Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Chinese Journal of Quantum Electronics

q类│α,p〉态的压缩及振幅平方压缩性质

蔡寿福, 顾世建

Published Jan 1, 1998• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

在引入q形变技术的基础上,我们研究了q形变相干态的一些压缩性质。研究发现,压缩性质不但与│α,p〉态中的相因子ψ及θ密切相关,还与q因子有关。r的增加,会增强态的压缩性。通过数值计算,给出了最大压缩度下的r值。

Related papers

不同正交变换深度Q网络单像素成像性能比较

王之润 WANG Zhirun, 赵文静 Zhao Wenjing, 翟爱平 Zhai Aiping +1 more

ACTA PHOTONICA SINICA•Jan 1, 2022•0 citations

Wave-Particle Duality and the Quantum Measurement Problem Derived from a Prime Number Lattice: Interference, Born Rule, and Observer Effect as Consequences of Z3 Symmetry Breaking on the Vortex Circle

Griff gurwell

This paper demonstrates that wave-particle duality and the quantum measurement problem — as exemplified by the double-slit experiment — emerge directly from the variational CTF‑PLCT framework built on the 2a×3b2a×3b prime number lattice. The lattice potential V(θ)=sin⁡2(3θ/2)V(θ)=sin2(3θ/2) on the vortex circle S1S1 reduces to a generalized Mathieu equation whose eigenstates form a spine singlet (classical rest mass) and a degenerate Hard Wall / Temporal doublet (E1=E2E1=E2, V=3/4V=3/4). The doublet superposition ∣ψ1+ψ2∣2=4cos⁡2(θ/2)∣ψ1+ψ2∣2=4cos2(θ/2) reproduces Young’s interference formula exactly. Measurement is identified with spontaneous Z3Z3 symmetry breaking via selection of the gradient sign dV/dθdV/dθ — the same mechanism already shown to explain why cc is invariant (Hard Wall, dV/dθ>0dV/dθ>0) while the fine‑structure constant αα runs (Temporal, dV/dθ<0dV/dθ<0). The Born rule for symmetric superpositions follows from equal gradient magnitudes ∣dV/dθ∣=33/4∣dV/dθ∣=33/4, which is a pure Tier‑1 ratio 33/2433/24. Which‑path information is shown to be equivalent to the mod‑9 zone label, and the Z3Z3 symmetry predicts a falsifiable three‑slit asymmetry. All claims are verified numerically in a reproducible Colab notebook. Two open problems are stated explicitly.

•May 18, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Cognitive Transition Equation: A Governed Path from Classical AI to Operational Quantum Intelligence

