Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Philosophical and Methodological Problems of the Principle of Least Action.

Vladislav Terekhovich

Published Jan 1, 2013• 1 citation
OpenAlex

Abstract

Twenty extremal principles of the natural sciences are reformulated to the general ontological scheme. The hypothesis is substantiated that the unique role of the principle of least action is based on its probabilistic interpretation. It is shown how most of the variational principles can be reduced to the principle of maximal probability, which is based on a realistic interpretation of Feynman’s path integral method.

Related papers

Действующие и целевые причины в принципе наименьшего действия

Vladislav Terekhovich

The problem dealt with is that of deterministic and teleological interpretation of least action principle. The author argues that ‘path integral method’ of quantum mechanics could be used as an ontological hypothesis concerning the essence of classical object motion. This makes it possible to replace actual and final causality by probabilistic one.

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

La importancia Física de la “mínima acción”.

Rafael Andrés Alemañ Berenguer

Variational calculus applied to physical action, sometimes known –inexactly– as “principle of the least action”, has helped us quite a lot to construct our scientific picture of the natural world. From Leibniz and Maupertuis to Planck and Einstein, this method has repetedly shown its effectiveness, but only with Feynman path-integrals do we begin to understand the underlying explanation.

Revista española de física•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Ontological Foundations of the Variational Principles and the Path Integral Formalism

Vladislav Terekhovich

In this paper, I consider the issue of how two mathematical models of modern physics, the variational principles and the quantum path integral formalism, relate to reality. I assume that the observed phenomena are consistent with the calculations because both of these models have some common ontological foundations. According to the hypothesis of the summation of coexisting alternative possibilities, at the quantum level, the system at once moves along all histories that possible in given boundary conditions. The actual history is a mere result of the summation of all these alternative possible histories. This resultant history differs from others with the minimal action and maximal probability. I observe this history as a macroscopic trajectory of the system.

arXiv:1909.10064•Sep 22, 2019•0 citations

EL PRINCIPIO DE ACCION MINIMA EN EL CENTENARIO DEL QUANTUM

Hugo Pérez Rojas, Fidel Castro Díaz-Balart

A brief historical review of the Principle of Least Action is given, and it's methodological importance is emphasized: the basic equations of Classical Mechanics can be derived from the conjunction of the Principle Least Action with the Galilean Principle of Relativity and the hypothesis of homogeneity and isotropy of space and the homogeneity of time. In classical electrodinamics, the situation is similar: one can build the action keeping now in mind the Einstein's Principle of Relativity. By means of the solution of the Euler-Lagrange equations one obtain the equations of motion of charges in given fields (Lorentz force) and the first pair of Maxwell equations. Also, starting from the sources of the field (charges and currents), the second pair of Maxwell equations is obtained.\nIn the case of the General Relativity, the trajectories of a free particle are given by the geodesic lines in space-time. The Einstein equations are also obtained by finding the extreme of some action. A brief historical review of quantum theory is given, starting from the introduction of the quantum of action in physics, to the Schrödinger equation, which can be obtained from a variational principle, and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Interesting is the role of the classical action in the formulation of quantum mechanics by means of the Feynman path integrals. In it, the classical trajectory in the motion of a system between two configurations, it corresponds the limit in which the Planck constant tends to zero. In quantum electrodinamics, it is required also to start from a Lagrangian together with the properties of space-time simmetry, the gauge invariance and the CPT invariance. Finally, mention is made to the electroweak theory and to quantum cromodynamics

Llull: Revista de la Sociedad Española de Historia de las Ciencias y de las Técnicas•Jan 1, 2000•1 citation

Probabilistic and Geometric Languages in the Context of the Principle of Least Action

Vladislav Terekhovich

This paper explores the issue of the unification of three languages of physics, the geometric language of forces, geometric language of fields or 4-dimensional space-time, and probabilistic language of quantum mechanics. On the one hand, equations in each language may be derived from the Principle of Least Action (PLA). On the other hand, Feynman's path integral method could explain the physical meaning of PLA. The axioms of classical and relativistic mechanics can be considered as consequences of Feynman's formulation of quantum mechanics.

