Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Quantum Theory and Religion

Trilisa M. Perrine

Published Jan 1, 1999• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Quantum Indeterminism in a Dialogue between Science and Religion

Dmitry Viktorovich Kiryanov

Труды кафедры богословия Санкт-Петербургской Духовной Академии•Jan 1, 2023•2 citations

Quantum Theory, Philosophy, and Theology

S. J. Stoeger

Routledge eBooks•Feb 17, 2015•0 citations

THE ROLE OF CONCEPTUAL FOUNDATIONS OF QUANTUM THEORY IN THE DIALOGUE BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION

J. J. Tambergs

A recent development in the understanding of conceptual foundations of quantum theory is discussed, giving particular attention to the analysis of the so called Schroedinger’s cat paradox. The solution of this problem in the frameworks of Everett-Wheeler many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is considered, as well as the philosophical and theological consequences following from this interpretation. The recommendations are given, concerning the use of questions related with conceptual foundations of quantum theory in the education when introducing students and senior class pupils in problems of the dialogue between science and religion. \nKEY WORDS: science, religion, dialogue, foundations of quantum theory, many-worlds interpretation

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Schrödinger’s cat experiment, quantum theory, results, lead to 7.

Jean‐Olivier Durand

Schrödinger’s cat experiment has been studied a lot, and many interpretations of this paradox have been published. I have used a robust and rigorous scientific process to study this experiment. The process consists of directly observing the experiment, and applying the results of the experiment in the most simple, strict, direct, way possible, without any interpretation. With this experiment, I demonstrate that quantum theory is false, we make a mistake with it, and our world is virtual. I have therefore corrected 7 existing theories (4 quantum theories with wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Hugh Everett’s theory, quantum energy diagrams, and 3 cosmos theories, general relativity, black holes, Big Bang), (1 error per theory = 7 errors). I have used these 7 theories to complete quantum theory with 6 postulates and 1 theorem (7 proposals). This allowed me to put humans in the center of quantum theory, and I have studied 7 behaviors of human beings (normal people, newborn babies, narcissists, people suffering from bipolar disorders, psychotics, Jesus Christ and epileptics). Jesus Christ is the son of quantum world. I have modeled Jesus Christ’s miracles and most of them were realized. 7 is a complete randomness, I have not done it on purpose. I have also elaborated a cosmological model with 6 major events to describe our Cosmos. The 7 th event of the Cosmos could be the rest of randomness, as randomness is the basis of quantum theory. I make predictions with this model which could be confirm with the James Webb spatial telescope. If confirmed, this theory could have a major impact on humanity because what predicted all religions could also be confirmed and I was very surprised myself about this. 7 is a sacred number in all religions. I did not expect it, I do not really practice religions and I do not really believe in them, although I was educated with catholic religion. Indeed, here rigorous science reconciles all religions, all humans, all what we are as quantum theory is always true.

•Sep 6, 2024•0 citations

Theology, Science, and Quantum Theory

1517 Media eBooks•Jan 24, 2014•0 citations

Collective scattering of light from disordered atomic clouds

C. E. Máximo

This much I can say with definiteness -namely, that there is no scientific basis for the denial of religion -nor is there in my judgement any excuse for a conflict between science and religion, for their fields are entirely different.Men who know very little of science and men who know very little of religion do indeed get to quarrelling, and the onlookers imagine that there is a conflict between science and religion, whereas the conflict is only between two different species of ignorance.The first important quarrel of this sort arose over the advancing by Copernicus of his theory that the earth, instead of being a flat plane and the center of the universe, was actually only one of a number of little planets, rotating once a day upon its axis and circling once a year about the sun.Copernicus was a priest -the canon of a cathedraland he was primarily a religious rather than a scientific man.He knew that the foundations of real religion are not laid where scientific discoveries of any kind can disturb them.He was persecuted, not because he went against the teachings of religion but because under his theory man was not the center of the universe and this was most displeasing news to a number of egoists."

•Mar 2, 2018•0 citations
A recent development in the understanding of conceptual foundations of quantum theory is discussed, giving particular attention to the analysis of the so called Schroedinger’s cat paradox. The solution of this problem in the frameworks of Everett-Wheeler many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics is considered, as well as the philosophical and theological consequences following from this interpretation. The recommendations are given, concerning the use of questions related with conceptual foundations of quantum theory in the education when introducing students and senior class pupils in problems of the dialogue between science and religion. \nKEY WORDS: science, religion, dialogue, foundations of quantum theory, many-worlds interpretation
Schrödinger’s cat experiment has been studied a lot, and many interpretations of this paradox have been published. I have used a robust and rigorous scientific process to study this experiment. The process consists of directly observing the experiment, and applying the results of the experiment in the most simple, strict, direct, way possible, without any interpretation. With this experiment, I demonstrate that quantum theory is false, we make a mistake with it, and our world is virtual. I have therefore corrected 7 existing theories (4 quantum theories with wave-particle duality, quantum entanglement, Hugh Everett’s theory, quantum energy diagrams, and 3 cosmos theories, general relativity, black holes, Big Bang), (1 error per theory = 7 errors). I have used these 7 theories to complete quantum theory with 6 postulates and 1 theorem (7 proposals). This allowed me to put humans in the center of quantum theory, and I have studied 7 behaviors of human beings (normal people, newborn babies, narcissists, people suffering from bipolar disorders, psychotics, Jesus Christ and epileptics). Jesus Christ is the son of quantum world. I have modeled Jesus Christ’s miracles and most of them were realized. 7 is a complete randomness, I have not done it on purpose. I have also elaborated a cosmological model with 6 major events to describe our Cosmos. The 7 th event of the Cosmos could be the rest of randomness, as randomness is the basis of quantum theory. I make predictions with this model which could be confirm with the James Webb spatial telescope. If confirmed, this theory could have a major impact on humanity because what predicted all religions could also be confirmed and I was very surprised myself about this. 7 is a sacred number in all religions. I did not expect it, I do not really practice religions and I do not really believe in them, although I was educated with catholic religion. Indeed, here rigorous science reconciles all religions, all humans, all what we are as quantum theory is always true.
This much I can say with definiteness -namely, that there is no scientific basis for the denial of religion -nor is there in my judgement any excuse for a conflict between science and religion, for their fields are entirely different.Men who know very little of science and men who know very little of religion do indeed get to quarrelling, and the onlookers imagine that there is a conflict between science and religion, whereas the conflict is only between two different species of ignorance.The first important quarrel of this sort arose over the advancing by Copernicus of his theory that the earth, instead of being a flat plane and the center of the universe, was actually only one of a number of little planets, rotating once a day upon its axis and circling once a year about the sun.Copernicus was a priest -the canon of a cathedraland he was primarily a religious rather than a scientific man.He knew that the foundations of real religion are not laid where scientific discoveries of any kind can disturb them.He was persecuted, not because he went against the teachings of religion but because under his theory man was not the center of the universe and this was most displeasing news to a number of egoists."