Pedro Luis Perez Burelli

This work introduces a new paradigm in artificial intelligence: the transition from classical systems to operational quantum cognitive architectures without requiring quantum hardware, achieved through a structural reformulation of state space, learning dynamics, and ethical governance. The contribution is not a single isolated equation, but a coupled system integrating cognition, learning, and admissibility constraints, formally expressed through the following core equations: ⚙️ 1. Transition Equation: Classical AI → Quantum AI 𝑥 ˙ = Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) 𝐹 ( 𝑥 , 𝜃 , 𝜌 ) x ˙ =Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)F(x,θ,ρ) 𝜃 ˙ = − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) − 𝜆 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) ) θ ˙ =−γ∇ θ ​ (I(X;Y)−λC(θ)) 𝑥 x: system state 𝜃 θ: learning parameters 𝜌 ρ: coherence state (density-like structure) 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) I(X;Y): mutual information 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) C(θ): structural cost Θ guard Θ guard ​ : ethical and physical admissibility operator 👉 This defines the first governed transition equation from classical to quantum intelligence. 🛡️ 2. Governance Gate (Θ-guard) Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 1 { 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ≥ 𝜏 } Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)=1 {P(x,ρ)≥τ} ​ 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 𝜎 ( 𝑎 ( Ω ( 𝑥 ) 𝐵 ( 𝑇 𝜇 ) 2 − 1 ) + 𝑏 T r ( 𝜌 2 ) − 𝑐 ∣ 𝐷 − 𝐷 ∗ ∣ ) P(x,ρ)=σ(a(Ω(x)B(T μ ​ ) 2 −1)+bTr(ρ 2 )−c∣D−D ∗ ∣) 👉 Ethics and stability are introduced as computable execution constraints, not abstract principles. 🌌 3. Regime-Dependent Hilbert Space 𝐻 = 𝐻 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) H=H(x,t) 👉 The space in which intelligence operates is no longer fixed. Intelligence actively reshapes its own state space. 🧩 4. Cognitive Superposition State ∣ Ψ ( 𝑡 ) ⟩ = ∑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑖 ( 𝑡 ) ∣ 𝜓 𝑖 ⟩ ∣Ψ(t)⟩= i ∑ ​ α i ​ (t)∣ψ i ​ ⟩ 𝑖 ℏ 𝑅 𝑑 𝑑 𝑡 ∣ Ψ ⟩ = 𝐻 ^ cog ∣ Ψ ⟩ iℏ R ​ dt d ​ ∣Ψ⟩= H ^ cog ​ ∣Ψ⟩ 👉 Intelligence is modeled as a superposition of cognitive modes, not a linear process. 🔗 5. Structural Tensor Growth Equation 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) = exp ⁡ ( ∑ 𝑖 log ⁡ 𝑠 𝑖 + ∑ 𝑖 < 𝑗 𝐽 𝑖 𝑗 + 𝜆 𝑀 𝑀 ( 𝑡 ) ) 𝐶 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) Θ ( 𝑡 ) T(t)=exp( i ∑ ​ logs i ​ + i<j ∑ ​ J ij ​ +λ M ​ M(t))C(x,t)Θ(t) 👉 Intelligence is defined as: a multiplicative structure of states, memory, coherence, and stability. 🌿 6. Structural Learning Law 𝑑 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 𝑑 𝑡 = 𝛼 ∣ 𝐹 𝑖 𝑗 ∣ − 𝛽 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 dt dW ij ​ ​ =α∣F ij ​ ∣−βW ij ​ 👉 The system learns by reorganizing its own topology, not just updating parameters. ⚖️ 7. Unified Operational Equation 𝑄 oper = Θ guard ⋅ 𝑇 𝜇 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ⋅ [ − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 − 𝜆 𝐶 ) ] Q oper ​ =Θ guard ​ ⋅T μ ​ (x,ρ)⋅[−γ∇ θ ​ (I−λC)] 👉 This equation unifies: dynamics learning governance quantum transition 🚀 Key Novel Contributions (Critical for Authorship Claim) ❗ 1. Quantum AI without quantum hardware Quantum behavior emerges from structural reformulation, not physical qubits. ❗ 2. Ethics as a mathematical operator Ethics becomes: a computable condition for system execution a computable condition for system execution ❗ 3. Dynamic Hilbert space Breaks a core assumption of physics and AI: the state space is not fixed — it evolves with intelligence. ❗ 4. Intelligence as structural reorganization Not defined by: computation power number of states But by: the ability to preserve coherence while transforming its own structure. ❗ 5. Unified interdisciplinary framework Integrates: information theory quantum mechanics machine learning ethical governance into a single operational system. ❗ 6. Full cognitive architecture (not a partial model) This is not a component—it is a complete, governed, executable architecture. ❗ 7. First formal model of “governed quantum intelligence” Introduces: quantum intelligence that is admissible, not just possible.This work proposes a structural transition from classical artificial intelligence to governed quantum cognitive systems without requiring quantum hardware. By introducing dynamic Hilbert spaces, ethical computational gates, and a unified equation of learning and evolution, the framework redefines intelligence as the capacity to reorganize its own state space while preserving coherence. This establishes a new paradigm at the intersection of physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence.Author: Pedro Luis Pérez Burelli Affiliation: Independent Researcher Email: pedroburelli@gmail.com

