Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Acta Physica Sinica

Realization of quantum single pendulum on macroscopic level

Bo‐Yuan Ning, Ma Jun-Shan, Zhuang Jun, Ning Xi-Jing, (1)复旦大学光科学与工程系，上海 200433; (2)复旦大学现代物理研究所，上海 200433；教育部应用离子束物理重点实验室; (3)上海理工大学光电信息与计算机工程学院，上海 200093

Published Jan 1, 2010• 1 citation
Publisher

Abstract

Dealing with the motion of single pendulum, classical mechanics shows, by the effective center of mass method, that the pendulum ball performs periodical spatial movement. However, using the same method, quantum mechanics presents a totally different answer: the pendulum ball moves randomly in space without a definite period. We provide the criteria conditions for the two different predictions, and propose the experimental conditions for the ball to obey quantum mechanics. Our results show that it is quite easy with current experimental apparatus to observe the spatial quantum transition of a macroscopic objects of the micrometer-seale.

DOI
10.7498/aps.59.1456

Related papers

Macroscopic Quantum Mechanics in a Classical Spacetime

Huan Yang, Haixing Miao, Da-Shin Lee +2 more

We apply the many-particle Schrödinger-Newton equation, which describes the coevolution of a many-particle quantum wave function and a classical space-time geometry, to macroscopic mechanical objects. By averaging over motions of the objects' internal degrees of freedom, we obtain an effective Schrödinger-Newton equation for their centers of mass, which can be monitored and manipulated at quantum levels by state-of-the-art optomechanics experiments. For a single macroscopic object moving quantum mechanically within a harmonic potential well, its quantum uncertainty is found to evolve at a frequency different from its classical eigenfrequency-with a difference that depends on the internal structure of the object-and can be observable using current technology. For several objects, the Schrödinger-Newton equation predicts semiclassical motions just like Newtonian physics, yet quantum uncertainty cannot be transferred from one object to another.

arXiv:1210.0457•Physical Review Letters•Apr 22, 2013•138 citations

Does quantum mechanics apply to macroscopic objects? How to define macro?

L. Bányai

According to Quantum Mechanics a narrow wave-packet of the center of mass of any macroscopic object should smear out after some time. The problem is usually waved out by assuming that due to their heavy masses this occurs over astronomical times. Without a clear definition of macroscopic objects this remains ambiguous. On the other hand, Quantum Mechanics allows and energetically even prefers largely smeared out c.m. states that never been seen. Why is this the real state of the world we know? Does it suggest a micro-macro threshold with different theoretical descriptions? Does offer micro-miniaturization a hope for answering these questions?

arXiv:2410.17298•Oct 22, 2024•0 citations

Verification of conditional mechanical squeezing for a mg-scale pendulum near quantum regimes

Jordy G. Santiago-Condori, Naoki Yamamoto, Nobuyuki Matsumoto

In quantum mechanics, measurement can be used to prepare a quantum state. This principle is applicable even for macroscopic objects, which may enable us to see classical-quantum transition. Here, we demonstrate conditional mechanical squeezing of a mg-scale suspended mirror (i.e. the center-of-mass mode of a pendulum) near quantum regimes, through continuous linear position measurement and quantum state prediction. The experiment involved the pendulum interacting with photon coherent fields in a detuned optical cavity, which creates an optical spring. Futhermore, the detuned cavity allows us to perform linear position measurement by direct photo-detection of the reflected light. We experimentally verify the conditional squeezing using the theory combining prediction and retrodiction based on the causal and anti-causal filters. As a result, the standard deviation of position and momentum are respectively given by 36 times the zero-point amplitude of position $q_{\rm zpf}$ and 89 times the zero-point amplitude of momentum $p_{\rm zpf}$. The squeezing level achieved is about 5 times closer to the zero-point motion, despite that the mass of the mechanical oscillator is approximately 7 orders of magnitude greater, compared to the previous study. Thus, our demonstration is the first step towards quantum control for massive objects whose mass-scale is high enough to measure gravitational interactions. Such quantum control will pave the way to test quantum mechanics using the center-of-mass mode of massive objects.