arXiv:1210.1176•Oct 3, 2012•0 citations

The Multi-fold Least Action Principle, a Quasi Theory Of Everything

Stephane Herman Maes

The principle of least action is known to apply to many domains of Physics. Yet its justifications and derivations usually come from archaic classical principles like the Fermat or Maupertuis principles, or mathematical analytical frameworks used for classical mechanics like the Lagrange, Hamilton and D’Alembert formalisms. As is well known, it is widely applicable to other domains, without necessarily a clear justification for it, especially when applied to Physics where Lagrangians or Hamiltonians may not be defined or do not exist. In addition, the Feynman Path Integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics gave it a second life, and another way to justify its validity not only in classical, but also in quantum Physics. However, the conventional logic to reach these conclusions is at time circular, and the principle is applied without proof that it is applicable: it just works and everybody does it. It is this applicability that led us in the past to treat the Action path integral as God’s equation.The paper justifies the principle of least action and Feynman’s path integrals through different physical reasoning instead of the traditional mathematical formalism, and on that basis we confirm its validity in most situations, even if Hamiltonians or Lagrangians may be shaky to define, or the system may be dissipative. We also explain when, and why, sometimes, it may not conventionally apply. The derivation uncovers different links between Entropy and Action, which also opens a different way to look at the origin of the probability distribution of even just a single lone particle; especially when complemented with the W-type multi-fold hypothesis, and makes some considerations on Feynman diagrams, instantons, renormalons and resurgence. Also discontinuities in the paths of the path integrals imply that spacetime is discrete, and non-commutative, and supersymmetry in flat spacetime is unphysical. Surfaceology, as optimized computation of the Feynman diagram is shown to trivially predict that all gauge theories double copy dual to gravity share the same forbidden scatterings. Relying on a recently encountered paper, we show how the results of the multi-fold theory, in particular the multi-fold space time matter induction and scattering, built explicitly on the path integral formalism, its underlying principles, and the principle of least action, allows recovering almost everything in Today’s physics. It leaves out essentially only some of the coupling constants and mixing angles/parameters. This goes a long way towards the ambition of a Theory Of Everything (TOE), even if not presented as usually expected. It maybe the best that can be achieved considering Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Our justification of the principle of least action, and path integrals, and our work on multi-fold theory encounters relationships between Entropy and Action. We review these encounters, including how our early prediction that entanglement might be irreversible match recent published results that argue against the existence of a (second) Law of entanglement analogous to the second Law of Thermodynamics. Also, from our approach, we obtain a formulation of the evolution of entropy, including for irreversible systems, which matches Onsager and Prigogine’s famous models and principles.