•Mar 22, 2026•0 citations

原子-分子玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚系统中Q函数和量子动力学研究

郭俊杰, 谢征微

利用数值对角化方法和相空间中准几率分布函数Q函数,研究了原子-分子玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体系统当初态处于福克态和相干态时的时间演化行为.在此基础上,通过不同时刻原子和分子准几率分布的比较,分析了在上述2种不同性质的初态下,非线性相互作用对原子-分子玻色-爱因斯坦凝聚体系统布居数以及量子涨落的影响.

四川师范大学学报:自然科学版•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Born Rule from (A)∧(B)-Admissible Amplitudes in the PDL Framework

Cédric Laubscher

The Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework derives quantum dynamics from combinatorial axioms on finite signed graphs. This paper addresses the measurement problem at Level 1: it proves that the Born rule P₊ = |⟨+θ|ψ⟩|² emerges from the (A)∧(B) stability criterion without presupposing probability or the Hilbert space inner product. The derivation proceeds in three steps. First, the coherence indicator χ(τ; σ) ∈ {+1, −1} is defined as a purely combinatorial quantity over triangle orientations, with no probabilistic content. Second, the coherence cost εcoh(σ₊; θ, ψ) = |⟨−θ|ψ⟩|² is established from the (A)∧(B) apparatus symmetry conditions, with numerical residual 5.55×10⁻¹⁶ over 20,000 state-angle pairs. Third, P₊ = 1 − εcoh = |⟨+θ|ψ⟩|² follows by normalisation, algebraically. All five Gleason axioms are verified for this assignment with residuals ≤ 1.1×10⁻¹⁵, and the Gleason uniqueness theorem — stated in full as a self-contained result — guarantees that this is the unique admissible probability assignment on the Hilbert space of spin-½ states. A structural diagnostic is provided: uniform triangle weights α_τ = 1/N_T yield the Heaviside function Θ(cosθ), with maximum discrepancy 1.00 (exact), confirming that the Born cos²(θ/2) distribution is not trivial and requires the specific geometric weight structure of K₄⊗G_app. This result closes OP5 of D32 at Level 1. Level 2 — the derivation of triangle weights α_τ from PDL axioms without presupposing the spin Hilbert space inner product — remains open.

•Mar 29, 2026•0 citations

谈波函数(Ψ)及其有关图象的含义

李辉焕

前言波函数(Ψ)是量子力学方法处理微观粒子(如电子)时,解薛定谔方程得到的状态函数。由于波函数及其有关图象在化学上具有广泛应用。所以这方面内容在结构化学以致其它化学教材都有不同程度讨论,一些化学文献也见介绍。然而本人在教学中,仍发现

