Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

International Journal of Theoretical Physics

Concrete Quantum Logics

Pavel Pták

Published Mar 1, 2000• 25 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1023/a:1003626929648

Related papers

Concrete and abstract quantum computational logics

María Luisa Dalla Chiara, Roberto Giuntini, Roberto Leporini

•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

Concrete quantum logics with covering properties

Vladimir M�ller, Pavel Pt�k, Josef Tkadlec

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•May 1, 1992•14 citations

Quantum Logics

Richard J. Greechie, Stanley Gudder

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1973•41 citations

On the concreteness of quantum logics

Pavel Pták, J. D. Maitland Wright

It is shown that for any quantum logic $L$ one can find a concrete logic $K$ and a surjective homomorphism $f$ from $K$ onto $L$ such that $f$ maps the centre of $K$ onto the centre of $L$. Moreover, one can ensure that each finite set of compatible elements in $L$ is the image of a compatible subset of $K$. This result is "best possible" - let a logic $L$ be the homomorphic image of a concrete logic under a homomorphism such that, if $F$ is a finite subset of the pre-image of a compatible subset of $L$, then $F$ is compatible. Then $L$ must be concrete. In the second part one considers embeddings into concrete logics. It is shown that any concrete logic can be embedded into a concrete logic with preassigned centre and an abundance of two-valued measures. Finally, one proves that an arbitrary logic can be mapped into a concrete logic by a centrally additive mapping which preserves the ordering and complementation.

Applications of Mathematics•Jan 1, 1985•8 citations

Quantum Logics

Richard J. Greechie, Stanley Gudder

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1975•3 citations

Quantum Logics with Lattice State Spaces

Jiří Binder, Mirko Navara

Let $L$ be a quantum logic and let $S(L)$ denote the set of all states on $L$. (By a state we mean a nonnegative bounded $\sigma$-additive measure, not necessarily normalized.) We ask whether every logic whose state space is a lattice has to be Boolean. We prove that this is so for finite logics and "projection logics." On the other hand, we show that there exist even concrete non-Boolean logics with a lattice state space (in fact, we prove that every countable concrete logic can be enlarged to a logic with a lattice state space). In the appendix we shortly consider the lattice properties of the set of observables and correct the paper [10].

Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society•Jan 1, 1987•5 citations
It is shown that for any quantum logic LLL one can find a concrete logic KKK and a surjective homomorphism fff from KKK onto LLL such that fff maps the centre of KKK onto the centre of LLL. Moreover, one can ensure that each finite set of compatible elements in LLL is the image of a compatible subset of KKK. This result is "best possible" - let a logic LLL be the homomorphic image of a concrete logic under a homomorphism such that, if FFF is a finite subset of the pre-image of a compatible subset of LLL, then FFF is compatible. Then LLL must be concrete. In the second part one considers embeddings into concrete logics. It is shown that any concrete logic can be embedded into a concrete logic with preassigned centre and an abundance of two-valued measures. Finally, one proves that an arbitrary logic can be mapped into a concrete logic by a centrally additive mapping which preserves the ordering and complementation.
Let LLL be a quantum logic and let S(L)S(L)S(L) denote the set of all states on LLL. (By a state we mean a nonnegative bounded σ\sigmaσ-additive measure, not necessarily normalized.) We ask whether every logic whose state space is a lattice has to be Boolean. We prove that this is so for finite logics and "projection logics." On the other hand, we show that there exist even concrete non-Boolean logics with a lattice state space (in fact, we prove that every countable concrete logic can be enlarged to a logic with a lattice state space). In the appendix we shortly consider the lattice properties of the set of observables and correct the paper [10].