Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Contemporary Physics

The world of many worlds

Peter John Bussey

Published Feb 27, 2013• 3 citations
Publisher

Abstract

A review of The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955–1980 with Commentary, edited by J.A. Barrett and P. Byrne, Princeton, Princeton University Press, 2012, 392 pp., $7...
DOI
10.1080/00107514.2013.770071

Related papers

Many worlds make hard work

D.G.C. Jones

A review of Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory, & Reality, edited by S. Saunders, J. Barrett, A. Kent and D. Wallace, Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2012, reprint edition, 640 pp., 27.50 (paper...

Contemporary Physics•Feb 1, 2013•0 citations

Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality

Jeremy Butterfield

An assessment of the anthology, 'Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality', edited by Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent and David Wallace.

arXiv:1406.4320•Jun 17, 2014•24 citations

Many worlds: quantum theory and reality?

Iñaki San Pedro

Recent years have seen a good deal of work done on one of the most mind blowing and conceptually radical views in quantum mechanics, namely the ‘many worlds’ interpretation of quantum mechanics. Many worlds was first proposed by Hugh Everett III in his long Ph.D. dissertation, which only some years later, and after significant shortening, came to be published as the ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’ (Everett 1957). To commemorate the 50th anniversary of the first publication of Everett's ideas, two conferences were held at Oxford University and the Perimeter Institute, which brought together some of the most active researchers in the field. The works presented in these two conferences have now been compiled in the volume Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality, edited by Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent and David Wallace.1 This is then a comprehensive collection of papers – 23 papers altogether – where the reader will find virtually anything that can be said about the many worlds interpretation today.

Analysis•Feb 16, 2012•1 citation

Review of 'Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality'

Jeremy Butterfield

This is a Critical Notice (published in 2011) for the general philosophical journal, Philosophy, of the anthology 'Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality' (OUP), edited by Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent and David Wallace.

•Feb 1, 2011•1 citation

B. S. DeWitt and N. Graham編 : The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics, Princeton Univ. Press, 1973, 252ページ, 24.5×16cm, 4,250円.

迪 亀淵

日本物理學會誌•Sep 5, 1974•0 citations

Jeffrey A. Barrett and Peter Byrne, eds. , The Everett Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: Collected Works 1955-1980 with Commentary . Reviewed by

Sheldon Richmond

Spinoza’s metaphysics has returned in the work of Hugh Everett as physics— as a complete and consistent interpretation of Quantum Mechanics that resolves the traditional puzzles of the standard interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.

•Jun 30, 2015•0 citations
Recent years have seen a good deal of work done on one of the most mind blowing and conceptually radical views in quantum mechanics, namely the ‘many worlds’ interpretation of quantum mechanics. Many worlds was first proposed by Hugh Everett III in his long Ph.D. dissertation, which only some years later, and after significant shortening, came to be published as the ‘Relative State Formulation of Quantum Mechanics’ (Everett 1957). To commemorate the 50th anniversary of the first publication of Everett's ideas, two conferences were held at Oxford University and the Perimeter Institute, which brought together some of the most active researchers in the field. The works presented in these two conferences have now been compiled in the volume Many Worlds? Everett, Quantum Theory and Reality, edited by Simon Saunders, Jonathan Barrett, Adrian Kent and David Wallace.1 This is then a comprehensive collection of papers – 23 papers altogether – where the reader will find virtually anything that can be said about the many worlds interpretation today.