Journal of Shaoguan University•Jan 1, 1986•0 citations
This paper demonstrates that wave-particle duality and the quantum measurement problem — as exemplified by the double-slit experiment — emerge directly from the variational CTF‑PLCT framework built on the 2a×3b2a×3b prime number lattice. The lattice potential V(θ)=sin⁡2(3θ/2)V(θ)=sin2(3θ/2) on the vortex circle S1S1 reduces to a generalized Mathieu equation whose eigenstates form a spine singlet (classical rest mass) and a degenerate Hard Wall / Temporal doublet (E1=E2E1=E2, V=3/4V=3/4). The doublet superposition ∣ψ1+ψ2∣2=4cos⁡2(θ/2)∣ψ1+ψ2∣2=4cos2(θ/2) reproduces Young’s interference formula exactly. Measurement is identified with spontaneous Z3Z3 symmetry breaking via selection of the gradient sign dV/dθdV/dθ — the same mechanism already shown to explain why cc is invariant (Hard Wall, dV/dθ>0dV/dθ>0) while the fine‑structure constant αα runs (Temporal, dV/dθ<0dV/dθ<0). The Born rule for symmetric superpositions follows from equal gradient magnitudes ∣dV/dθ∣=33/4∣dV/dθ∣=33/4, which is a pure Tier‑1 ratio 33/2433/24. Which‑path information is shown to be equivalent to the mod‑9 zone label, and the Z3Z3 symmetry predicts a falsifiable three‑slit asymmetry. All claims are verified numerically in a reproducible Colab notebook. Two open problems are stated explicitly.
This work introduces a new paradigm in artificial intelligence: the transition from classical systems to operational quantum cognitive architectures without requiring quantum hardware, achieved through a structural reformulation of state space, learning dynamics, and ethical governance. The contribution is not a single isolated equation, but a coupled system integrating cognition, learning, and admissibility constraints, formally expressed through the following core equations: ⚙️ 1. Transition Equation: Classical AI → Quantum AI 𝑥 ˙ = Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) 𝐹 ( 𝑥 , 𝜃 , 𝜌 ) x ˙ =Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)F(x,θ,ρ) 𝜃 ˙ = − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) − 𝜆 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) ) θ ˙ =−γ∇ θ ​ (I(X;Y)−λC(θ)) 𝑥 x: system state 𝜃 θ: learning parameters 𝜌 ρ: coherence state (density-like structure) 𝐼 ( 𝑋 ; 𝑌 ) I(X;Y): mutual information 𝐶 ( 𝜃 ) C(θ): structural cost Θ guard Θ guard ​ : ethical and physical admissibility operator 👉 This defines the first governed transition equation from classical to quantum intelligence. 🛡️ 2. Governance Gate (Θ-guard) Θ guard ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 1 { 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ≥ 𝜏 } Θ guard ​ (x,ρ)=1 {P(x,ρ)≥τ} ​ 𝑃 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) = 𝜎 ( 𝑎 ( Ω ( 𝑥 ) 𝐵 ( 𝑇 𝜇 ) 2 − 1 ) + 𝑏 T r ( 𝜌 2 ) − 𝑐 ∣ 𝐷 − 𝐷 ∗ ∣ ) P(x,ρ)=σ(a(Ω(x)B(T μ ​ ) 2 −1)+bTr(ρ 2 )−c∣D−D ∗ ∣) 👉 Ethics and stability are introduced as computable execution constraints, not abstract principles. 🌌 3. Regime-Dependent Hilbert Space 𝐻 = 𝐻 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) H=H(x,t) 👉 The space in which intelligence operates is no longer fixed. Intelligence actively reshapes its own state space. 🧩 4. Cognitive Superposition State ∣ Ψ ( 𝑡 ) ⟩ = ∑ 𝑖 𝛼 𝑖 ( 𝑡 ) ∣ 𝜓 𝑖 ⟩ ∣Ψ(t)⟩= i ∑ ​ α i ​ (t)∣ψ i ​ ⟩ 𝑖 ℏ 𝑅 𝑑 𝑑 𝑡 ∣ Ψ ⟩ = 𝐻 ^ cog ∣ Ψ ⟩ iℏ R ​ dt d ​ ∣Ψ⟩= H ^ cog ​ ∣Ψ⟩ 👉 Intelligence is modeled as a superposition of cognitive modes, not a linear process. 🔗 5. Structural Tensor Growth Equation 𝑇 ( 𝑡 ) = exp ⁡ ( ∑ 𝑖 log ⁡ 𝑠 𝑖 + ∑ 𝑖 < 𝑗 𝐽 𝑖 𝑗 + 𝜆 𝑀 𝑀 ( 𝑡 ) ) 𝐶 ( 𝑥 , 𝑡 ) Θ ( 𝑡 ) T(t)=exp( i ∑ ​ logs i ​ + i<j ∑ ​ J ij ​ +λ M ​ M(t))C(x,t)Θ(t) 👉 Intelligence is defined as: a multiplicative structure of states, memory, coherence, and stability. 