Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in computer science

Three-Pass Hybrid Key Establishment Protocol Based on ESIGN Signature

Sungmin Lee, Tai-Yun Kim

Published Jan 1, 1999• 1 citation
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-48249-0_39

Related papers

Efficient provably-secure privacy-preserving signature-based key establishment protocol

Dariush Abbasinezhad‐Mood, Arezou Ostad‐Sharif, Morteza Nikooghadam

Ad Hoc Networks•Jan 23, 2020•13 citations

A Provably Secure One-Pass Two-Party Key Establishment Protocol

Konstantinos Chalkias, Spyros T. Halkidis, Dimitrios Hristu‐Varsakelis +2 more

Lecture notes in computer science•Aug 16, 2008•7 citations

Multi-key agreement protocol based on signature scheme

Fei DENG, Jun He

Journal of Computer Applications•May 30, 2013•0 citations

Hybrid Post-Quantum Cryptographic Attestation for Network Management Channels

Alexander W. Smith

Network defense platforms rely on authenticated management channels between sensors, agents, and controllers. These channels are typically secured with TLS using RSA or elliptic-curve public-key primitives that a cryptanalytically relevant quantum computer executing Shor's algorithm will break. The National Security Agency's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 mandates a transition to quantum-resistant cryptography for national security systems between 2030 and 2035, with hybrid classical-and-post-quantum constructions explicitly permitted during the transition. We present a hybrid attestation protocol for network management channels that combines Ed448 with ML-DSA-87 for mutual authentication and X448 with ML-KEM-1024 for session key establishment. An adversary must forge both a classical elliptic-curve signature and a lattice-based signature to impersonate a peer, and must recover both a classical elliptic-curve shared secret and a lattice-based encapsulated secret to decrypt session traffic. Authentication succeeds only when both signature verifications pass; session keys are derived from the concatenation of both shared secrets through HKDF-SHA-512. The protocol supports both trust-on-first-use key management and a PKI-backed enrollment mode under which peer public keys are authenticated by certificate chains from two parallel certificate authorities (Ed448 and ML-DSA-87). Deployments can select either mode, or a hybrid admitting both paths, allowing the protocol to fit air-gapped environments as well as deployments that require cryptographic rather than observational trust establishment. A cryptographic agility mechanism supports algorithm suite negotiation and hot-swap without device re-provisioning. We specify the protocol, analyze its security against classical and quantum adversaries, and report measured performance from a reference implementation in Python: the full handshake including mutual HELLO, hybrid key exchange, and session key derivation completes in approximately 330 milliseconds on commodity hardware using pure-Python post-quantum primitives. The protocol is one component of a larger network defense platform; a full system description appears in a companion paper.

•Apr 22, 2026•0 citations

Hybrid Cryptographic Protocols Providing Digital Signature

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Sep 24, 2014•0 citations

ON THE KEY-COMPROMISE IMPERSONATION VULNERABILITY OF ONE-PASS KEY ESTABLISHMENT PROTOCOLS

K. Chalkias, F. Mpaldimtsi, D. Hristu-Varsakelis +1 more

Abstract: Key establishment protocols are among the most important security mechanisms via which two or more parties can generate a common session key to in order to encrypt their communications over an otherwise insecure network. This paper is concerned with the vulnerability of one-pass two-party key establishment protocols to key-compromise impersonation (K-CI) attacks. The latter may occur once an adversary has obtained the long-term private key of an honest party, and represents a serious — but often underestimated — threat. This is because an entity may not be aware that her computer has been compromised and her private key is exposed, and because a successful impersonation attack may result in far greater harm than the reading of past and future conversations. Our aim is to describe two main classes of K-CI attacks that can be mounted against all of the best-known one-pass protocols, including MQV and HMQV. We show that one of the attacks described can be somewhat avoided (though not completely eliminated) through the combined use of digital signatures and time-stamps; however, there still remains a class of K-CI threats for which there is no obvious solution. 1

International Conference on Security and Cryptography•Jan 1, 2007•10 citations
Network defense platforms rely on authenticated management channels between sensors, agents, and controllers. These channels are typically secured with TLS using RSA or elliptic-curve public-key primitives that a cryptanalytically relevant quantum computer executing Shor's algorithm will break. The National Security Agency's Commercial National Security Algorithm Suite 2.0 mandates a transition to quantum-resistant cryptography for national security systems between 2030 and 2035, with hybrid classical-and-post-quantum constructions explicitly permitted during the transition. We present a hybrid attestation protocol for network management channels that combines Ed448 with ML-DSA-87 for mutual authentication and X448 with ML-KEM-1024 for session key establishment. An adversary must forge both a classical elliptic-curve signature and a lattice-based signature to impersonate a peer, and must recover both a classical elliptic-curve shared secret and a lattice-based encapsulated secret to decrypt session traffic. Authentication succeeds only when both signature verifications pass; session keys are derived from the concatenation of both shared secrets through HKDF-SHA-512. The protocol supports both trust-on-first-use key management and a PKI-backed enrollment mode under which peer public keys are authenticated by certificate chains from two parallel certificate authorities (Ed448 and ML-DSA-87). Deployments can select either mode, or a hybrid admitting both paths, allowing the protocol to fit air-gapped environments as well as deployments that require cryptographic rather than observational trust establishment. A cryptographic agility mechanism supports algorithm suite negotiation and hot-swap without device re-provisioning. We specify the protocol, analyze its security against classical and quantum adversaries, and report measured performance from a reference implementation in Python: the full handshake including mutual HELLO, hybrid key exchange, and session key derivation completes in approximately 330 milliseconds on commodity hardware using pure-Python post-quantum primitives. The protocol is one component of a larger network defense platform; a full system description appears in a companion paper.
Abstract: Key establishment protocols are among the most important security mechanisms via which two or more parties can generate a common session key to in order to encrypt their communications over an otherwise insecure network. This paper is concerned with the vulnerability of one-pass two-party key establishment protocols to key-compromise impersonation (K-CI) attacks. The latter may occur once an adversary has obtained the long-term private key of an honest party, and represents a serious — but often underestimated — threat. This is because an entity may not be aware that her computer has been compromised and her private key is exposed, and because a successful impersonation attack may result in far greater harm than the reading of past and future conversations. Our aim is to describe two main classes of K-CI attacks that can be mounted against all of the best-known one-pass protocols, including MQV and HMQV. We show that one of the attacks described can be somewhat avoided (though not completely eliminated) through the combined use of digital signatures and time-stamps; however, there still remains a class of K-CI threats for which there is no obvious solution. 1