Resettably Secure Computation

Tobias Nilges

Nico Döttling, Daniel Kraschewski, Jörn Müller‐Quade +1 more

Silvio M. Micali, Phillip Rogaway

Vipul Goyal, Hemanta K. Maji

Secure computation protocols inherently involve multiple rounds of interaction among the parties where, typically a party has to keep a state about what has happened in the protocol so far and then wait for the other party to respond. We study if this is inherent. In particular, we study the possibility of designing cryptographic protocols where the parties can be completely stateless and compute the outgoing message by applying a single fixed function to the incoming message (independent of any state). The problem of designing stateless secure computation protocols can be reduced to the problem of designing protocols satisfying the notion of resettable computation introduced by Canetti, Goldreich, Goldwasser and Micali (FOCS'01) and widely studied thereafter. The current start of art in resettable computation allows for construction of protocols which provide security only when a single predetermined party is resettable [15]. An exception is for the case of the zero-knowledge functionality for which a protocol in which both parties are resettable was recently obtained by Deng, Goyal and Sahai (FOCS'09). The fundamental question left open in this sequence of works is, whether fully-resettable computation is possible, when: 1) An adversary can corrupt any number of parties, and 2) The adversary can reset any party to its original state during the execution of the protocol and can restart the protocol. In this paper, we resolve the above problem by constructing secure protocols realizing any efficiently computable multi-party functionality in the plain model under standard cryptographic assumptions. First, we construct a Fully-Resettable Simulation Sound Zero-Knowledge (ss-rs-rZK) protocol. Next, based on these ss-rs-rZK protocols, we show how to compile any semi-honest secure protocol into a protocol secure against fully resetting adversaries. Next, we study a seemingly unrelated open question: "Does there exist a functionality which, in the concurrent setting, is impossible to securely realize using BB simulation but can be realized using NBB simulation?". We resolve the above question in the affirmative by giving an example of such a (reactive) functionality. Somewhat surprisingly, this is done by making a connection to the existence of a fully resettable simulation sound zero-knowledge protocol.

Nico Döttling, Daniel Kraschewski, Jörn Müller‐Quade +1 more

Universally composable multi-party computation is impossible without setup assumptions. Motivated by the ubiquitous use of secure hardware in many real world security applications, Katz (EUROCRYPT 2007) proposed a model of tamper-proof hardware as a UC-setup assumption. An important aspect of this model is whether the hardware token is allowed to hold a state or not. Real world examples of tamper-proof hardware that can hold a state are expensive hardware security modules commonly used in mainframes. Stateless, or resettable hardware tokens model cheaper devices such as smartcards, where an adversarial user can cut off the power supply, thus resetting the card’s internal state. A natural question is how the stateful and the resettable hardware model compare in their cryptographic power, given that either the receiver or the sender of the token (and thus the token itself) might be malicious. In this work we show that any UC-functionality that can be implemented by a protocol using a single untrusted stateful hardware token can likewise be implemented using a single untrusted resettable hardware token, assuming only the existence of one-way functions. We present two compilers that transform UC-secure protocols in the stateful hardware model into UC-secure protocols in the resettable hardware model. The first compiler can be proven secure assuming merely the existence of one-way functions. However, it (necessarily) makes use of computationally rather expensive non-black-box techniques. We provide an alternative second compiler that replaces the expensive non-black-box component of the first compiler by few additional seed OTs. While this second compiler introduces the seed OTs as additional setup assumptions, it is computationally very efficient.

Kai-Min Chung, Rafail Ostrovsky, Rafael Pass +1 more

Resettable-security, introduced by Canetti, Goldreich, Goldwasser and Micali (STOC'00), considers the security of cryptographic two-party protocols (in particular zero-knowledge arguments) in a setting where the attacker may “reset” or “rewind” one of the players. The strongest notion of resettable security, simultaneous resettability, introduced by Barak, Goldreich, Goldwasser and Lindell (FOCS'01), requires resettable security to hold for both parties: in the context of zero-knowledge, both the soundness and the zero-knowledge conditions remain robust to resetting attacks. To date, all known constructions of protocols satisfying simultaneous resettable security rely on the existence of ZAPs; constructions of ZAPs are only known based on the existence of trapdoor permutations or number-theoretic assumptions. In this paper, we provide a new method for constructing protocols satisfying simultaneous resettable security while relying only on the minimal assumption of one-way functions. Our key results establish, assuming only one-way functions: Every language in NP has an ω(1)-round simultaneously resettable witness indistinguishable argument system; Every language in NP has a (polynomial-round) simultaneously resettable zero-knowledge argument system. The key conceptual insight in our technique is relying on black-box impossibility results for concurrent zero-knowledge to achieve resettable-security.