Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Quantum query algorithms and lower bounds

Andris Ambainis

Published Nov 2, 2007• 26 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-1-4020-2776-5_2

Related papers

On quantum database search algorithms

김정산

•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Quantum lower bounds by quantum arguments

Andris Ambainis

We propose a new method for proving lower bounds on quantum query algorithms. Instead of a classical adversary that runs the algorithm with one input and then modifies the input, we use a quantum adversary that runs the algorithm with a superposition of inputs. If the algorithm works correctly, its state becomes entangled with the superposition over inputs. We bound the number of queries needed to achieve a sufficient entanglement and this implies a lower bound on the number of queries for the computation. Using this method, we prove two new $Ω(\sqrt{N})$ lower bounds on computing AND of ORs and inverting a permutation and also provide more uniform proofs for several known lower bounds which have been previously proven via variety of different techniques.

arXiv:quant-ph/0002066•Feb 24, 2000•13 citations

Quantum search algorithms

Christoph Dürr, xb b b

•Jan 1, 2005•16 citations

Simple vertex coloring algorithms

Morris, Jackson, Fang Song

Given a graph $G$ with $n$ vertices and maximum degree $Δ$, it is known that $G$ admits a vertex coloring with $Δ+ 1$ colors such that no edge of $G$ is monochromatic. This can be seen constructively by a simple greedy algorithm, which runs in time $O(nΔ)$. Very recently, a sequence of results (e.g., [Assadi et. al. SODA'19, Bera et. al. ICALP'20, Alon Assadi Approx/Random'20]) show randomized algorithms for $(ε+ 1)Δ$-coloring in the query model making $\tilde{O}(n\sqrt{n})$ queries, improving over the greedy strategy on dense graphs. In addition, a lower bound of $Ω(n\sqrt n)$ for any $O(Δ)$-coloring is established on general graphs. In this work, we give a simple algorithm for $(1 + ε)Δ$-coloring. This algorithm makes $O(ε^{-1/2}n\sqrt{n})$ queries, which matches the best existing algorithms as well as the classical lower bound for sufficiently large $ε$. Additionally, it can be readily adapted to a quantum query algorithm making $\tilde{O}(ε^{-1}n^{4/3})$ queries, bypassing the classical lower bound. Complementary to these algorithmic results, we show a quantum lower bound of $Ω(n)$ for $O(Δ)$-coloring.

arXiv:2102.07089•Feb 14, 2021•0 citations

Quantum Search Algorithms

Uwe Schöning, Randall J. Pruim

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1998•0 citations

Tight bounds for hybrid quantum-classical query algorithms

Andris Ambainis, András Gilyén, Martins Kokainis

We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most $q$ oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})$ queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision $ε$ requires $Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})$ queries; (iii) Search among $N$ items requires $Θ(\frac{N}{q})$ queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of $m$ ORs, with $n$ inputs to each OR) requires $Θ(\frac{nm}{q})$ queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all $q$ from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to $Q(f)$, the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2610.06803•Oct 6, 2026•0 citations
We propose a new method for proving lower bounds on quantum query algorithms. Instead of a classical adversary that runs the algorithm with one input and then modifies the input, we use a quantum adversary that runs the algorithm with a superposition of inputs. If the algorithm works correctly, its state becomes entangled with the superposition over inputs. We bound the number of queries needed to achieve a sufficient entanglement and this implies a lower bound on the number of queries for the computation. Using this method, we prove two new Ω(N)Ω(\sqrt{N})Ω(N​) lower bounds on computing AND of ORs and inverting a permutation and also provide more uniform proofs for several known lower bounds which have been previously proven via variety of different techniques.
Given a graph GGG with nnn vertices and maximum degree ΔΔΔ, it is known that GGG admits a vertex coloring with Δ+1Δ+ 1Δ+1 colors such that no edge of GGG is monochromatic. This can be seen constructively by a simple greedy algorithm, which runs in time O(nΔ)O(nΔ)O(nΔ). Very recently, a sequence of results (e.g., [Assadi et. al. SODA'19, Bera et. al. ICALP'20, Alon Assadi Approx/Random'20]) show randomized algorithms for (ε+1)Δ(ε+ 1)Δ(ε+1)Δ-coloring in the query model making O~(nn)\tilde{O}(n\sqrt{n})O~(nn​) queries, improving over the greedy strategy on dense graphs. In addition, a lower bound of Ω(nn)Ω(n\sqrt n)Ω(nn​) for any O(Δ)O(Δ)O(Δ)-coloring is established on general graphs. In this work, we give a simple algorithm for (1+ε)Δ(1 + ε)Δ(1+ε)Δ-coloring. This algorithm makes O(ε−1/2nn)O(ε^{-1/2}n\sqrt{n})O(ε−1/2nn​) queries, which matches the best existing algorithms as well as the classical lower bound for sufficiently large εεε. Additionally, it can be readily adapted to a quantum query algorithm making O~(ε−1n4/3)\tilde{O}(ε^{-1}n^{4/3})O~(ε−1n4/3) queries, bypassing the classical lower bound. Complementary to these algorithmic results, we show a quantum lower bound of Ω(n)Ω(n)Ω(n) for O(Δ)O(Δ)O(Δ)-coloring.
We study hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the query model. The computation consists of quantum subroutines that make at most qqq oracle queries; between subroutines, all qubits are measured and discarded. We prove matching upper and lower bounds for several problems in this model: (i) (Unbiased) Phase estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(1qε2)Θ(\frac{1}{q ε^2})Θ(qε21​) queries; (ii) (Unbiased) Amplitude estimation up to a precision εεε requires Θ(p(1−p)qε2)Θ(\frac{p(1-p)}{q ε^2})Θ(qε2p(1−p)​) queries; (iii) Search among NNN items requires Θ(Nq)Θ(\frac{N}{q})Θ(qN​) queries; (iv) Two level AND-OR tree (AND of mmm ORs, with nnn inputs to each OR) requires Θ(nmq)Θ(\frac{nm}{q})Θ(qnm​) queries. All of these bounds are optimal up to a constant factor, for all qqq from 1, corresponding to the classical complexity, to Q(f)Q(f)Q(f), the unrestricted quantum query complexity of the respective problem. We also derive a hybrid lower bound for distinguishing two distributions specified by a state-preparation unitary; this bound is tight up to a logarithmic factor. Besides specific lower bounds, an important contribution is developing methods for proving lower bounds on hybrid quantum algorithms (which have been very ad-hoc up to now). The first two bounds follow from a common framework: we analyze probability distributions over measurement transcripts and bound a progress measure that captures their distinguishability. The AND-OR bound requires a more delicate argument, combining two progress measures that track the information available to the algorithm classically and in quantum form, respectively.