Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Propagation of temporal entanglement (8 pages)

Mankei Tsang, Demetri Psaltis

Published Jan 1, 2006• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Related papers

Propagation of spatially entangled qudits through free space (5 pages)

G. Lima, Ivan F. Santos, Leonardo Neves +1 more

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Entanglement dynamics in chaotic systems (5 pages)

Barry C. Sanders, Shohini Ghose

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

AN INTRODUCTION TO ENTANGLEMENT THEORY

Damian Markham

•Apr 1, 2008•0 citations

The preferred-time problem in the conditional interpretation of time

Ovidiu Cristinel Stoica

In timeless formulations of quantum theory, the Page-Wootters proposal (PW) recovers time and dynamics as relative clock-and-world states. By interpreting the total timeless system as a clock entangled with the world, the states having a definite clock reading appear to recover the temporal states of the world as relative states, and dynamics emerges. But an entangled state admits infinitely many decompositions as a superposition of product states, each decomposition corresponding to a different but equally valid time operator of the same clock system. Different valid choices of the time operator for the same clock system lead to different physical histories, where the world states in a history are superpositions of the world states from another history. Fixing one operator as "the" clock time would import the temporal meaning that the Page-Wootters proposal is meant to explain in the first place. Therefore, the interpretation of PW that the world state is passively conditioned on the clock state cannot hold. The timeless state is resolved into time-dependent states by the intrinsic pointer observables of the world, without having to outsource the role of the time operator to a separate clock. Fortunately, the formalism of PW remains valid, provided that it is interpreted in terms of intrinsic pointer observables of the world itself.

quant-pharXiv:2608.16732•Aug 18, 2026•0 citations

Trinity of relational quantum dynamics

Philipp A. Höhn, Alexander R. H. Smith, Maximilian P. E. Lock

The problem of time in quantum gravity calls for a relational solution. Using quantum reduction maps, we establish a previously unknown equivalence between three approaches to relational quantum dynamics: (1) relational observables in the clock-neutral picture of Dirac quantization, (2) Page and Wootters' (PW) Schr\"odinger picture formalism, and (3) the relational Heisenberg picture obtained via symmetry reduction. Constituting three faces of the same dynamics, we call this equivalence the trinity. In the process, we develop a quantization procedure for relational Dirac observables using covariant positive operator-valued measures which encompass nonideal clocks and resolve the nonmonotonicity issue of realistic quantum clocks reported by Unruh and Wald. The quantum reduction maps reveal this procedure as the quantum analog of gauge-invariantly extending gauge-fixed quantities. We establish algebraic properties of these relational observables. We extend a recent ``clock-neutral'' approach to changing temporal reference frames, transforming relational observables and states, and demonstrate a clock dependent temporal nonlocality effect. We show that Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism, alleging that the conditional probabilities of the PW formalism violate the constraint, is incorrect. They are a quantum analog of a gauge-fixed description of a gauge-invariant quantity and equivalent to the manifestly gauge-invariant evaluation of relational observables in the physical inner product. The trinity furthermore resolves a previously reported normalization ambiguity and clarifies the role of entanglement in the PW formalism. The trinity finally permits us to resolve Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism that the PW formalism yields wrong propagators by showing how conditional probabilities of relational observables give the correct transition probabilities. Unlike previous proposals, our resolution does not invoke approximations, ideal clocks or ancilla systems, is manifestly gauge invariant, and easily extends to an arbitrary number of conditionings.

arXiv:1912.00033•Physical review. D/Physical review. D.•Sep 1, 2021•178 citations

An Introduction to Entanglement Theory

Martin Bodo Plenio, S. Virmani

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2014•129 citations
In timeless formulations of quantum theory, the Page-Wootters proposal (PW) recovers time and dynamics as relative clock-and-world states. By interpreting the total timeless system as a clock entangled with the world, the states having a definite clock reading appear to recover the temporal states of the world as relative states, and dynamics emerges. But an entangled state admits infinitely many decompositions as a superposition of product states, each decomposition corresponding to a different but equally valid time operator of the same clock system. Different valid choices of the time operator for the same clock system lead to different physical histories, where the world states in a history are superpositions of the world states from another history. Fixing one operator as "the" clock time would import the temporal meaning that the Page-Wootters proposal is meant to explain in the first place. Therefore, the interpretation of PW that the world state is passively conditioned on the clock state cannot hold. The timeless state is resolved into time-dependent states by the intrinsic pointer observables of the world, without having to outsource the role of the time operator to a separate clock. Fortunately, the formalism of PW remains valid, provided that it is interpreted in terms of intrinsic pointer observables of the world itself.
The problem of time in quantum gravity calls for a relational solution. Using quantum reduction maps, we establish a previously unknown equivalence between three approaches to relational quantum dynamics: (1) relational observables in the clock-neutral picture of Dirac quantization, (2) Page and Wootters' (PW) Schr\"odinger picture formalism, and (3) the relational Heisenberg picture obtained via symmetry reduction. Constituting three faces of the same dynamics, we call this equivalence the trinity. In the process, we develop a quantization procedure for relational Dirac observables using covariant positive operator-valued measures which encompass nonideal clocks and resolve the nonmonotonicity issue of realistic quantum clocks reported by Unruh and Wald. The quantum reduction maps reveal this procedure as the quantum analog of gauge-invariantly extending gauge-fixed quantities. We establish algebraic properties of these relational observables. We extend a recent ``clock-neutral'' approach to changing temporal reference frames, transforming relational observables and states, and demonstrate a clock dependent temporal nonlocality effect. We show that Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism, alleging that the conditional probabilities of the PW formalism violate the constraint, is incorrect. They are a quantum analog of a gauge-fixed description of a gauge-invariant quantity and equivalent to the manifestly gauge-invariant evaluation of relational observables in the physical inner product. The trinity furthermore resolves a previously reported normalization ambiguity and clarifies the role of entanglement in the PW formalism. The trinity finally permits us to resolve Kucha\ifmmode \check{r}\else \v{r}\fi{}'s criticism that the PW formalism yields wrong propagators by showing how conditional probabilities of relational observables give the correct transition probabilities. Unlike previous proposals, our resolution does not invoke approximations, ideal clocks or ancilla systems, is manifestly gauge invariant, and easily extends to an arbitrary number of conditionings.