measures induced by fidelity and trace norm, based on the coherence quantification recently proposed by Baumgratz et al. [T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)]. We show that the fidelity of coherence does not in general satisfy the monotonicity requirement as a measure of coherence under the subselection of the measurement condition. We find that the trace norm of coherence can act as a measure of coherence for qubits and some special class of qutrits with some restrictions on the incoherent operators, while the general case needs to be explored further.

arXiv:1410.8327•Physical Review A•Apr 15, 2015•272 citations

Trace distance from the viewpoint of quantum operation techniques

Alexey E. Rastegin

As it is well known, the trace distance is very useful metric on quantum states. In the present paper this measure is exposed within the quantum operations formalism. Consistent proofs of its considerable properties are given. Relations between trace distance and sine distance are discussed.

•May 19, 2006•11 citations

Environment-invariant measure of distance between evolutions of an open quantum system

Matthew D Grace, Jason Dominy, Robert L. Kosut +2 more

The problem of quantifying the difference between evolutions of an open quantum system (in particular, between the actual evolution of an open system and the ideal target operation on the corresponding closed system) is important in quantum control, especially in control of quantum information processing. Motivated by this problem, we develop a measure for evaluating the distance between unitary evolution operators of a composite quantum system that consists of a sub-system of interest (e.g. a quantum information processor) and environment. The main characteristic of this measure is the invariance with respect to the effect of the evolution operator on the environment, which follows from an equivalence relation that exists between unitary operators acting on the composite system, when the effect on only the sub-system of interest is considered. The invariance to the environment's transformation makes it possible to quantitatively compare the evolution of an open quantum system and its closed counterpart. The distance measure also determines the fidelity bounds of a general quantum channel (a completely positive and trace-preserving map acting on the sub-system of interest) with respect to a unitary target transformation. This measure is also independent of the initial state of the system and straightforward to numerically calculate. As an example, the measure is used in numerical simulations to evaluate fidelities of optimally controlled quantum gate operations (for one- and two-qubit systems), in the presence of a decohering environment. This example illustrates the utility of this measure for optimal control of quantum operations in the realistic case of open-system dynamics.

arXiv:0909.0077•New Journal of Physics•Jan 15, 2010•51 citations
We make comments on the conclusions of the paper:'Compare Quantum Operation Sensitivity for DifferentDistance Measures' [Commun.Theor.Phys.53 (2010)635],and give a physical example to describe the non-equivalenceof the fidelity and the trace distance.We prove that the fidelity is not more sensitive to a quantum operation than thetrace distance.
We investigate the coherence measures induced by fidelity and trace norm, based on the coherence quantification recently proposed by Baumgratz et al. [T. Baumgratz, M. Cramer, and M. B. Plenio, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 140401 (2014)]. We show that the fidelity of coherence does not in general satisfy the monotonicity requirement as a measure of coherence under the subselection of the measurement condition. We find that the trace norm of coherence can act as a measure of coherence for qubits and some special class of qutrits with some restrictions on the incoherent operators, while the general case needs to be explored further.
The problem of quantifying the difference between evolutions of an open quantum system (in particular, between the actual evolution of an open system and the ideal target operation on the corresponding closed system) is important in quantum control, especially in control of quantum information processing. Motivated by this problem, we develop a measure for evaluating the distance between unitary evolution operators of a composite quantum system that consists of a sub-system of interest (e.g. a quantum information processor) and environment. The main characteristic of this measure is the invariance with respect to the effect of the evolution operator on the environment, which follows from an equivalence relation that exists between unitary operators acting on the composite system, when the effect on only the sub-system of interest is considered. The invariance to the environment's transformation makes it possible to quantitatively compare the evolution of an open quantum system and its closed counterpart. The distance measure also determines the fidelity bounds of a general quantum channel (a completely positive and trace-preserving map acting on the sub-system of interest) with respect to a unitary target transformation. This measure is also independent of the initial state of the system and straightforward to numerically calculate. As an example, the measure is used in numerical simulations to evaluate fidelities of optimally controlled quantum gate operations (for one- and two-qubit systems), in the presence of a decohering environment. This example illustrates the utility of this measure for optimal control of quantum operations in the realistic case of open-system dynamics.