Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Description of Experiment Testing Superluminal Communication

Omer Dickstein

Published Sep 1, 2014• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Appendix A, appendix to the paper Non spin based quantum information transmission methods

Related papers

Superluminal Communication in Quantum Mechanics

Daniel J. Gauthier

Compendium of Quantum Physics•Jan 1, 2009•2 citations

Non Spin Based Quantum Information Transmission Methods

Omer Dickstein

Most physicists claim no superluminal communication between two seperate points in space is possible in any manner. This claim is based on the no communication theory and on special relativity stating all communication methods are subluminal. This paper discusses theoretical 'holes' in no communication theorem and proposes an experiment that may check the validity of the no-communication theorem under special conditions.

•Sep 1, 2014•0 citations

The Primary Exploration of Application of Quantum Entanglement Weak Measurement in Superluminal Communication

寇召飞 Kou Zhaofei, Xinrong Mao

The entanglement properties of the quantum channel in quantum communication did not play well, in order to realize quantum communication at superluminal speed with the help of this entanglement property, a kind of quantum communication mode which can measure the change of quantum information is proposed in this article. This method can bypass the classical channel part in the quantum communication. In the concrete realization process, by combining the quantum weak measurement method, information transmission can be carried out without destroying entangled states, so as to achieve superluminal communication.

Computing Performance and Communication systems•May 28, 2019•0 citations

Impossibility of superluminal communication: a simple quantum mechanical exercise

Miloslav Dušek

Czechoslovak Journal of Physics•Feb 1, 1997•0 citations

A Systematic Procedure to Implement the Quantum Protocols for Superluminal Classical Communication and Superluminal Teleportation

Quantum Physics Letters•Aug 1, 2023•0 citations

Nonlocal Quantum Information Transfer Without Superluminal Signalling and Communication

Jan Walleczek, Gerhard Grössing

It is a frequent assumption that—via superluminal information transfers—superluminal signals capable of enabling communication are necessarily exchanged in any quantum theory that posits hidden superluminal influences. However, does the presence of hidden superluminal influences automatically imply superluminal signalling and communication? The non-signalling theorem mediates the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity. However, as a ‘no-go’ theorem there exist two opposing interpretations of the non-signalling constraint: foundational and operational. Concerning Bell’s theorem, we argue that Bell employed both interpretations, and that he finally adopted the operational position which is associated often with ontological quantum theory, e.g., de Broglie–Bohm theory. This position we refer to as “effective non-signalling”. By contrast, associated with orthodox quantum mechanics is the foundational position referred to here as “axiomatic non-signalling”. In search of a decisive communication-theoretic criterion for differentiating between “axiomatic” and “effective” non-signalling, we employ the operational framework offered by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, whereby we distinguish between Shannon signals and non-Shannon signals. We find that an effective non-signalling theorem represents two sub-theorems: (1) Non-transfer-control (NTC) theorem, and (2) Non-signification-control (NSC) theorem. Employing NTC and NSC theorems, we report that effective, instead of axiomatic, non-signalling is entirely sufficient for prohibiting nonlocal communication. Effective non-signalling prevents the instantaneous, i.e., superluminal, transfer of message-encoded information through the controlled use—by a sender-receiver pair —of informationally-correlated detection events, e.g., in EPR-type experiments. An effective non-signalling theorem allows for nonlocal quantum information transfer yet—at the same time—effectively denies superluminal signalling and communication.

arXiv:1501.07177•Foundations of Physics•Jan 29, 2016•17 citations
The entanglement properties of the quantum channel in quantum communication did not play well, in order to realize quantum communication at superluminal speed with the help of this entanglement property, a kind of quantum communication mode which can measure the change of quantum information is proposed in this article. This method can bypass the classical channel part in the quantum communication. In the concrete realization process, by combining the quantum weak measurement method, information transmission can be carried out without destroying entangled states, so as to achieve superluminal communication.
It is a frequent assumption that—via superluminal information transfers—superluminal signals capable of enabling communication are necessarily exchanged in any quantum theory that posits hidden superluminal influences. However, does the presence of hidden superluminal influences automatically imply superluminal signalling and communication? The non-signalling theorem mediates the apparent conflict between quantum mechanics and the theory of special relativity. However, as a ‘no-go’ theorem there exist two opposing interpretations of the non-signalling constraint: foundational and operational. Concerning Bell’s theorem, we argue that Bell employed both interpretations, and that he finally adopted the operational position which is associated often with ontological quantum theory, e.g., de Broglie–Bohm theory. This position we refer to as “effective non-signalling”. By contrast, associated with orthodox quantum mechanics is the foundational position referred to here as “axiomatic non-signalling”. In search of a decisive communication-theoretic criterion for differentiating between “axiomatic” and “effective” non-signalling, we employ the operational framework offered by Shannon’s mathematical theory of communication, whereby we distinguish between Shannon signals and non-Shannon signals. We find that an effective non-signalling theorem represents two sub-theorems: (1) Non-transfer-control (NTC) theorem, and (2) Non-signification-control (NSC) theorem. Employing NTC and NSC theorems, we report that effective, instead of axiomatic, non-signalling is entirely sufficient for prohibiting nonlocal communication. Effective non-signalling prevents the instantaneous, i.e., superluminal, transfer of message-encoded information through the controlled use—by a sender-receiver pair —of informationally-correlated detection events, e.g., in EPR-type experiments. An effective non-signalling theorem allows for nonlocal quantum information transfer yet—at the same time—effectively denies superluminal signalling and communication.