arXiv:2008.10848•Aug 25, 2020•0 citations

Crtierion of effective centre-of-mass method in Quantum Mechanics

Bo‐Yuan Ning, Jun Zhuang, Xi‐Jing Ning

In describing the motion of atoms and clusters, we face with choosing quantum mechanics or classical mechanics under different conditions. In principle, there exist two criteria for this choice, but they do contradict in some cases though they are in agreement for other cases. Actually, this problem is closely related with the effective centre-of-mass method, the underlying application of quantum mechanics. It is shown that quantum mechanics must be selected for particle's motion when the de Broglie wave length of the mass centre is larger than the particle size, and in such case the effective centre-of-mass can be used in Quantum Mechanics. In order to test this conclusion, an easy-manufactured experiment is suggested.

arXiv:1105.3800•May 19, 2011•0 citations

The Quantum world

Christian Ngô, J. B. Natowitz

The motion of macroscopic objects such as soccer balls, vehicles and planets can be well described using classical mechanics. However, classical mechanics is inadequate to describe the movements or the structure of microscopic objects such as atoms, molecules or nuclei. To properly describe the properties of microscopic objects, the theory of quantum mechanics was developed. While quantum mechanics can be applied to macroscopic objects, it turns out that for objects of large dimensions the quantum mechanical laws evolve naturally into classical mechanics. In general, solving a problem in quantum mechanics is far more difficult than solving it in classical mechanics. Therefore, the laws of classical mechanics are employed when they can be applied safely.

Routledge eBooks•Oct 1, 2025•0 citations

Experimental undecidability of macroscopic quantumness

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Ravishankar Ramanathan +3 more

Quantum mechanics marks a radical departure from the classical understanding of Nature, fostering an inherent randomness which forbids a deterministic description; yet the most fundamental departure arises from something different. As shown by Bell [1] and Kochen-Specker [2], quantum mechanics portrays a picture of the world in which reality loses its objectivity and is in fact created by observation. Quantum mechanics predicts phenomena which cannot be explained by any theory with objective realism, although our everyday experience supports the hypothesis that macroscopic objects, despite being made of quantum particles, exist independently of the act of observation; in this paper we identify this behavior as classical. Here we show that this seemingly obvious classical behavior of the macroscopic world cannot be experimentally tested and belongs to the realm of ontology similar to the dispute on the interpretations of quantum mechanics [3,4]. For small systems such as a single photon [5] or a pair [6], it has been experimentally proven that a classical description cannot be sustained. Recently, there have also been experiments that claim to have demonstrated quantum behavior of relatively large objects such as interference of fullerenes [7], the violation of Leggett-Garg inequality in Josephson junction [8], and interference between two condensed clouds of atoms [9], which suggest that there is no limit to the size of the system on which the quantum-versus-classical question can be tested. These behaviors, however, are not sufficient to refute classical description in the sense of objective reality. Our findings show that once we reach the regime where an Avogadro number of particles is present, the quantum-versus-classical question cannot be answered experimentally.

