Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer series in solid-state sciences

Green’s Functions and Perturbation Theory

Eleftherios N. Economou

Published Jan 1, 1983• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-3-662-02369-3_4

Related papers

Green’s Functions and Perturbation Theory

Springer series in solid-state sciences•Jan 1, 2006•1 citation

Perturbation Theory for Spin Green's Functions

D. I. Kadyrov

Soviet physics. Doklady•Jun 1, 1970•0 citations

Nonsteady perturbation theory for Green's functions

M. N. Aliev

Russian Physics Journal•Aug 1, 1978•0 citations

Nonstandard formulation of perturbation theory for Green's function

M. N. Aliev, V. S. Tagiyev

Russian Physics Journal•Jul 1, 1988•0 citations

Recursive Green's function approach to Feenberg perturbation theory

Ishida, K.

We propose a new procedure by using the recursive Green's functions which remove all the repetition terms from the time-independent perturbation series for finite-level quantum systems. These Green's functions are introduced as a generalization of the Brillouin-Wigner perturbation theory and the calculations of their diagonal elements can naturally give the effective propagators which are equal to the ones in the Feenberg perturbation theory.

arXiv:1904.00957•Apr 1, 2019•0 citations

Why Self-Consistent Diagrammatic Perturbation Theory is `just' Perturbation Theory

Girish S. Setlur

In this short write-up we argue that self-consistent diagrammatic perturbation theory(i.e. Feynman diagrams) for the one-particle Green function is unable to capture some important qualitative features no matter how self-consistently the Green functions are obtained. This write-up is intended to highlight the short-comings of perturbation theory and also tout the advantages of the sea-boson technique(hep-th/9706006).

arXiv:cond-mat/9908269•Aug 19, 1999•0 citations