•Dec 26, 2024•28 citations
Twenty extremal principles of the natural sciences are reformulated to the general ontological scheme. The hypothesis is substantiated that the unique role of the principle of least action is based on its probabilistic interpretation. It is shown how most of the variational principles can be reduced to the principle of maximal probability, which is based on a realistic interpretation of Feynman’s path integral method.
In this paper, I consider the issue of how two mathematical models of modern physics, the variational principles and the quantum path integral formalism, relate to reality. I assume that the observed phenomena are consistent with the calculations because both of these models have some common ontological foundations. According to the hypothesis of the summation of coexisting alternative possibilities, at the quantum level, the system at once moves along all histories that possible in given boundary conditions. The actual history is a mere result of the summation of all these alternative possible histories. This resultant history differs from others with the minimal action and maximal probability. I observe this history as a macroscopic trajectory of the system.
A brief historical review of the Principle of Least Action is given, and it's methodological importance is emphasized: the basic equations of Classical Mechanics can be derived from the conjunction of the Principle Least Action with the Galilean Principle of Relativity and the hypothesis of homogeneity and isotropy of space and the homogeneity of time. In classical electrodinamics, the situation is similar: one can build the action keeping now in mind the Einstein's Principle of Relativity. By means of the solution of the Euler-Lagrange equations one obtain the equations of motion of charges in given fields (Lorentz force) and the first pair of Maxwell equations. Also, starting from the sources of the field (charges and currents), the second pair of Maxwell equations is obtained.\nIn the case of the General Relativity, the trajectories of a free particle are given by the geodesic lines in space-time. The Einstein equations are also obtained by finding the extreme of some action. A brief historical review of quantum theory is given, starting from the introduction of the quantum of action in physics, to the Schrödinger equation, which can be obtained from a variational principle, and the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle. Interesting is the role of the classical action in the formulation of quantum mechanics by means of the Feynman path integrals. In it, the classical trajectory in the motion of a system between two configurations, it corresponds the limit in which the Planck constant tends to zero. In quantum electrodinamics, it is required also to start from a Lagrangian together with the properties of space-time simmetry, the gauge invariance and the CPT invariance. Finally, mention is made to the electroweak theory and to quantum cromodynamics
This paper explores the issue of the unification of three languages of physics, the geometric language of forces, geometric language of fields or 4-dimensional space-time, and probabilistic language of quantum mechanics. On the one hand, equations in each language may be derived from the Principle of Least Action (PLA). On the other hand, Feynman's path integral method could explain the physical meaning of PLA. The axioms of classical and relativistic mechanics can be considered as consequences of Feynman's formulation of quantum mechanics.
The principle of least action is known to apply to many domains of Physics. Yet its justifications and derivations usually come from archaic classical principles like the Fermat or Maupertuis principles, or mathematical analytical frameworks used for classical mechanics like the Lagrange, Hamilton and D’Alembert formalisms. As is well known, it is widely applicable to other domains, without necessarily a clear justification for it, especially when applied to Physics where Lagrangians or Hamiltonians may not be defined or do not exist. In addition, the Feynman Path Integral formulation of Quantum Mechanics gave it a second life, and another way to justify its validity not only in classical, but also in quantum Physics. However, the conventional logic to reach these conclusions is at time circular, and the principle is applied without proof that it is applicable: it just works and everybody does it. It is this applicability that led us in the past to treat the Action path integral as God’s equation.The paper justifies the principle of least action and Feynman’s path integrals through different physical reasoning instead of the traditional mathematical formalism, and on that basis we confirm its validity in most situations, even if Hamiltonians or Lagrangians may be shaky to define, or the system may be dissipative. We also explain when, and why, sometimes, it may not conventionally apply. The derivation uncovers different links between Entropy and Action, which also opens a different way to look at the origin of the probability distribution of even just a single lone particle; especially when complemented with the W-type multi-fold hypothesis, and makes some considerations on Feynman diagrams, instantons, renormalons and resurgence. Also discontinuities in the paths of the path integrals imply that spacetime is discrete, and non-commutative, and supersymmetry in flat spacetime is unphysical. Surfaceology, as optimized computation of the Feynman diagram is shown to trivially predict that all gauge theories double copy dual to gravity share the same forbidden scatterings. Relying on a recently encountered paper, we show how the results of the multi-fold theory, in particular the multi-fold space time matter induction and scattering, built explicitly on the path integral formalism, its underlying principles, and the principle of least action, allows recovering almost everything in Today’s physics. It leaves out essentially only some of the coupling constants and mixing angles/parameters. This goes a long way towards the ambition of a Theory Of Everything (TOE), even if not presented as usually expected. It maybe the best that can be achieved considering Gödel's incompleteness theorems. Our justification of the principle of least action, and path integrals, and our work on multi-fold theory encounters relationships between Entropy and Action. We review these encounters, including how our early prediction that entanglement might be irreversible match recent published results that argue against the existence of a (second) Law of entanglement analogous to the second Law of Thermodynamics. Also, from our approach, we obtain a formulation of the evolution of entropy, including for irreversible systems, which matches Onsager and Prigogine’s famous models and principles.