Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

The ambiguity group for canonical transformations in classical mechanics and its role in their representation in quantum mechanics

M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

Published Apr 6, 2008• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-09238-2_45

Related papers

Canonical transformations and their representations in quantum mechanics

M. Moshińsky

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1977•1 citation

Canonical transformations and their representation in quantum mechanics

M. Moshińsky

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 1981•3 citations

Non linear canonical transformations and their representations in quantum mechanics

M. Moshińsky, Pier A. Mello

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•6 citations

Non-bijective canonical transformations and their representations in quantum mechanics

Peter Krämer, M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

Springer eBooks•Apr 6, 2008•1 citation

Ambiguities in canonical transformations of classical systems and the spectra of quantum observables

M. Moshińsky, T. H. Seligman

Lecture notes in mathematics•Jan 1, 1978•1 citation

Wigner distribution functions and the representation of a non-bijective canonical transformation in quantum mechanics

Rainer Dirl, Peter Kasperkovitz, M. Moshińsky

In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.

Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Apr 21, 1988•15 citations
In a previous paper, with a similar title, the authors showed that for bijective (i.e. one-to-one onto) canonical transformations they can obtain their quantum mechanical representations in the form of a kernel in the phase space of Wigner distribution functions and recover the classical expectation for this kernel in the limit to 0. For non-bijective canonical transformations the situation is more complex as the phase space acquires either a Riemann surface structure or requires the introduction of the concept of an ambiguity group. By discussing the non-bijective canonical transformation taking them from an oscillator of frequency kappa -1 , where kappa is an integer, to one of unit frequency, they see how the kernel is generalised to include the indices associated with the irreducible representations of the ambiguity group, i.e. the ambiguity spins. They obtain the kernel explicitly and show that in the limit to 0 they recover the form that they expect in the Riemann surface picture of their phase space. While they illustrate their analysis through the representation in Wigner distribution phase space of a specific non-bijective canonical transformation, the procedure is clearly extendable to the representations of general canonical transformations of this type.