Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Surreal Trajectories and Intrinsic Position

V.C.M. Schoutsen

Published Jul 23, 2012• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

June 2010 - The problem of surreal trajectories in the Bohm theory leaves us with some questions surrounding the status of position. Is position an intrinsic property of Bohmian particles?

Related papers

The Persistance of Memory: Surreal Trajectories in

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm’s theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm’s theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm’s theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm’s theory and the relativity. 1 1This paper is an extension of the discussion of surreal trajectories in Barrett (1999, 127–40). That section of the book was based on talk I gave at the Quantum Mechanics Workshop at the University of Pittsburgh in the Spring of 1997. And that talk owed much

•Jan 1, 2000•0 citations

The Persistence of Memory: Surreal Trajectories in Bohm's Theory

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm's theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm's theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm's theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm's theory and relativity. They also provide a striking example of the theory-ladenness of observation.

arXiv:quant-ph/0002046•Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 2000•60 citations

Real surreal trajectories in pilot-wave hydrodynamics

Valeri Frumkin, David Darrow, John W. M. Bush +1 more

In certain instances, the particle paths predicted by Bohmian mechanics are considered to be at odds with classical intuition, and so deemed to be ``surreal.'' Through a combined experimental and numerical study, the authors demonstrate that individual trajectories in the hydrodynamic pilot-wave system exhibit the key features of their surreal Bohmian counterparts.

arXiv:2205.10628•Physical Review A•Jul 25, 2022•19 citations

Experimental nonlocal and surreal Bohmian trajectories

Dylan H. Mahler, Lee A. Rozema, Kent Bonsma-Fisher +4 more

Researchers reconstruct trajectories of two entangled photons showing the nonlocal and “surreal” nature of the trajectories in Bohmian mechanics.

Science Advances•Feb 19, 2016•24 citations

Measuring Bohm Trajectories of Entangled Photons

Dylan H. Mahler, Lee A. Rozema, Kent Bonsma-Fisher +5 more

We measure, using weak measurement, the Bohmian trajectories of one photon that is part of an entangled pair. Our results shed light on the nonlocality of the Bohm model, as well as its so-called “surrealism.”

•Jan 1, 2014•3 citations

Quantum Trajectories: Real or Surreal?

Basil J. Hiley, Peter Van Reeth

The claim of Kocsis et al. to have experimentally determined "photon trajectories" calls for a re-examination of the meaning of "quantum trajectories". We will review the arguments that have been assumed to have established that a trajectory has no meaning in the context of quantum mechanics. We show that the conclusion that the Bohm trajectories should be called "surreal" because they are at "variance with the actual observed track" of a particle is wrong as it is based on a false argument. We also present the results of a numerical investigation of a double Stern-Gerlach experiment which shows clearly the role of the spin within the Bohm formalism and discuss situations where the appearance of the quantum potential is open to direct experimental exploration.

Entropy•May 8, 2018•18 citations
In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm’s theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm’s theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm’s theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm’s theory and the relativity. 1 1This paper is an extension of the discussion of surreal trajectories in Barrett (1999, 127–40). That section of the book was based on talk I gave at the Quantum Mechanics Workshop at the University of Pittsburgh in the Spring of 1997. And that talk owed much
In this paper I describe the history of the surreal trajectories problem and argue that in fact it is not a problem for Bohm's theory. More specifically, I argue that one can take the particle trajectories predicted by Bohm's theory to be the actual trajectories that particles follow and that there is no reason to suppose that good particle detectors are somehow fooled in the context of the surreal trajectories experiments. Rather than showing that Bohm's theory predicts the wrong particle trajectories or that it somehow prevents one from making reliable measurements, such experiments ultimately reveal the special role played by position and the fundamental incompatibility between Bohm's theory and relativity. They also provide a striking example of the theory-ladenness of observation.
The claim of Kocsis et al. to have experimentally determined "photon trajectories" calls for a re-examination of the meaning of "quantum trajectories". We will review the arguments that have been assumed to have established that a trajectory has no meaning in the context of quantum mechanics. We show that the conclusion that the Bohm trajectories should be called "surreal" because they are at "variance with the actual observed track" of a particle is wrong as it is based on a false argument. We also present the results of a numerical investigation of a double Stern-Gerlach experiment which shows clearly the role of the spin within the Bohm formalism and discuss situations where the appearance of the quantum potential is open to direct experimental exploration.