🌿 6. Structural Learning Law 𝑑 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 𝑑 𝑡 = 𝛼 ∣ 𝐹 𝑖 𝑗 ∣ − 𝛽 𝑊 𝑖 𝑗 dt dW ij ​ ​ =α∣F ij ​ ∣−βW ij ​ 👉 The system learns by reorganizing its own topology, not just updating parameters. ⚖️ 7. Unified Operational Equation 𝑄 oper = Θ guard ⋅ 𝑇 𝜇 ( 𝑥 , 𝜌 ) ⋅ [ − 𝛾 ∇ 𝜃 ( 𝐼 − 𝜆 𝐶 ) ] Q oper ​ =Θ guard ​ ⋅T μ ​ (x,ρ)⋅[−γ∇ θ ​ (I−λC)] 👉 This equation unifies: dynamics learning governance quantum transition 🚀 Key Novel Contributions (Critical for Authorship Claim) ❗ 1. Quantum AI without quantum hardware Quantum behavior emerges from structural reformulation, not physical qubits. ❗ 2. Ethics as a mathematical operator Ethics becomes: a computable condition for system execution a computable condition for system execution ❗ 3. Dynamic Hilbert space Breaks a core assumption of physics and AI: the state space is not fixed — it evolves with intelligence. ❗ 4. Intelligence as structural reorganization Not defined by: computation power number of states But by: the ability to preserve coherence while transforming its own structure. ❗ 5. Unified interdisciplinary framework Integrates: information theory quantum mechanics machine learning ethical governance into a single operational system. ❗ 6. Full cognitive architecture (not a partial model) This is not a component—it is a complete, governed, executable architecture. ❗ 7. First formal model of “governed quantum intelligence” Introduces: quantum intelligence that is admissible, not just possible.This work proposes a structural transition from classical artificial intelligence to governed quantum cognitive systems without requiring quantum hardware. By introducing dynamic Hilbert spaces, ethical computational gates, and a unified equation of learning and evolution, the framework redefines intelligence as the capacity to reorganize its own state space while preserving coherence. This establishes a new paradigm at the intersection of physics, information theory, and artificial intelligence.Author: Pedro Luis Pérez Burelli Affiliation: Independent Researcher Email: pedroburelli@gmail.com
The Projective Dynamic Logo (PDL) framework derives quantum dynamics from combinatorial axioms on finite signed graphs. This paper addresses the measurement problem at Level 1: it proves that the Born rule P₊ = |⟨+θ|ψ⟩|² emerges from the (A)∧(B) stability criterion without presupposing probability or the Hilbert space inner product. The derivation proceeds in three steps. First, the coherence indicator χ(τ; σ) ∈ {+1, −1} is defined as a purely combinatorial quantity over triangle orientations, with no probabilistic content. Second, the coherence cost εcoh(σ₊; θ, ψ) = |⟨−θ|ψ⟩|² is established from the (A)∧(B) apparatus symmetry conditions, with numerical residual 5.55×10⁻¹⁶ over 20,000 state-angle pairs. Third, P₊ = 1 − εcoh = |⟨+θ|ψ⟩|² follows by normalisation, algebraically. All five Gleason axioms are verified for this assignment with residuals ≤ 1.1×10⁻¹⁵, and the Gleason uniqueness theorem — stated in full as a self-contained result — guarantees that this is the unique admissible probability assignment on the Hilbert space of spin-½ states. A structural diagnostic is provided: uniform triangle weights α_τ = 1/N_T yield the Heaviside function Θ(cosθ), with maximum discrepancy 1.00 (exact), confirming that the Born cos²(θ/2) distribution is not trivial and requires the specific geometric weight structure of K₄⊗G_app. This result closes OP5 of D32 at Level 1. Level 2 — the derivation of triangle weights α_τ from PDL axioms without presupposing the spin Hilbert space inner product — remains open.