arXiv:1111.2696•Nov 11, 2011•2 citations
Dealing with the motion of single pendulum, classical mechanics shows, by the effective center of mass method, that the pendulum ball performs periodical spatial movement. However, using the same method, quantum mechanics presents a totally different answer: the pendulum ball moves randomly in space without a definite period. We provide the criteria conditions for the two different predictions, and propose the experimental conditions for the ball to obey quantum mechanics. Our results show that it is quite easy with current experimental apparatus to observe the spatial quantum transition of a macroscopic objects of the micrometer-seale.
We apply the many-particle Schrödinger-Newton equation, which describes the coevolution of a many-particle quantum wave function and a classical space-time geometry, to macroscopic mechanical objects. By averaging over motions of the objects' internal degrees of freedom, we obtain an effective Schrödinger-Newton equation for their centers of mass, which can be monitored and manipulated at quantum levels by state-of-the-art optomechanics experiments. For a single macroscopic object moving quantum mechanically within a harmonic potential well, its quantum uncertainty is found to evolve at a frequency different from its classical eigenfrequency-with a difference that depends on the internal structure of the object-and can be observable using current technology. For several objects, the Schrödinger-Newton equation predicts semiclassical motions just like Newtonian physics, yet quantum uncertainty cannot be transferred from one object to another.
According to Quantum Mechanics a narrow wave-packet of the center of mass of any macroscopic object should smear out after some time. The problem is usually waved out by assuming that due to their heavy masses this occurs over astronomical times. Without a clear definition of macroscopic objects this remains ambiguous. On the other hand, Quantum Mechanics allows and energetically even prefers largely smeared out c.m. states that never been seen. Why is this the real state of the world we know? Does it suggest a micro-macro threshold with different theoretical descriptions? Does offer micro-miniaturization a hope for answering these questions?
In quantum mechanics, measurement can be used to prepare a quantum state. This principle is applicable even for macroscopic objects, which may enable us to see classical-quantum transition. Here, we demonstrate conditional mechanical squeezing of a mg-scale suspended mirror (i.e. the center-of-mass mode of a pendulum) near quantum regimes, through continuous linear position measurement and quantum state prediction. The experiment involved the pendulum interacting with photon coherent fields in a detuned optical cavity, which creates an optical spring. Futhermore, the detuned cavity allows us to perform linear position measurement by direct photo-detection of the reflected light. We experimentally verify the conditional squeezing using the theory combining prediction and retrodiction based on the causal and anti-causal filters. As a result, the standard deviation of position and momentum are respectively given by 36 times the zero-point amplitude of position qzpfq_{\rm zpf}qzpf​ and 89 times the zero-point amplitude of momentum pzpfp_{\rm zpf}pzpf​. The squeezing level achieved is about 5 times closer to the zero-point motion, despite that the mass of the mechanical oscillator is approximately 7 orders of magnitude greater, compared to the previous study. Thus, our demonstration is the first step towards quantum control for massive objects whose mass-scale is high enough to measure gravitational interactions. Such quantum control will pave the way to test quantum mechanics using the center-of-mass mode of massive objects.
In describing the motion of atoms and clusters, we face with choosing quantum mechanics or classical mechanics under different conditions. In principle, there exist two criteria for this choice, but they do contradict in some cases though they are in agreement for other cases. Actually, this problem is closely related with the effective centre-of-mass method, the underlying application of quantum mechanics. It is shown that quantum mechanics must be selected for particle's motion when the de Broglie wave length of the mass centre is larger than the particle size, and in such case the effective centre-of-mass can be used in Quantum Mechanics. In order to test this conclusion, an easy-manufactured experiment is suggested.
The motion of macroscopic objects such as soccer balls, vehicles and planets can be well described using classical mechanics. However, classical mechanics is inadequate to describe the movements or the structure of microscopic objects such as atoms, molecules or nuclei. To properly describe the properties of microscopic objects, the theory of quantum mechanics was developed. While quantum mechanics can be applied to macroscopic objects, it turns out that for objects of large dimensions the quantum mechanical laws evolve naturally into classical mechanics. In general, solving a problem in quantum mechanics is far more difficult than solving it in classical mechanics. Therefore, the laws of classical mechanics are employed when they can be applied safely.
Quantum mechanics marks a radical departure from the classical understanding of Nature, fostering an inherent randomness which forbids a deterministic description; yet the most fundamental departure arises from something different. As shown by Bell [1] and Kochen-Specker [2], quantum mechanics portrays a picture of the world in which reality loses its objectivity and is in fact created by observation. Quantum mechanics predicts phenomena which cannot be explained by any theory with objective realism, although our everyday experience supports the hypothesis that macroscopic objects, despite being made of quantum particles, exist independently of the act of observation; in this paper we identify this behavior as classical. Here we show that this seemingly obvious classical behavior of the macroscopic world cannot be experimentally tested and belongs to the realm of ontology similar to the dispute on the interpretations of quantum mechanics [3,4]. For small systems such as a single photon [5] or a pair [6], it has been experimentally proven that a classical description cannot be sustained. Recently, there have also been experiments that claim to have demonstrated quantum behavior of relatively large objects such as interference of fullerenes [7], the violation of Leggett-Garg inequality in Josephson junction [8], and interference between two condensed clouds of atoms [9], which suggest that there is no limit to the size of the system on which the quantum-versus-classical question can be tested. These behaviors, however, are not sufficient to refute classical description in the sense of objective reality. Our findings show that once we reach the regime where an Avogadro number of particles is present, the quantum-versus-classical question cannot be answered experimentally.