Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

How could you measure a negative probability

D. Aleksandrov, E. Yu. Nikolskii, B.G. Novatskii, D. N. Stepanov

Published Feb 1, 1994• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Negative probabilities and measurement disturbance

Lars M. Johansen

Bulletin of the American Physical Society•Mar 10, 2008•0 citations

Weak measurements and negative probabilities

Klaus Mølmer

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

Negative probabilities and information gain in weak measurements

Xuanmin Zhu, Qun Wei, Quanhui Liu +1 more

arXiv:1212.6324•Physics Letters A•Jul 19, 2013•5 citations

Weak measurements, non-classicality and negative probability

Sooryansh Asthana, V. Ravishankar

arXiv:2006.12436•Quantum Information Processing•Oct 1, 2021•2 citations

How "negative probabilities" emerge in weak measurements?

Xuanmin Zhu, Qun Wei, Quanhui Liu +1 more

We study the outcomes in a general measurement with postselection, and derive upper bounds for the pointer readings in weak measurement. Using the idea of weak measurement, we study Hardy's gedanken experiment and show how the negative probabilities emerge in weak measurement. By calculating the information gain of the measuring device about which path the particles pass through, we show that the negative probabilities only emerge for cases when the information gain is little due to very weak coupling between the measuring device and the particles. When the coupling strength increases, we can unambiguously determine whether a particle passes through a given path every time, hence the average shifts always represent true probabilities, and the strange negatives probabilities disappear.

•Dec 27, 2012•1 citation

3. Negative probabilities

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

De Gruyter eBooks•Jan 21, 2009•7 citations
We study the outcomes in a general measurement with postselection, and derive upper bounds for the pointer readings in weak measurement. Using the idea of weak measurement, we study Hardy's gedanken experiment and show how the negative probabilities emerge in weak measurement. By calculating the information gain of the measuring device about which path the particles pass through, we show that the negative probabilities only emerge for cases when the information gain is little due to very weak coupling between the measuring device and the particles. When the coupling strength increases, we can unambiguously determine whether a particle passes through a given path every time, hence the average shifts always represent true probabilities, and the strange negatives probabilities disappear.