Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Science

Schrödinger's Cat Is Out of the Hat

Claudia D. Tesche

Published Oct 27, 2000• 8 citations
Publisher

Abstract

In 1935, Erwin Schrödinger suggested his famous gedanken experiment of the cat that is simultaneously "dead" and "alive" inside its box until the box is opened. But as Tesche explains in her Perspective, such a macroscopic manifestation of quantum mechanics has remained elusive until recently. The experiments by van der Wal et al. are an important step toward demonstrating that quantum mechanics can describe macroscopic phenomena. The approach may be exploited in quantum computing and quantum cryptography.

DOI
10.1126/science.290.5492.720

Related papers

Revealing the cat in the box

When Erwin Schrödinger suggested a thought experiment in which a cat inside a box could be both dead and alive at the same time, he conjured up one of the most evocative images in quantum mechanics. However, this paradoxical Picture is only valid when the system is free from external influences. Open the box, and the cat is forced into one or other of its classical states – a phenomenon known as decoherence.

Physics World•Feb 1, 2000•0 citations

Quantum largesse

In 1935 Erwin Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment to show the absurd consequences of applying quantum mechanics to everyday objects. Schrödinger imagined placing a cat in a box, along with a vial of deadly poison that is connected to a radioactive atom. If the atom decays, it releases the poison and kills the cat. When the box is closed we do not know if the atom has decayed or not, which means that it can be in a "superposition" of two states (decayed and non-decayed) at the same time. Therefore, protested Schrödinger, the cat can be both dead and alive at the same time – which is clearly absurd. There was obviously, he thought, some boundary between the microscopic world of atoms and quantum mechanics, and the macroscopic world of cats and classical mechanics.

Physics World•Aug 1, 2000•0 citations

Is Schrödinger's cat dead oa alive?

Wojciech Piotr Grygiel

The Schrödinger's Cat paradox was proposed in 1935 by Edwin Schrodinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, as an attempt to visualize the macroscopic realization of a quantum superposition state. A cat is placed in a sealed box together with a vial of poison. A two-state particle (e.g. an electron) is sent into a detector in the box resulting either in a broken or an intact vial and a dead or live cat, respectively. The main problem consists in whether the superposition state of a microscopic particle can be transferred upon the macroscopic cat, that is, whether the cat can exist in a superposition state, being simultaneously dead and alive. Since the standard Copenhagen interpretation is unable to assign any reality to the quantum superposition state, the paradox finds no resolution within the regime of this interpretation. Von Neumann's insistence on the uniform treatment of both microscopic (quantum) and macroscopic (classical) objects according to the laws of quantum mechanics provides a more consistent framework for the resolution of the paradox. In particular, the discovery of the phenomenon of decoherence, whereby the disappearance of the quantum interferences at the macro level is accounted for, suggests the onset of an extremely efficient interference relaxation process (10-23 s) upon the interaction of the two state particle with the detector. As a result, Schrodinger's cat can exist macroscopically either as dead or alive and never as a combination of both. Decoherence not only aids the resolution of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox but also sheds light upon the mechanisms by which the macro-world emerges from the microscopic quantum realm.

Philosophical Problems in Science (Zagadnienia Filozoficzne w Nauce)•Dec 2, 2005•0 citations

Bell Inequalities with Schrödinger Cats

M. D. Reid

Abstract In the Schrödinger cat gedanken experiment a “cat” is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states. There is the apparent interpretation that the “cat” is not in one state or the other, “alive” or “dead”. Here this interpretation is proved objectively. I propose the following definition of macroscopic reality: first, that the “cat” is either dead or alive, the measurement revealing which; second, that measurements on other “cats” some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, “dead” to “alive” and vice versa, to the “cat”. The predictions of quantum mechanics are shown to be incompatible with this premise.

Zeitschrift für Naturforschung A•Feb 1, 2001•5 citations

The paradox of Schrodinger's cat

C N Villars

Erwin Schrodinger first described the thought-experiment which has since become known as 'the paradox of Schrodinger's cat' 51 years ago. In recent years, popular accounts of quantum mechanics have tended to adopt one or other of the philosophically most extreme solutions to this paradox, i.e. the consciousness hypothesis or the many worlds interpretation. The author attempts to redress the balance by describing what he takes to be the orthodox solution to the paradox which explains the paradox, without recourse to such counterintuitive notions as a cat simultaneously dead and alive or a universe continually splitting into multiple worlds, as being due to a misapplication of the quantum formalism.

