Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Revista Mexicana de Física

Hartree-fock theory in exactly soluble models with a finite number of particles

M. C. Cambiaggio, Angel Ricardo Plastino, L. Szybisz

Published Jan 1, 1981• 3 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Generalized Hartree-Fock theory and the Hubbard model

Volker Bach, Élliott H. Lieb, Jan Philip Solovej

arXiv:cond-mat/9312044•Journal of Statistical Physics•Jul 1, 1994•222 citations

How good is Hartree–Fock? Calculation of the static electric polarizability in an exactly soluble model

Joseph B. Krieger, S. E. Kaufman

The exactly soluble model, originally considered by Moshinsky, consisting of two spin-1/2 particles interacting through harmonic-oscillator forces and moving in a common harmonic-oscillator potential is extended to include the effects of an external electric field. We solve for the energy exactly, exactly in the Hartree–Fock approximation, and also compare to the results of Hartree–Fock perturbation theory. We find that the Hartree–Fock method yields the same result for the electric polarizability as the exact solution even though the field-independent part of the energy is not the same. However, when second-order Hartree–Fock perturbation theory is employed, the results for the polarizability can be substantially in error. Similar results obtain for the calculation of the matrix element for optical absorption in the dipole approximation.

American Journal of Physics•Jun 1, 1976•1 citation

Coherent correlated pair method versus Hartree-Fock with a soluble SU(3) Hamiltonian

A. Klar, Frank James Margetan, James P. Vary +1 more

We test the coherent correlated pair method with the soluble SU(3) Hamiltonian of Li, Klein, and Dreizler. We compare the results for the ground state energy with the exact solution and with the Hartree-Fock results as a function of coupling parameters and number of particles. For all cases the coherent correlated pair method yields the better upper bound to the ground state energy.NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Correlated pairs; coherent states; upper bounds to ground state energies; applications to exactly soluble SU(3) $N$-fermion model.

Physical Review C•Dec 1, 1983•5 citations

Hartree-Fock perturbation theory for systems with one-particle perturbation

R. Polák, Vladimı́r Kvasnička

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Dec 1, 1973•1 citation

Particle-number projection in the finite-temperature mean-field approximation

P. Fanto, Y. Alhassid, G. F. Bertsch

Finite-temperature mean-field theories, such as the Hartree--Fock (HF) and Hartree--Fock--Bogoliubov (HFB) theories, are formulated in the grand-canonical ensemble, and their applications to the calculation of statistical properties of nuclei such as level densities require a reduction to the canonical ensemble. In a previous publication [Y. Alhassid et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 044320 (2016)], it was found that ensemble-reduction methods based on the saddle-point approximation are not reliable in cases in which rotational symmetry or particle-number conservation is broken. In particular, the calculated HFB canonical entropy can be unphysical as a result of the inherent violation of particle-number conservation. In this work, we derive a general formula for exact particle-number projection after variation in the HFB approximation, assuming that the HFB Hamiltonian preserves time-reversal symmetry. This formula reduces to simpler known expressions in the HF and Bardeen--Cooper--Schrieffer (BCS) limits of the HFB. We apply this formula to calculate the thermodynamic quantities needed for level densities in the heavy nuclei $^{162}\mathrm{Dy}, ^{148}\mathrm{Sm}$, and $^{150}\mathrm{Sm}$. We find that the exact particle-number projection gives better physical results and is significantly more computationally efficient than the saddle-point methods. However, the fundamental limitations caused by broken symmetries in the mean-field approximation are still present.

arXiv:1610.08954•Physical Review C•Jul 7, 2017•18 citations

On the Hartree-Fock solution in field theory

Yasushi Takahashi, Hiroomi Umezawa

Physica•Jan 1, 1964•6 citations
The exactly soluble model, originally considered by Moshinsky, consisting of two spin-1/2 particles interacting through harmonic-oscillator forces and moving in a common harmonic-oscillator potential is extended to include the effects of an external electric field. We solve for the energy exactly, exactly in the Hartree–Fock approximation, and also compare to the results of Hartree–Fock perturbation theory. We find that the Hartree–Fock method yields the same result for the electric polarizability as the exact solution even though the field-independent part of the energy is not the same. However, when second-order Hartree–Fock perturbation theory is employed, the results for the polarizability can be substantially in error. Similar results obtain for the calculation of the matrix element for optical absorption in the dipole approximation.
We test the coherent correlated pair method with the soluble SU(3) Hamiltonian of Li, Klein, and Dreizler. We compare the results for the ground state energy with the exact solution and with the Hartree-Fock results as a function of coupling parameters and number of particles. For all cases the coherent correlated pair method yields the better upper bound to the ground state energy.NUCLEAR STRUCTURE Correlated pairs; coherent states; upper bounds to ground state energies; applications to exactly soluble SU(3) NNN-fermion model.
Finite-temperature mean-field theories, such as the Hartree--Fock (HF) and Hartree--Fock--Bogoliubov (HFB) theories, are formulated in the grand-canonical ensemble, and their applications to the calculation of statistical properties of nuclei such as level densities require a reduction to the canonical ensemble. In a previous publication [Y. Alhassid et al., Phys. Rev. C 93, 044320 (2016)], it was found that ensemble-reduction methods based on the saddle-point approximation are not reliable in cases in which rotational symmetry or particle-number conservation is broken. In particular, the calculated HFB canonical entropy can be unphysical as a result of the inherent violation of particle-number conservation. In this work, we derive a general formula for exact particle-number projection after variation in the HFB approximation, assuming that the HFB Hamiltonian preserves time-reversal symmetry. This formula reduces to simpler known expressions in the HF and Bardeen--Cooper--Schrieffer (BCS) limits of the HFB. We apply this formula to calculate the thermodynamic quantities needed for level densities in the heavy nuclei 162Dy,148Sm^{162}\mathrm{Dy}, ^{148}\mathrm{Sm}162Dy,148Sm, and 150Sm^{150}\mathrm{Sm}150Sm. We find that the exact particle-number projection gives better physical results and is significantly more computationally efficient than the saddle-point methods. However, the fundamental limitations caused by broken symmetries in the mean-field approximation are still present.