Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Lecture notes in electrical engineering

Security Weakness of a Dynamic ID-Based User Authentication Scheme with Key Agreement

Mijin Kim, Namje Park, Dongho Won

Published Jan 1, 2012• 7 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-94-007-5699-1_69

Related papers

A secure ID based authenticated key agreement scheme with pairing

Daisuke Moriyama, Jinhui Chao

IEICE technical report. Speech•Mar 10, 2006•2 citations

An Improved and Secure Two-factor Dynamic ID Based Authenticated Key Agreement Scheme for Multiserver Environment

Shreeya Swagatika Sahoo, Sujata Mohanty, Banshidhar Majhi

Wireless Personal Communications•Apr 23, 2018•21 citations

Security Enhancement of an Improved Remote User Authentication Scheme with Key Agreement

Sonam Devgan Kaul, Amit K. Awasthi

Wireless Personal Communications•Apr 13, 2016•56 citations

Security of an Efficient ID-Based Authenticated Key Agreement Protocol from Pairings

Shengbao Wang, Zhenfu Cao, Haiyong Bao

Lecture notes in computer science•Jan 1, 2005•14 citations

Attacks on Young-Hwa An’s Improved Dynamic ID-Based Remote User Authentication Scheme

Cheng Qiang Xu, Zhen Li Zhang

In 2011, Khan et al. analyzed and improved an enhanced secure dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme to overcome the weakness of Wang et al.’s scheme. In 2013, Young-Hwa An showed that Khan et al.’s scheme is not secure because Khan et al.’s scheme can not resist password guessing attack, forgery attack and does not provide user anonymity. After that he proposed a security improvement of dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme with session key agreement to remedy the weakness in Khan et al.’s scheme. Recently, through our study, we have found that Young-Hwa An’s mechanism is not secure enough. There still exists insider user’s attack, anonymity attack and forgery attack.

Applied Mechanics and Materials•May 1, 2014•0 citations

Cryptanalysis of a dynamic ID‐based remote user authentication with key agreement scheme

Hong‐bin Tang, Liu Xin-song

SUMMARY A dynamic user authentication scheme allows a user and a remote server to authenticate each other without leaking the user's identity. In 2011, Wen and Li proposed an improved dynamic ID‐based remote user authentication with key agreement scheme for mobile and home networks. They claimed that their scheme was more secure than the scheme of Wang et al. However, we demonstrate that their scheme is vulnerable to the privileged insider, off‐line password guessing, impersonation, and server spoofing attacks. At the same time, it does not provide any user anonymity and forward secrecy property. Thus, it is not feasible for real‐life implementation.Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

International Journal of Communication Systems•Sep 3, 2012•40 citations
In 2011, Khan et al. analyzed and improved an enhanced secure dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme to overcome the weakness of Wang et al.’s scheme. In 2013, Young-Hwa An showed that Khan et al.’s scheme is not secure because Khan et al.’s scheme can not resist password guessing attack, forgery attack and does not provide user anonymity. After that he proposed a security improvement of dynamic ID-based remote user authentication scheme with session key agreement to remedy the weakness in Khan et al.’s scheme. Recently, through our study, we have found that Young-Hwa An’s mechanism is not secure enough. There still exists insider user’s attack, anonymity attack and forgery attack.
SUMMARY A dynamic user authentication scheme allows a user and a remote server to authenticate each other without leaking the user's identity. In 2011, Wen and Li proposed an improved dynamic ID‐based remote user authentication with key agreement scheme for mobile and home networks. They claimed that their scheme was more secure than the scheme of Wang et al. However, we demonstrate that their scheme is vulnerable to the privileged insider, off‐line password guessing, impersonation, and server spoofing attacks. At the same time, it does not provide any user anonymity and forward secrecy property. Thus, it is not feasible for real‐life implementation.Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.