Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A

Invariance Groups in Classical and Quantum Mechanics

D. J. Simms

Published Apr 1, 1973• 4 citations
Publisher

Abstract

Abstract This is a report on some new relations and analogies between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics which arise out of the work of Kostant and Souriau. Topics treated are i) the role of symmetry groups; ii) the notion of elementary system and the role of Casimir invariants; iii) energy levels; iv) quantisation in terms of geometric data on the classical phase space. Some applications are described.

DOI
10.1515/zna-1973-3-432

Related papers

Group-theoretical foundations of classical and quantum mechanics. II. Elementary systems

Luis Martı́nez Alonso

Classical and quantum elementary systems are investigated from the point of view of invariance under a connected Lie group. The classification and characterization of elementary systems are considered in a unified way. The representation theory of symmetric and enveloping algebras is used as a tool in order to characterize the observables physically and also to analyze the analogies between classical and quantum mechanics. The results obtained are applied to the Galilei, Poincaré, and Weyl Lie groups.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Feb 1, 1979•10 citations

Hidden invariance of the free classical particle

Santiago García

A formalism describing the dynamics of classical and quantum systems from a group theoretical point of view is presented. We apply it to the simple example of the classical free particle. The Galileo group G is the symmetry group of the free equations of motion. Consideration of the free particle Lagrangian semi-invariance under G leads to a larger symmetry group, which is a central extension of the Galileo group by the real numbers. We study the dynamics associated with this group, and characterize quantities like Noether invariants and evolution equations in terms of group geometric objects. An extension of the Galileo group by U(1) leads to quantum mechanics.

arXiv:hep-th/9306040•American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1994•2 citations

Quantum mechanics: symmetry and interpretation

Sebastián Fortín, Olímpia Lombardi

In this paper it will be argued that any realist interpretation of quantum mechanics intending to preserve the objectivity of the set of the definite-valued observables should require such a set to be invariant under the symmetry group of the theory. In particular, it will be shown that the natural way to reach this goal is to appeal to the Casimir operators of the Galilean group. Additionally, this idea will be generalized in two ways: (i) by selecting the definite-valued observables of a system in quantum field theory as those represented by the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group, and (ii) by extending the strategy to gauge symmetries.

•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Preface

This Foundations of Quantum Theory special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General contains contributions on basic aspects of modern quantum and mathematical physics. The contribution topics relate to two conferences, `Quantum Theory and Symmetries' held in Krakow (18-21 July 2001, organized by E Kapuscik and A Horzela) and `Symmetry in Sciences' held in Bregenz (23-27 July 2001, organized by B Gruber and M Ramek). Both conferences had special sessions dedicated to the memory of Professor L O'Raifeartaigh. In modern quantum physics there are several important aspects including Bell inequalities, quantum groups, nonlinear dynamics, dissipation and the time-irreversibility problem, alternative approaches and structures in quantum mechanics, quantum control, star-product quantization, etc, as well as different applications in nuclear and elementary particle physics and purely quantum effects analogous to the nonstationary Casimir effect, and different sorts of interference effects for matter waves. All of these problems were discussed at the conferences in Krakow and Bregenz and are presented in the contributions to the special issue. For example, quantum groups were found to be appropriate for the description of nonlinear dynamics and, in particular, nonlinear vibrations for which the phase of the oscillations depends on the energy. It was also found that biHamiltonian systems may correspond to different quantum pictures for the same classical equations of motion including nonlinear vibrations. Thus, it has transpired that there is an interesting link between several aspects of quantum and classical dynamics and the formalism of quantum groups. Another new quantum effect is the nonclassical behaviour of slow packets interacting with macroscopic surfaces. Quantum physics progresses rapidly and we hope that the contributions to this special issue will help readers learn more about the fundamental new aspects of quantum phenomena and the development of a mathematical formalism describing quantum and classical dynamics. Andrzej Horzela, Edward Kapuscik and Vladimir I Man'ko Guest Editors

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Sep 24, 2002•0 citations

Group theoretical aspects of the geometric phase in quantum mechanics.

Narasimhaiengar Mukunda

The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.

•Jan 1, 1999•0 citations

Souriau's Axiomatic Geometric Model of Quantum States: Representation Theory, Positive-Type Functions, Information Geometry, and Extensions Beyond Linear Systems

Syed Muntasir Mamun

This paper explores Jean-Marie Souriau's axiomatic framework for quantum mechanics, rooted in representation theory and information geometry, as revived by Frédéric Barbaresco. It delineates quantum states as normalized positive-type functions on dynamical groups, satisfying subordination, Hermitian positivity, and quantization inequalities that yield Hilbert spaces, unitary representations, uncertainty relations, and mixed/Gibbs states. The model unifies classical symplectic geometry with quantum axiomatics, exemplified in linear Heisenberg-Weyl systems producing coherent states. Comparative analysis contrasts Souriau's approach with Kostant's geometric quantization, algebraic QM, and information-geometric metrics (e.g., Balian-Petz), highlighting its group-theoretic strengths and diffeological generality. Extensions propose integrations with infinite-dimensional QFT, quantum thermodynamics, entanglement geometry, and applications in signal processing, machine learning, and quantum computing, forging a cohesive symmetry-driven geometric paradigm for quantum phenomena. Mamun, SM (2026)………………………………..1 Souriau's Axiomatic Geometric Model of Quantum States: Representation Theory, Positive-Type Functions, Information Geometry, and Extensions Beyond Linear Systems Also available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/attachments/131647634/download_file?s=portfolio

