Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Journal of Computer and System Sciences

Almost tight upper bound for finding Fourier coefficients of bounded pseudo-Boolean functions

Sung-Soon Choi, Kyomin Jung, Jeong Han Kim

Published Sep 1, 2010• 14 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1016/j.jcss.2010.08.011

Related papers

Nearly Optimal Quantum Sample Complexity of Learning Fourier-Sparse Boolean Functions

Zekun Ye

We study the number of uniform quantum examples needed to exactly learn a Boolean function with at most $k$ nonzero Fourier coefficients. We give a learner with near-optimal $\widetilde{O}(k)$ sample complexity independent of the input length $n$. The learner uses only separate measurements of individual examples. This improves the previous $O(k^{3/2}\log^2 k)$ upper bound (Arunachalam, Chakraborty, Lee, Paraashar, and de Wolf, 2021). The main ingredient is a candidate set formed by symmetric differences of subsets from independent groups of Fourier samples. A multilinear majority polynomial combines unbiased random approximations into an accurate witness whose Fourier support lies in this set. Granularity then forces the set to contain the entire Fourier support, including subsets never directly sampled. For comparison, we derive the tight classical sample complexity $Θ(nk)$ by combining known sparse-recovery and lower-bound results.

quant-pharXiv:2610.17648•Oct 14, 2026•0 citations

Periodic Fourier representation of Boolean functions

立平 森, Ryuhei Mori

•May 1, 2019•0 citations

A decomposition method for minimizing quadratic pseudo-Boolean functions

Alain Billionnet, Brigitte Jaumard

Operations Research Letters•Jun 1, 1989•22 citations

Parity Decision Tree Complexity is Greater Than Granularity

Anastasiya Chistopolskaya, Vladimir V. Podolskii

We prove a new lower bound on the parity decision tree complexity $\mathsf{D}_{\oplus}(f)$ of a Boolean function $f$. Namely, granularity of the Boolean function $f$ is the smallest $k$ such that all Fourier coefficients of $f$ are integer multiples of $1/2^k$. We show that $\mathsf{D}_{\oplus}(f)\geq k+1$. This lower bound is an improvement of lower bounds through the sparsity of $f$ and through the degree of $f$ over $\mathbb{F}_2$. Using our lower bound we determine the exact parity decision tree complexity of several important Boolean functions including majority and recursive majority. For majority the complexity is $n - \mathsf{B}(n)+1$, where $\mathsf{B}(n)$ is the number of ones in the binary representation of $n$. For recursive majority the complexity is $\frac{n+1}{2}$. Finally, we provide an example of a function for which our lower bound is not tight. Our results imply new lower bound of $n - \mathsf{B}(n)$ on the multiplicative complexity of majority.

arXiv:1810.08668•Oct 19, 2018•4 citations

A quantum algorithm for approximating the influences of Boolean functions and its applications

Hongwei Li, Li Yang

arXiv:1409.1416•Quantum Information Processing•Mar 4, 2015•31 citations

The Spectrum of Small DeMorgan Formulas.

Anat Ganor, Ilan Komargodski, Ran Raz

We show a connection between the deMorgan formula size of a Boolean function and the noise stability of the function. Using this connection, we show that the Fourier spectrum of any balanced Boolean function computed by a deMorgan formula of size s is concentrated on coefficients of degree up to O( √ s). These results have several applications that apply to any function f that can be computed by a deMorgan formula of size s. First, we get that f can be approximated (in L2-norm) with constant error by a polynomial of degree O( √ s). Second, we show an upper bound of O( √ s) on the average sensitivity of f . Our main result stems from a generalization of Khrapchenko’s bound [Khr71], that might be of independent interest, and some Fourier analysis on the Boolean cube. Previous works prove that any function f : {0, 1}n → {0, 1} that can be computed by a deMorgan formula of size s, can be approximated point-wise by a polynomial of degree O(s/2+o(1)) with constant point-wise error. We note that this result can be easily extended to have a polynomial of degree O(t ·s/2+o(1)) that approximates f with point-wise error 2−t, for any t > 0. This was shown in a long line of results in quantum complexity, including [BBC+01] and [FGG08, ACR+07, RS08, Rei09].

Electronic colloquium on computational complexity•Jan 1, 2012•4 citations
We study the number of uniform quantum examples needed to exactly learn a Boolean function with at most kkk nonzero Fourier coefficients. We give a learner with near-optimal O~(k)\widetilde{O}(k)O(k) sample complexity independent of the input length nnn. The learner uses only separate measurements of individual examples. This improves the previous O(k3/2log⁡2k)O(k^{3/2}\log^2 k)O(k3/2log2k) upper bound (Arunachalam, Chakraborty, Lee, Paraashar, and de Wolf, 2021). The main ingredient is a candidate set formed by symmetric differences of subsets from independent groups of Fourier samples. A multilinear majority polynomial combines unbiased random approximations into an accurate witness whose Fourier support lies in this set. Granularity then forces the set to contain the entire Fourier support, including subsets never directly sampled. For comparison, we derive the tight classical sample complexity Θ(nk)Θ(nk)Θ(nk) by combining known sparse-recovery and lower-bound results.
We prove a new lower bound on the parity decision tree complexity D⊕(f)\mathsf{D}_{\oplus}(f)D⊕​(f) of a Boolean function fff. Namely, granularity of the Boolean function fff is the smallest kkk such that all Fourier coefficients of fff are integer multiples of 1/2k1/2^k1/2k. We show that D⊕(f)≥k+1\mathsf{D}_{\oplus}(f)\geq k+1D⊕​(f)≥k+1. This lower bound is an improvement of lower bounds through the sparsity of fff and through the degree of fff over F2\mathbb{F}_2F2​. Using our lower bound we determine the exact parity decision tree complexity of several important Boolean functions including majority and recursive majority. For majority the complexity is n−B(n)+1n - \mathsf{B}(n)+1n−B(n)+1, where B(n)\mathsf{B}(n)B(n) is the number of ones in the binary representation of nnn. For recursive majority the complexity is n+12\frac{n+1}{2}2n+1​. Finally, we provide an example of a function for which our lower bound is not tight. Our results imply new lower bound of n−B(n)n - \mathsf{B}(n)n−B(n) on the multiplicative complexity of majority.
We show a connection between the deMorgan formula size of a Boolean function and the noise stability of the function. Using this connection, we show that the Fourier spectrum of any balanced Boolean function computed by a deMorgan formula of size s is concentrated on coefficients of degree up to O( √ s). These results have several applications that apply to any function f that can be computed by a deMorgan formula of size s. First, we get that f can be approximated (in L2-norm) with constant error by a polynomial of degree O( √ s). Second, we show an upper bound of O( √ s) on the average sensitivity of f . Our main result stems from a generalization of Khrapchenko’s bound [Khr71], that might be of independent interest, and some Fourier analysis on the Boolean cube. Previous works prove that any function f : {0, 1}n → {0, 1} that can be computed by a deMorgan formula of size s, can be approximated point-wise by a polynomial of degree O(s/2+o(1)) with constant point-wise error. We note that this result can be easily extended to have a polynomial of degree O(t ·s/2+o(1)) that approximates f with point-wise error 2−t, for any t > 0. This was shown in a long line of results in quantum complexity, including [BBC+01] and [FGG08, ACR+07, RS08, Rei09].