Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks

DOES COMBINING NONDETERMINISM AND PROBABILITY MAKE SENSE?

Prakash Panangaden

Published Apr 1, 2004• 4 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1142/9789812562494_0056

Related papers

8 NONDETERMINISM: MAGIC OR REALITY?

John MacCormick

Princeton University Press eBooks•Dec 31, 2018•0 citations

NONDETERMINISM:

Princeton University Press eBooks•May 15, 2018•0 citations

DO WE NEED "QUANTUM" PROBABILITY?

Romano Scozzafava

Conference on the Foundations of Quantum Mechanics: Historical Analysis and Open Questions•May 1, 2000•0 citations

PROBABILITY ENTERS PHYSICS

Kurt Alfred Georg Mendelssohn

Elsevier eBooks•Jan 1, 2013•1 citation

NECESSITY OF COMBINING MUTUALLY INCOMPATIBLE PERSPECTIVES IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF A GLOBAL VIEW: QUANTUM PROBABILITY AND SIGNAL ANALYSIS

Sven Aerts, Diederik Aerts, Franklin E. Schroeck

The scientific fields of quantum mechanics and signal-analysis originated within different settings, aimed at different goals and started from different scientific paradigms. Yet the development of the two subjects has become increasingly intertwined. We argue that these similarities are rooted in the fact that both fields of scientific inquiry had to deal with finding a single description for a phenomenon that yields complete information about itself only when we consider mutually incompatible accounts of that phenomenon.

arXiv:quant-ph/0503112•Jul 1, 2005•0 citations

Determinism and Probability

Series on the foundations of natural science and technology•Nov 1, 2025•0 citations
The scientific fields of quantum mechanics and signal-analysis originated within different settings, aimed at different goals and started from different scientific paradigms. Yet the development of the two subjects has become increasingly intertwined. We argue that these similarities are rooted in the fact that both fields of scientific inquiry had to deal with finding a single description for a phenomenon that yields complete information about itself only when we consider mutually incompatible accounts of that phenomenon.