Physics Education•Jul 1, 1986•7 citations

Proposal to test quantum mechanics against macroscopic realism using continuous variable entanglement: a definitive signature of a Schrödinger cat

M. D. Reid

In the Schrödinger-cat gedanken experiment a cat is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states, alive and dead.The paradoxical interpretation of quantum mechanics is that the cat is not in one state or the other, alive or dead, immediately prior to its measurement. Because of this apparent defiance of macroscopic reality, quantum superpositions of states macroscopically distinct have generated much interest. Here we address the issue of proving a contradiction with macroscopic reality objectively, through the testable predictions of quantum mechanics. We consider the premises of macroscopic reality (that the ``cat'' is either ``dead'' or ``alive'', the measurement indicating which) and macroscopic locality (that simultaneous measurements some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, ``dead'' to ``alive'' and vice versa, to the ``cat''). The predictions of quantum mechanics for certain states, generated using states exhibiting continuous variable entanglement, are shown to be incompatible with the predictions of all theories based on this dual premise. Our proof is along the lines of Bell's theorem, but where all relevant measurements give macroscopically distinct results.

arXiv:quant-ph/0101052•Jan 12, 2001•0 citations
In 1935, Erwin Schrödinger suggested his famous gedanken experiment of the cat that is simultaneously "dead" and "alive" inside its box until the box is opened. But as Tesche explains in her Perspective, such a macroscopic manifestation of quantum mechanics has remained elusive until recently. The experiments by van der Wal et al. are an important step toward demonstrating that quantum mechanics can describe macroscopic phenomena. The approach may be exploited in quantum computing and quantum cryptography.
In 1935 Erwin Schrödinger proposed a thought experiment to show the absurd consequences of applying quantum mechanics to everyday objects. Schrödinger imagined placing a cat in a box, along with a vial of deadly poison that is connected to a radioactive atom. If the atom decays, it releases the poison and kills the cat. When the box is closed we do not know if the atom has decayed or not, which means that it can be in a "superposition" of two states (decayed and non-decayed) at the same time. Therefore, protested Schrödinger, the cat can be both dead and alive at the same time – which is clearly absurd. There was obviously, he thought, some boundary between the microscopic world of atoms and quantum mechanics, and the macroscopic world of cats and classical mechanics.
The Schrödinger's Cat paradox was proposed in 1935 by Edwin Schrodinger, one of the founders of quantum mechanics, as an attempt to visualize the macroscopic realization of a quantum superposition state. A cat is placed in a sealed box together with a vial of poison. A two-state particle (e.g. an electron) is sent into a detector in the box resulting either in a broken or an intact vial and a dead or live cat, respectively. The main problem consists in whether the superposition state of a microscopic particle can be transferred upon the macroscopic cat, that is, whether the cat can exist in a superposition state, being simultaneously dead and alive. Since the standard Copenhagen interpretation is unable to assign any reality to the quantum superposition state, the paradox finds no resolution within the regime of this interpretation. Von Neumann's insistence on the uniform treatment of both microscopic (quantum) and macroscopic (classical) objects according to the laws of quantum mechanics provides a more consistent framework for the resolution of the paradox. In particular, the discovery of the phenomenon of decoherence, whereby the disappearance of the quantum interferences at the macro level is accounted for, suggests the onset of an extremely efficient interference relaxation process (10-23 s) upon the interaction of the two state particle with the detector. As a result, Schrodinger's cat can exist macroscopically either as dead or alive and never as a combination of both. Decoherence not only aids the resolution of the Schrodinger's Cat paradox but also sheds light upon the mechanisms by which the macro-world emerges from the microscopic quantum realm.
Abstract In the Schrödinger cat gedanken experiment a “cat” is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states. There is the apparent interpretation that the “cat” is not in one state or the other, “alive” or “dead”. Here this interpretation is proved objectively. I propose the following definition of macroscopic reality: first, that the “cat” is either dead or alive, the measurement revealing which; second, that measurements on other “cats” some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, “dead” to “alive” and vice versa, to the “cat”. The predictions of quantum mechanics are shown to be incompatible with this premise.
Erwin Schrodinger first described the thought-experiment which has since become known as 'the paradox of Schrodinger's cat' 51 years ago. In recent years, popular accounts of quantum mechanics have tended to adopt one or other of the philosophically most extreme solutions to this paradox, i.e. the consciousness hypothesis or the many worlds interpretation. The author attempts to redress the balance by describing what he takes to be the orthodox solution to the paradox which explains the paradox, without recourse to such counterintuitive notions as a cat simultaneously dead and alive or a universe continually splitting into multiple worlds, as being due to a misapplication of the quantum formalism.
In the Schrödinger-cat gedanken experiment a cat is in a quantum superposition of two macroscopically distinct states, alive and dead.The paradoxical interpretation of quantum mechanics is that the cat is not in one state or the other, alive or dead, immediately prior to its measurement. Because of this apparent defiance of macroscopic reality, quantum superpositions of states macroscopically distinct have generated much interest. Here we address the issue of proving a contradiction with macroscopic reality objectively, through the testable predictions of quantum mechanics. We consider the premises of macroscopic reality (that the ``cat'' is either ``dead'' or ``alive'', the measurement indicating which) and macroscopic locality (that simultaneous measurements some distance away cannot induce the macroscopic change, ``dead'' to ``alive'' and vice versa, to the ``cat''). The predictions of quantum mechanics for certain states, generated using states exhibiting continuous variable entanglement, are shown to be incompatible with the predictions of all theories based on this dual premise. Our proof is along the lines of Bell's theorem, but where all relevant measurements give macroscopically distinct results.