Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Calculations of quantum error correction and fault tolerance thresholds

Jesse Fern

Published Jan 1, 2008• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Microscopic quantum dynamics study on the noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Yuan‐Chung Cheng, R. Silbey

Quantum circuits implementing fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) for the three-qubit bit-flip code and five-qubit code are studied. To describe the effect of noise, we apply a model based on a generalized effective Hamiltonian where the system-environment interactions are taken into account by including stochastic fluctuating terms in the system Hamiltonian. This noise model enables us to investigate the effect of noise in quantum circuits under realistic device conditions and avoid strong assumptions such as maximal parallelism and weak storage errors. Noise thresholds of the QEC codes are calculated. In addition, the effects of imprecision in projective measurements, collective bath, fault-tolerant repetition protocols, and level of parallelism in circuit constructions on the threshold values are also studied with emphasis on determining the optimal design for the fault-tolerant QEC circuit. These results provide insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process as well as useful information for designing the optimal fault-tolerant QEC circuit for particular physical implementation of quantum computer.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412168•Physical Review A•Jul 19, 2005•11 citations

Error-Detection-Based Quantum Fault-Tolerance Threshold

Ben W. Reichardt

Algorithmica•Oct 16, 2007•19 citations

Quantum Error Correction: From Stabilizer Codes to Fault-Tolerance Frontiers — E8 Intelligence Research

Andrew Stewart Caldin

FINDING: Quantum error correction (QEC) is advancing from theoretical stabilizer codes to practical fault-tolerance thresholds, with continuous-time formulations emerging as a key frontier. MATH: - **Stabilizer formalism**: Pauli group \( \mathcal{P}_n \) on \( n \) qubits; code space \( \mathcal{C} = \{|\psi\rangle : S_i|\psi\rangle = |\psi\rangle \ \forall i\} \), with \( S_i \) generators of an abelian subgroup of \( \mathcal{P}_n \). - **Distance & threshold**: A \([[n,k,d]]\) code corrects \( t = \lfloor (d-1)/2 \rfloor \) errors; fault-tolerance threshold \( p_{\text{th}} \approx 10^{-3} \)–\(10^{-2} \) per gate (surface code). - **Continuous-time QEC (CTQEC)**: Master equation \( \dot{\rho} = -i[H,\rho] + \sum_k \gamma_k \mathcal{D}[L_k]\rho \), with weak measurements and feedback; error rate scales as \( \gamma_k \propto (\text{measurement strength})^2 / \text{noise bandwidth} \). - **QuOps metric**: Reliable quantum operations \( \sim 10^3 \)–\(10^4 \) currently; tar Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com

•Aug 23, 2026•0 citations

Fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Ivan B. Djordjević

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Quantum Mechanics

Frank Gaitan

In Chapters 2-5 we gave a detailed presentation of the theory of quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computing. The stage is finally set for a proof of the accuracy threshold theorem [2-9]. As pointed out in Chapter 1, this theorem spells out the conditions under which quantum computing can be done reliably using imperfect quantum gates and in the presence of noise. The proof presented in this chapter follows Ref. [6]. Section 6.1 addresses a number of preliminary topics. It explains why a concatenated quantum error correcting code (QECC) should be used to protect the computational data when fault-tolerance is an issue; it states the principal assumptions underlying the threshold calculations presented in Section 6.2; and finally, it closes with a statement of the accuracy threshold theorem. The proof of this theorem is taken up in Section 6.2. For the error model introduced in Section 6.1, the accuracy threshold is calculated for gates in the Clifford group N(Qn), storage registers, and the Toffoli gate. The calculations make explicit use of the recursive structure of a concatenated QECC and the fault-tolerant procedures introduced in Chapter 5. The theorem is proved by showing that all three cases yield non-zero threshold values.

CRC Press eBooks•Feb 7, 2008•0 citations

Fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Ivan B. Djordjević

Elsevier eBooks•Dec 5, 2025•0 citations
Quantum circuits implementing fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) for the three-qubit bit-flip code and five-qubit code are studied. To describe the effect of noise, we apply a model based on a generalized effective Hamiltonian where the system-environment interactions are taken into account by including stochastic fluctuating terms in the system Hamiltonian. This noise model enables us to investigate the effect of noise in quantum circuits under realistic device conditions and avoid strong assumptions such as maximal parallelism and weak storage errors. Noise thresholds of the QEC codes are calculated. In addition, the effects of imprecision in projective measurements, collective bath, fault-tolerant repetition protocols, and level of parallelism in circuit constructions on the threshold values are also studied with emphasis on determining the optimal design for the fault-tolerant QEC circuit. These results provide insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process as well as useful information for designing the optimal fault-tolerant QEC circuit for particular physical implementation of quantum computer.
FINDING: Quantum error correction (QEC) is advancing from theoretical stabilizer codes to practical fault-tolerance thresholds, with continuous-time formulations emerging as a key frontier. MATH: - **Stabilizer formalism**: Pauli group Pn \mathcal{P}_n Pn​ on n n n qubits; code space C={∣ψ⟩:Si∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩ ∀i} \mathcal{C} = \{|\psi\rangle : S_i|\psi\rangle = |\psi\rangle \ \forall i\} C={∣ψ⟩:Si​∣ψ⟩=∣ψ⟩ ∀i}, with Si S_i Si​ generators of an abelian subgroup of Pn \mathcal{P}_n Pn​. - **Distance & threshold**: A [[n,k,d]][[n,k,d]][[n,k,d]] code corrects t=⌊(d−1)/2⌋ t = \lfloor (d-1)/2 \rfloor t=⌊(d−1)/2⌋ errors; fault-tolerance threshold pth≈10−3 p_{\text{th}} \approx 10^{-3} pth​≈10−3–10−210^{-2} 10−2 per gate (surface code). - **Continuous-time QEC (CTQEC)**: Master equation ρ˙=−i[H,ρ]+∑kγkD[Lk]ρ \dot{\rho} = -i[H,\rho] + \sum_k \gamma_k \mathcal{D}[L_k]\rho ρ˙​=−i[H,ρ]+∑k​γk​D[Lk​]ρ, with weak measurements and feedback; error rate scales as γk∝(measurement strength)2/noise bandwidth \gamma_k \propto (\text{measurement strength})^2 / \text{noise bandwidth} γk​∝(measurement strength)2/noise bandwidth. - **QuOps metric**: Reliable quantum operations ∼103 \sim 10^3 ∼103–10410^4 104 currently; tar Author: Andrew Stewart Caldin, Independent Researcher, UK. Part of the E8 Intelligence Research series. Platform: e8intelligence.com
In Chapters 2-5 we gave a detailed presentation of the theory of quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computing. The stage is finally set for a proof of the accuracy threshold theorem [2-9]. As pointed out in Chapter 1, this theorem spells out the conditions under which quantum computing can be done reliably using imperfect quantum gates and in the presence of noise. The proof presented in this chapter follows Ref. [6]. Section 6.1 addresses a number of preliminary topics. It explains why a concatenated quantum error correcting code (QECC) should be used to protect the computational data when fault-tolerance is an issue; it states the principal assumptions underlying the threshold calculations presented in Section 6.2; and finally, it closes with a statement of the accuracy threshold theorem. The proof of this theorem is taken up in Section 6.2. For the error model introduced in Section 6.1, the accuracy threshold is calculated for gates in the Clifford group N(Qn), storage registers, and the Toffoli gate. The calculations make explicit use of the recursive structure of a concatenated QECC and the fault-tolerant procedures introduced in Chapter 5. The theorem is proved by showing that all three cases yield non-zero threshold values.