Cambridge University Press eBooks

Coherent states

Christopher C. Gerry, P. L. Knight

Published Oct 28, 2004• 1 citation

Abstract

At the end of the preceding chapter, we showed that the photon number states | n 〉 have a uniform phase distribution over the range 0 to 2π. Essentially, then, there is no well-defined phase for these states and, as we have already shown, the expectation value of the field operator for a number state vanishes. It is frequently suggested (see, for example, Sakurai) that the classical limit of the quantized field is the limit in which the number of photons becomes very large such that the number operator becomes a continuous variable. However, this cannot be the whole story since the mean field 〈 n | Ê x | n 〉 = 0 no matter how large the value of n . We know that at a fixed point in space a classical field oscillates sinusoidally in time. Clearly this does not happen for the expectation value of the field operator for a number state. In this chapter we present a set of states, the coherent states, which do give rise to a sensible classical limit; and, in fact, these states are the “most classical” quantum states of a harmonic oscillator, as we shall see. Eigenstates of the annihilation operator and minimum uncertainty states In order to have a non-zero expectation value of the electric field operator or, equivalently, of the annihilation and creation operators, we are required to have a superposition of number states differing only by ±1.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511791239.003

Related papers

Coherent and squeezed states of the radiation field

Marlan O. Scully, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy

Following the development of the quantum theory of radiation and with the advent of the laser, the states of the field that most nearly describe a classical electromagnetic field were widely studied. In order to realize such ‘classical’ states, we will consider the field generated by a classical monochromatic current, and find that the quantum state thus generated has many interesting properties and deserves to be called a coherent state . An important consequence of the quantization of the radiation field is the associated uncertainty relation for the conjugate field variables. It therefore appears reasonable to propose that the wave function which corresponds most closely to the classical field must have minimum uncertainty for all times subject to the appropriate simple harmonic potential. In this chapter we show that a displaced simple harmonic oscillator ground state wave function satisfies this property and the wave packet oscillates sinusoidally in the oscillator potential without changing shape as shown in Fig. 2.1. This coherent wave packet always has minimum uncertainty, and resembles the classical field as nearly as quantum mechanics permits. The corresponding state vector is the coherent state |α〉, which is the eigenstate of the positive frequency part of the electric field operator, or, equivalently, the eigenstate of the destruction operator of the field. Classically an electromagnetic field consists of waves with welldefined amplitude and phase. Such is not the case when we treat the field quantum mechanically.

Cambridge University Press eBooksSep 4, 19973 citations

Defining coherent states: why must they be eigenstates of the annihilation operator?

Juan Pablo Paz, Augusto J. Roncaglia

This is a pedagogical paper where we present a physically motivated approach to introduce the coherent states of a harmonic oscillator from which it is simple to rigorously derive their mathematical definition. We do this in two different ways that turn out to be equivalent but emphasize two related but different aspects of classicality. First, we analyze which are the quantum states that are the closest one can get to a point in phase space and demonstrate the validity of the following theorem: (i) The product of the uncertainty in position and that of momentum saturates the bound imposed by Heisenberg uncertainty relations for all times if and only if the state is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator. Second, we analyze the way in which the difference between the expectation value of the energy and the energy associated with the expectation values of position and momentum depends on the state, and show the validity of the following theorem (ii) the difference between the expectation value of the energy and the energy associated with the expectation values is minimal if and only if the state is an eigenstate of the annihilation operator. We also show that the reason why coherent states are chosen as the most classical ones by the decoherence process induced by coupling the particle to an environment in the standard Quantum Brownian motion model, is precisely due to the validity of the two above theorems.

arXiv:2410.16483Oct 21, 20240 citations

Coherent states

J. C. Garrison, R. Y. Chiao

The elementary quantum theory of quasi-classical states for mechanical harmonic oscillators is applied to the radiation oscillators describing light, and thus used to define quasi-classical states of light. These states are called “coherent”, because the expectation value of any normally ordered product of creation and annihilation operators factorizes for them. A theoretical discussion of possible sources for coherent states is followed by experimental evidence for their existence. The mathematical properties of coherent states, e.g., nonorthogonality and overcompleteness, are explained in order to use them to represent states and operators. These representations provide a suitable replacement for the classical phase space description of light, which is forbidden by the uncertainty principle. The quantum phase space approach leads to the definition of the Wigner distribution, the Q-function, the P-function, and Gaussian mixed states.

Oxford University Press eBooksJun 5, 20080 citations

Coherent states

Yuli V. Nazarov, Jeroen Danon

This chapter is devoted to coherent states. Generally speaking, a wave function of a system of identical particles does not have to have a certain number of particles. It can be a superposition of states with different numbers of particles. We have already encountered this in Chapters 5 and 6 when we studied superconductivity and superfluidity. Another important example of states with no well-defined number of particles is given by coherent states . In a way, these states are those which most resemble classical ones: the uncertainty in conjugated variables (such as position and momentum) is minimal for both variables, and their time-evolution is as close to classical trajectories as one can get. Coherent states of radiation are relatively easy to achieve. They arise if we excite the electromagnetic field with classical currents. We look in detail at the coherent state of a single-mode oscillator and all its properties. The coherent state turns out to be an eigenfunction of the annihilation operator, the distribution of photon numbers is Poissonian, and it provides an optimal wave function describing a classical electromagnetic wave. We come back to our simple model of the laser and critically revise it with our knowledge of coherent states, and estimate the time at which the laser retains its optical coherence. We then derive Maxwell–Bloch equations that combine the master equation approach to the lasing (as outlined in Chapter 9) with the concept of coherence.

Cambridge University Press eBooksJan 3, 20130 citations

Ex t

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

It is easy to show that the expectation value of the amplitude of the EM ﬁeld in the photon number state |n〉 is equal to zero. Since 〈n| Eˆ x |n〉 = E 〈n|aˆ + aˆ†|n〉 sin(kz), (4.5) and aˆ |n〉 = √n |n− 1〉 , aˆ† |n〉 = √n+ 1 |n+ 1〉 , (4.6) with 〈n|m〉 = δnm, we obtain 〈n| Eˆ x |n〉 = 0. (4.7) Note that 〈n|Eˆ x |n〉 = 0 independent of n, that is, 〈n|Eˆ x |n〉 = 0 even if n → ∞. This is unusual property of the quantum ﬁeld as in the limit of n → ∞ the properties of the photon-number state should convert into that corresponding to a classical state. However, we know that the classical ﬁeld performs harmonic oscillations in time.

Apr 19, 20160 citations

Representations of the EM Field

Z. Ficek, Mohamed Ridza Wahiddin

In this chapter, we will introduce diﬀerent representations of the electromagnetic (EM) ﬁeld. One may ask, why do we need diﬀerent representations for the EMﬁeld? The answer is that usually we do not know the state of the EM ﬁeld which in quantum optics is represented by the annihilation and creation operators. However, results of measurements of the ﬁeld are given in terms of real variables, for example, intensity. The representations allow us to recognize the state of the ﬁeld from values of the measured quantities such as average amplitude, intensity, and correlation functions. The nature of the state is present in terms of the interpretation of the apparently classical (measured) variables. We will discuss two basic types of representations often used in quantum optics, Fock state (photon number) representation and coherent states representation, the later one introduced by Glauber.a We also discuss properties of ﬁelds with thermal and Poisson distribution of photons. The photon number states are very often used as a basis for quantum optics problems, and despite of many diﬃculties have recently been generated experimentally [11-13].

Apr 19, 20160 citations