Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Springer eBooks

Simulation of optimum quantum receiver

Kouichi Yamazaki

Published Apr 7, 2008• 0 citations
Publisher
DOI
10.1007/3-540-53862-3_198

Related papers

An optimum receiver for the binary coherent state quantum channel

Samuel J. Dolinar

•Jan 1, 1973•129 citations

A near-optimum receiver for the binary coherent state quantum channel

Robert S. Kennedy

Quarterly Progress Report•Jan 1, 1973•82 citations

On the near-optimum binary coherent-state receiver

Joel H. Shapiro

•Jul 1, 1980•3 citations

Quantum simulation

Andreas H. Trabesinger

Nature Physics•Apr 1, 2012•127 citations

Sampling timing offset and bandwidth optimization in coherent optical QPSK eavesdropping receivers

Zhaohui Ma, Jian Chen, Tianping Feng

We studied the influence of limited bandwidth of receiver on tapping signals. The optimum sampling timing offset (STO) and filter bandwidth in 80 Gbit/s coherent optical QPSK eavesdropping system are also discussed. Different order of Bessel filters are taken into account in the presence of laser phase noise. Optimal receiver performance relies on a trade-off between additive noise and inter-symbol interference (ISI). Optimum STO and bandwidth of eavesdropping receiver are determined by signal to noise ratio (SNR) per bit as we define. Simulation results show that the ratio of optimum STO to symbol duration are 0 and 0.25 for the 1stand 5th-order Bessel frequency response of receivers, respectively.

International Conference on Optical Communications and Networks (ICOCN)•Jul 1, 2015•0 citations

Quantum Computer Simulation

Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks•Jan 14, 2006•1 citation
We studied the influence of limited bandwidth of receiver on tapping signals. The optimum sampling timing offset (STO) and filter bandwidth in 80 Gbit/s coherent optical QPSK eavesdropping system are also discussed. Different order of Bessel filters are taken into account in the presence of laser phase noise. Optimal receiver performance relies on a trade-off between additive noise and inter-symbol interference (ISI). Optimum STO and bandwidth of eavesdropping receiver are determined by signal to noise ratio (SNR) per bit as we define. Simulation results show that the ratio of optimum STO to symbol duration are 0 and 0.25 for the 1stand 5th-order Bessel frequency response of receivers, respectively.