Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer theses

Uncertainty Relations Between Error and Disturbance in Quantum Measurements

Yu Watanabe

Published Dec 17, 2013• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/978-4-431-54493-7_9

Related papers

Formulation of uncertainty relations between error and disturbance in quantum measurement by using quantum estimation theory

優 渡辺

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Formulation of Uncertainty Relation Between Error and Disturbance in Quantum Measurement by Using Quantum Estimation Theory

Yu Watanabe

Springer theses•Dec 17, 2013•14 citations

Experimental Test of Error, Disturbance, and Uncertainty Relations in Quantum Measurement(Research)

Keiichi Edamatsu, Fumihiro Kaneda, So-Young Baek +1 more

日本物理學會誌•Mar 5, 2015•0 citations

Uncertainty relations for noise and disturbance in generalized quantum measurements

Masanao Ozawa

arXiv:quant-ph/0307057•Annals of Physics•Feb 28, 2004•256 citations

Error-disturbance uncertainty relations in neutron spin measurements

Stephan Sponar

Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.

International Journal of Quantum Information•May 21, 2016•0 citations

Error and Disturbance in Quantum Measurements

Yu Watanabe

Springer theses•Dec 17, 2013•0 citations
Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle in a formulation of uncertainties, intrinsic to any quantum system, is rigorously proven and demonstrated in various quantum systems. Nevertheless, Heisenberg’s original formulation of the uncertainty principle was given in terms of a reciprocal relation between the error of a position measurement and the thereby induced disturbance on a subsequent momentum measurement. However, a naive generalization of a Heisenberg-type error-disturbance relation for arbitrary observables is not valid. An alternative universally valid relation was derived by Ozawa in 2003. Though universally valid, Ozawa’s relation is not optimal. Recently, Branciard has derived a tight error-disturbance uncertainty relation (EDUR), describing the optimal trade-off between error and disturbance under certain conditions. Here, we report a neutron-optical experiment that records the error of a spin-component measurement, as well as the disturbance caused on another spin-component to test EDURs. We demonstrate that Heisenberg’s original EDUR is violated, and Ozawa’s and Branciard’s EDURs are valid in a wide range of experimental parameters, as well as the tightness of Branciard’s relation.