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations
Abstract This is a report on some new relations and analogies between classical mechanics and quantum mechanics which arise out of the work of Kostant and Souriau. Topics treated are i) the role of symmetry groups; ii) the notion of elementary system and the role of Casimir invariants; iii) energy levels; iv) quantisation in terms of geometric data on the classical phase space. Some applications are described.
Classical and quantum elementary systems are investigated from the point of view of invariance under a connected Lie group. The classification and characterization of elementary systems are considered in a unified way. The representation theory of symmetric and enveloping algebras is used as a tool in order to characterize the observables physically and also to analyze the analogies between classical and quantum mechanics. The results obtained are applied to the Galilei, Poincaré, and Weyl Lie groups.
A formalism describing the dynamics of classical and quantum systems from a group theoretical point of view is presented. We apply it to the simple example of the classical free particle. The Galileo group G is the symmetry group of the free equations of motion. Consideration of the free particle Lagrangian semi-invariance under G leads to a larger symmetry group, which is a central extension of the Galileo group by the real numbers. We study the dynamics associated with this group, and characterize quantities like Noether invariants and evolution equations in terms of group geometric objects. An extension of the Galileo group by U(1) leads to quantum mechanics.
In this paper it will be argued that any realist interpretation of quantum mechanics intending to preserve the objectivity of the set of the definite-valued observables should require such a set to be invariant under the symmetry group of the theory. In particular, it will be shown that the natural way to reach this goal is to appeal to the Casimir operators of the Galilean group. Additionally, this idea will be generalized in two ways: (i) by selecting the definite-valued observables of a system in quantum field theory as those represented by the Casimir operators of the Poincaré group, and (ii) by extending the strategy to gauge symmetries.
This Foundations of Quantum Theory special issue of Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General contains contributions on basic aspects of modern quantum and mathematical physics. The contribution topics relate to two conferences, `Quantum Theory and Symmetries' held in Krakow (18-21 July 2001, organized by E Kapuscik and A Horzela) and `Symmetry in Sciences' held in Bregenz (23-27 July 2001, organized by B Gruber and M Ramek). Both conferences had special sessions dedicated to the memory of Professor L O'Raifeartaigh. In modern quantum physics there are several important aspects including Bell inequalities, quantum groups, nonlinear dynamics, dissipation and the time-irreversibility problem, alternative approaches and structures in quantum mechanics, quantum control, star-product quantization, etc, as well as different applications in nuclear and elementary particle physics and purely quantum effects analogous to the nonstationary Casimir effect, and different sorts of interference effects for matter waves. All of these problems were discussed at the conferences in Krakow and Bregenz and are presented in the contributions to the special issue. For example, quantum groups were found to be appropriate for the description of nonlinear dynamics and, in particular, nonlinear vibrations for which the phase of the oscillations depends on the energy. It was also found that biHamiltonian systems may correspond to different quantum pictures for the same classical equations of motion including nonlinear vibrations. Thus, it has transpired that there is an interesting link between several aspects of quantum and classical dynamics and the formalism of quantum groups. Another new quantum effect is the nonclassical behaviour of slow packets interacting with macroscopic surfaces. Quantum physics progresses rapidly and we hope that the contributions to this special issue will help readers learn more about the fundamental new aspects of quantum phenomena and the development of a mathematical formalism describing quantum and classical dynamics. Andrzej Horzela, Edward Kapuscik and Vladimir I Man'ko Guest Editors
The geometric phase in quantum mechanics was originally elucidated in the context of the adiabatic theorem. This and other limitations were later removed. We show how this phase can be presented as the simplest functional of smooth open curves of unit vectors in Hilbert space, invariant under the two groups of local phase changes and monotonic reparametrisations. This viewpoint clarifies the role of the early Pancharatnam criterion for two Hilbert space vectors to be `in phase', in the later geometric phase context. Noncyclic evolution is handled in a very direct manner. Connections to the Bargmann invariants of quantum mechanics are immediate and can be exploited. A class of geometric phases arises in connection with unitary representations of Lie groups. In this case a surprisingly complete analysis of the structure of the geometric phase is possible, motivated by the Wigner-Eckart theorem. The interplay between geometric phase ideas and Lie group unitary representations is extraordinarily rich; the differential geometric structures of Lie groups and coset spaces play very important roles and allow classification of all possible geometric phases associated with a given Lie group. Examples involving SU(2), SU(3) and the metaplectic group Mp(2) are presented.
This paper explores Jean-Marie Souriau's axiomatic framework for quantum mechanics, rooted in representation theory and information geometry, as revived by Frédéric Barbaresco. It delineates quantum states as normalized positive-type functions on dynamical groups, satisfying subordination, Hermitian positivity, and quantization inequalities that yield Hilbert spaces, unitary representations, uncertainty relations, and mixed/Gibbs states. The model unifies classical symplectic geometry with quantum axiomatics, exemplified in linear Heisenberg-Weyl systems producing coherent states. Comparative analysis contrasts Souriau's approach with Kostant's geometric quantization, algebraic QM, and information-geometric metrics (e.g., Balian-Petz), highlighting its group-theoretic strengths and diffeological generality. Extensions propose integrations with infinite-dimensional QFT, quantum thermodynamics, entanglement geometry, and applications in signal processing, machine learning, and quantum computing, forging a cohesive symmetry-driven geometric paradigm for quantum phenomena. Mamun, SM (2026)………………………………..1 Souriau's Axiomatic Geometric Model of Quantum States: Representation Theory, Positive-Type Functions, Information Geometry, and Extensions Beyond Linear Systems Also available on Academia.edu: https://www.academia.edu/attachments/131647634/download_file?s=portfolio