Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Relations between entanglement witnesses and Bell inequalities (7 pages)

Dagmar Bruß, Maciej Lewenstein, P. Hyllus, Otfried Gühne

Published Jan 1, 2005• 2 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Bell-state diagonal-entanglement witnesses (16 pages)

M. A. Jafarizadeh

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Detection of N-particle entanglement with generalized Bell inequalities (4 pages)

Marek Żukowski, Wiesław Laskowski

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•1 citation

Bell Inequalities With and Without Entanglement

Ingemar Bengtsson

•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

Bell-type inequality in quantum coherence theory as an entanglement witness

Kaifeng Bu, Asutosh Kumar, Junde Wu

Bell inequality is a mathematical inequality derived using the assumptions of locality and realism. Its violation guarantees the existence of quantum correlations in a quantum state. Bell inequality acts as an entanglement witness in the sense that a pure bipartite quantum state, having nonvanishing entanglement, always violates a Bell inequality. We construct Bell-type inequalities for product states in quantum coherence theory for different measures of coherence, and find that the maximally entangled states violate these inequalities. We further show that Bell-type inequalities for relative entropy of coherence is violated by all two-qubit pure entangled states, serving as an entanglement witness.

arXiv:1603.06322•Mar 21, 2016•9 citations

Relations between entanglement witnesses and Bell inequalities

Philipp Hyllus, Otfried Gühne, Dagmar Bruß +1 more

Bell inequalities, considered within quantum mechanics, can be regarded as nonoptimal witness operators. We discuss the relationship between such Bell witnesses and general entanglement witnesses in detail for the Bell inequality derived by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)]. We derive bounds on how much an optimal witness has to be shifted by adding the identity operator to make it positive on all states admitting a local hidden variable model. In the opposite direction, we obtain tight bounds for the maximal proportion of the identity operator that can be subtracted from such a CHSH witness, while preserving the witness properties. Finally, we investigate the structure of CHSH witnesses directly by relating their diagonalized form to optimal witnesses of two different classes.

arXiv:quant-ph/0504079•Physical Review A•Jul 20, 2005•112 citations

Entanglement and Bell Inequalities

WORLD SCIENTIFIC eBooks•Aug 27, 2026•0 citations
Bell inequality is a mathematical inequality derived using the assumptions of locality and realism. Its violation guarantees the existence of quantum correlations in a quantum state. Bell inequality acts as an entanglement witness in the sense that a pure bipartite quantum state, having nonvanishing entanglement, always violates a Bell inequality. We construct Bell-type inequalities for product states in quantum coherence theory for different measures of coherence, and find that the maximally entangled states violate these inequalities. We further show that Bell-type inequalities for relative entropy of coherence is violated by all two-qubit pure entangled states, serving as an entanglement witness.
Bell inequalities, considered within quantum mechanics, can be regarded as nonoptimal witness operators. We discuss the relationship between such Bell witnesses and general entanglement witnesses in detail for the Bell inequality derived by Clauser, Horne, Shimony, and Holt (CHSH) [Phys. Rev. Lett. 23, 880 (1969)]. We derive bounds on how much an optimal witness has to be shifted by adding the identity operator to make it positive on all states admitting a local hidden variable model. In the opposite direction, we obtain tight bounds for the maximal proportion of the identity operator that can be subtracted from such a CHSH witness, while preserving the witness properties. Finally, we investigate the structure of CHSH witnesses directly by relating their diagonalized form to optimal witnesses of two different classes.