Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Il Nuovo cimento della Società italiana di fisica. B/Il Nuovo cimento B

On Kochen and Specker’s impossibility proof

Roderick I. Sutherland

Published Jun 1, 1982• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/bf02721269

Related papers

A SIMPLE NEW PROOF OF THE KOCHEN-SPECKER PARADOX

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•0 citations

Errors in the No Hidden Variable Proof of Kochen and Specker

Robert W. Latzer

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1976•2 citations

Errors in the no hidden variable proof of Kochen and Specker

Robert W. Latzer

Synthese•Dec 1, 1974•3 citations

Maximally Epistemic Interpretations of the Quantum State and Contextuality

Matthew Leifer, O. J. E. Maroney

We examine the relationship between quantum contextuality (in both the standard Kochen-Specker sense and in the generalized sense proposed by Spekkens) and models of quantum theory in which the quantum state is maximally epistemic. We find that preparation noncontextual models must be maximally epistemic, and these in turn must be Kochen-Specker noncontextual. This implies that the Kochen-Specker theorem is sufficient to establish both the impossibility of maximally epistemic models and the impossibility of preparation noncontextual models. The implication from preparation noncontextual to maximally epistemic then also yields a proof of Bell's theorem from an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-like argument.

arXiv:1208.5132•Physical Review Letters•Mar 20, 2013•92 citations

Logical Reflections on the Kochen-Specker Theorem

John L. Bell

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•7 citations

A probabilistic version of the Kochen-Specker no-hidden-variable proof

Geoffrey Paul Hellman

Synthese•Jul 1, 1980•0 citations
We examine the relationship between quantum contextuality (in both the standard Kochen-Specker sense and in the generalized sense proposed by Spekkens) and models of quantum theory in which the quantum state is maximally epistemic. We find that preparation noncontextual models must be maximally epistemic, and these in turn must be Kochen-Specker noncontextual. This implies that the Kochen-Specker theorem is sufficient to establish both the impossibility of maximally epistemic models and the impossibility of preparation noncontextual models. The implication from preparation noncontextual to maximally epistemic then also yields a proof of Bell's theorem from an Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-like argument.