Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Cambridge University Press eBooks

SU(K) spin chain

Yoshio Kuramoto, Yusuke S. Kato

Published Aug 6, 2009• 2 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1017/cbo9780511596827.006

Related papers

SU(n) Heisenberg spin chain

Sophocles J. Orfanidis

Physics Letters A•Jan 1, 1980•35 citations

Dynamics of one-dimensional quantum systems : inverse-square interaction models

義夫 倉本, 祐輔 加藤

Preface 1. Introduction Part I. Physical Properties: 2. Single-component Sutherland model 3. Multi-component Sutherland model 4. Spin chain with 1/r2 interactions 5. SU(K) spin chain 6. Supersymmetric t-J model with 1/r2 interaction Part II. Mathematics Related to 1/r2 Systems: 7. Jack polynomials 8. Yang-Baxter relations and orthogonal eigenbasis 9. SU(K) and supersymmetric Yangians 10. Uglov's theory Epilogue References List of symbols Index.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Jan 1, 2009•14 citations

SU(K) and supersymmetric Yangians

Yoshio Kuramoto, Yusuke S. Kato

We now describe the properties of the SU( >K ) chain in more algebraic terms. The relevant symmetry is the SU( K ) Yangian, which is usually referred to as Y ( sl K ). On the other hand, the Yangian symmetry of the Sutherland model with spin 1/2 is given by Y ( gl 2 ). The difference between Y ( sl K ) and Y ( gl K ) is that the charge degrees of freedom U(1) is absent in Y ( sl K ), while the spin degrees of freedom is included in both Y ( sl K ) and Y ( sl K ). In Section 4.8.3, we have removed the U(1) component by means of the freezing trick, i.e., by taking the infinitely large repulsion parameter. In this chapter we take a more algebraic approach to study Y ( sl K ), which makes the relation between Y ( gl K ) and Y ( sl K ) clearer. In Section 9.1, we begin with the construction of the SU( K ) monodromy matrix as the product form. The commuting property of the Cherednik–Dunkl operators plays a crucial role here. The monodromy matrix is the basic building block of the Yangian algbebra, as discussed in Section 8.2. Because the Hamiltonian of the SU( K ) spin chain and the monodromy matrix commute, each eigenstate of the spin chain constitutes a basis for representations of the SU( K ) Yangian. In Section 9.2 and 9.3, we discuss the quantum determinant by comparing it with the ordinary determinant. It is demonstrated in Section 9.4 that the quantum determinant has a scalar nature that leads to a simple evaluation. Because of the scalar nature, however, the quantum determinant cannot distinguish different SU( K ) Yangian states.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Aug 6, 2009•0 citations

Quantum Spin Chains

Jill C. Bonner, Henk W. J. Blöte, Hans Beck +1 more

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 1981•46 citations

Elementary Excitations and Dynamical Correlation Functions of the Calogero-Sutherland Model with Internal Symmetry

Yusuke S. Kato, Takashi Yamamoto, Mitsuhiro Arikawa

We consider the physical properties of elementary excitations of the Calogero-Sutherland (CS) model with SU(K) internal symmetry. From the results on the thermodynamics of this model, we obtain the charge, spin, and statistics of elementary excitations. Combining this knowledge and the known results on the dynamics in the spinless CS model, we propose the expression for the dynamical correlation functions of the SU(K) CS model. In the asymptotic region, we confirm the consistency of our results with predictions from conformal field theory.

arXiv:cond-mat/9703073•Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Jul 15, 1997•12 citations

Closed SU(2) invariant spin chain

S. Pallua, Predrag Dominis Prester

Nuclear Physics B - Proceedings Supplements•Jan 1, 1996•0 citations
We now describe the properties of the SU( >K ) chain in more algebraic terms. The relevant symmetry is the SU( K ) Yangian, which is usually referred to as Y ( sl K ). On the other hand, the Yangian symmetry of the Sutherland model with spin 1/2 is given by Y ( gl 2 ). The difference between Y ( sl K ) and Y ( gl K ) is that the charge degrees of freedom U(1) is absent in Y ( sl K ), while the spin degrees of freedom is included in both Y ( sl K ) and Y ( sl K ). In Section 4.8.3, we have removed the U(1) component by means of the freezing trick, i.e., by taking the infinitely large repulsion parameter. In this chapter we take a more algebraic approach to study Y ( sl K ), which makes the relation between Y ( gl K ) and Y ( sl K ) clearer. In Section 9.1, we begin with the construction of the SU( K ) monodromy matrix as the product form. The commuting property of the Cherednik–Dunkl operators plays a crucial role here. The monodromy matrix is the basic building block of the Yangian algbebra, as discussed in Section 8.2. Because the Hamiltonian of the SU( K ) spin chain and the monodromy matrix commute, each eigenstate of the spin chain constitutes a basis for representations of the SU( K ) Yangian. In Section 9.2 and 9.3, we discuss the quantum determinant by comparing it with the ordinary determinant. It is demonstrated in Section 9.4 that the quantum determinant has a scalar nature that leads to a simple evaluation. Because of the scalar nature, however, the quantum determinant cannot distinguish different SU( K ) Yangian states.
We consider the physical properties of elementary excitations of the Calogero-Sutherland (CS) model with SU(K) internal symmetry. From the results on the thermodynamics of this model, we obtain the charge, spin, and statistics of elementary excitations. Combining this knowledge and the known results on the dynamics in the spinless CS model, we propose the expression for the dynamical correlation functions of the SU(K) CS model. In the asymptotic region, we confirm the consistency of our results with predictions from conformal field theory.