Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics: A Crucial Experiment

Luigi Accardi, Massimo Regoli

Published Jan 1, 2002• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4615-0591-4_1

Related papers

Probability and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Arthur I. Fine

The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science•Mar 1, 1973•73 citations

Understanding Popper’s experiment

Tabish Qureshi

An experiment proposed by Karl Popper is considered by many to be a crucial test of quantum mechanics. Although many loopholes in the original proposal have been pointed out, they are not crucial to the test. We use only the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics to point out what is fundamentally wrong with the proposal, and demonstrate that Popper’s basic premise was faulty.

arXiv:quant-ph/0405057•American Journal of Physics•May 13, 2005•18 citations

The Probability Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Bryce de Witt

•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Understanding Popper's Experiment

Qureshi, T

An experiment, proposed by Karl Popper, is considered by many, to be a crucial test of quantum mechanics. While many loop holes have been pointed out in the original proposal, it turned out that they are not crucial to the test. We point out what is fundamentally wrong with the proposal. Using just the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, we demonstrate that Popper's basic premise was faulty.

•Jan 1, 2004•13 citations

Lakatos on Crucial Experiments and the History of Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics

Péter Szegedi

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics and Probability

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS eBooks•Feb 28, 2016•0 citations