This study delves into the realm of Schrödinger equations and wave mechanics, aiming to see if they could provide a foundation comparable in generality to that formulated in the preceding chapter, and to bridge the gap between classical and quantum physics. It begins by deriving a family of Schrödinger-like equations. The study introduces an intuitive approach for deriving an entire spectrum of Schrödinger-like equations, encompassing classical and novel variants, through the utilization of the complex wave function and its conjugate, along with the assumptionsA01, A08. Examining the concepts of the complex wave function
ψ and the multi-vector wave function
Ψ reveals their equal generality, suggesting the applicability of Schrödinger-like equations in the context of multi-vectors, including both
ψ and the phase
Φ . To explore the correspondence principle between quantum and classical mechanics, a well-studied example is dissected in Section 2.4, necessitating the development of a suitable wave function (2.50). The use of the real function [1, (1.50)] to form the complex test function (2.50) is a logical step, and its substitution into the Schrödinger equations aims to yield an identity. The substitution of (2.50) reveals a discrepancy between the left and right sides of the Schrödinger equations (2.25, 2.26), highlighting their inadequacy in describing the classical mechanics example accurately. This observation underscores the limitations of classical Schrödinger equations and their departure from the correspondence principle. Consequently, a more comprehensive set of Schrödinger-like equations (2.58-2.68) is derived, rendering the previously considered equations (2.25, 2.26) irrelevant. Substituting the test function (2.50) into equations (2.58-2.68) demonstrates their soundness and suitability for the example, establishing the correspondence principle between classical and quantum mechanics. Our analysis indicates that the classical set [1, (1.4-1.6)] exhibits a higher degree of generality than the quantum one (2.58-2.68), thereby deferring the definitive validation of this assertion to forthcoming research endeavours. These findings underscore the potential significance of our framework in bridging the gap between quantum and classical mechanics, promising further exploration and validation in future studies.
The discovery that any classical random variable with all moments gives rise to a full quantum theory (that in the Gaussian and Poisson cases coincides with the usual one) implies that a quantum-type formalism will enter into practically all applications of classical probability and statistics. The new challenge consists in finding the classical interpretation, for different types of classical contexts, of typical quantum notions such as entanglement, normal order, equilibrium states, etc. As an example, every classical symmetric random variable has a canonically associated conjugate momentum. In usual quantum mechanics (associated with Gaussian or Poisson classical random variables), the interpretation of the momentum operator was already clear to Heisenberg. How should we interpret the conjugate momentum operator associated with classical random variables outside the Gauss-Poisson class? The Introduction is intended to place in historical perspective the recent developments that are the main object of the present exposition.
Classical and Quantum Mechanics make use of different objects and they also were written on different background spaces.As a consequence, they have followed different paths regarding the mathematical objects that they use.Classical Mechanics makes use of points and functions on a real cotangent space T * Q of a mechanical system, and makes use of differential geometry as the basic language with which the theory is developed.This is due to the existence of trajectories of single points.On the other side, Quantum Mechanics makes use of state vectors in a complex Hilbert space, with operators, commutators, and eigenvectors, and makes use of some postulates that look weird from a classical point of view.This is a point of view that was induced by the lack of trajectories and by the use of probabilistic interpretations of state vectors.There have been efforts to define similar classical and quantum functions that can be compared with each other.Quantum densities were written as functions on phase-space by means of integral transformations.Two of these transformations are the Wigner (
In this chapter, we derived some elements of quantum mechanics, which are essential for the further development of our theory: the momentum of a system of Fermions in the second quantization, the coordinate and momentum of a harmonic oscillator as a unique operator at two different moments of time, Boson and Fermion operator algebra, coherent states, the electron-field interaction, the quantization of the electromagnetic field, Boson and Fermion distributions, and densities of states in a degenerate, or a non-degenerate system of Fermions. Our starting point is the wave nature of a quantum particle, the Hamiltonian equations were obtained as group velocities in the two conjugate spaces of the wave, of the coordinates and of the momentum. In this way, the Schr¨odinger equation and the electron-field potential of interaction are obtained from quantum equations generated by the particle wave function.
Physical observables which are measured in a particular state of a dynamical system can be conveniently represented in classical mechanics by mathematical variables, on the grounds that all have definite values in any classical state. In contrast, the statistical interpretation of wave functions describing the quantum states implies that there are uncertainties in the measurement of any two observables which can be represented by canonically conjugate variables, such as position q and momentum p q . This requires any measured dynamical observable A in a quantum state to be associated with an expectation value 〈 A 〉.
This paper proposes an interpretation of quantum mechanics, relying on the time-symmetric stochastic dynamics of quantum particles and on non-classical probability theory. Our main purpose is to demonstrate that the wave function and its complex conjugate can be interpreted as complex probability distributions in two complex diffusion equations related to non-real forward and backward in time stochastic motions respectively. We say non-real because Schroedinger forward and backward diffusions describe both reversible (real trajectories) and irreversible trajectories (non-real trajectories). The reversible trajectories are the only real trajectories and are given by the intersection of those forward and backward processes. It turns out that if we translate this intersection using set-theoretic language, we are led to a reversible diffusion described by Born rule probabilities. This proposal is useful also for explaining more about the role of complex numbers in quantum mechanics that produces this so-called "wave-like" nature of quantum reality. Our perspective also challenges the notion of physical superposition and aims at a derivation of superposition principle not based on the linearity of Schroedinger's equation but relying on pure probability theory. Moreover, it is suggested that, embracing the idea of stochastic processes in quantum theory, explains the reasons for the appearance of classical behavior in large objects, in contrast to the quantum behavior of small ones. In other words, we claim that a combination of a probabilistic and no-ontic view (neither epistemic though) of the wave function with a stochastic hidden-variables approach, may provide some insight into the quantum physical reality and potentially establish the groundwork for a novel interpretation of quantum mechanics.