Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

A Conceptual Framework to Explain the Entanglement Phenomenon

Barry Wolfson

Published Aug 1, 2011• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

Of all the mysteries that have confronted physicists in the past century surely entanglement must rank amongst the most perplexing. Not only does this phenomenon express itself over apparently arbitrarily large distances and barriers between two particles but it also expresses itself across time! I propose a model using higher dimensional space which conceptually can reconcile the apparent problems presented by entanglement - that of communicating faster than the speed of light and even communicating into the future.

Related papers

On Quantum Entanglement

Bertrand Wong

Quantum entanglement, a term coined by Erwin Schrodinger in 1935, is a mechanical phenomenon at the quantum level wherein the quantum states of two (or more) particles have to be described with reference to each other though these particles may be spatially separated. This phenomenon leads to paradox and has puzzled us for a long time. The behaviour of entangled particles is apparently inexplicable, incomprehensible and like magic at work. Locality has been a reliable and fruitful principle which has guided us to the triumphs of twentieth century physics. But the consequences of the local laws in quantum theory could seem “spooky” and nonlocal, with some theorists questioning locality itself. Could two subatomic particles on opposite sides of the universe be really instantaneously connected? Is any theory which predicts such a connection essentially flawed or incomplete? Are the results of experiments which demonstrate such a connection being misinterpreted? These questions challenge our most basic concepts of spatial distance and time. Modern physics is in the process of dismantling the space all around us and the universe will never be the same. Quantum entanglement involves the utilisation of cutting edge technology and will bring great benefits to society. This paper traces the development of quantum entanglement and presents some possible explanations for the strange behaviour of entangled particles. Published in International Journal of Automatic Control System, Vol. 5: Issue 2, 2019.

•Feb 1, 2020•1 citation

Entanglement : the end of a long mystery ?

Youssef El Fidali

Since the advent of quantum physics, many experiments, theories and models helped to lay the foundationsfor the understanding of interaction between light and matter or the behavior of microscopic (subatomic)particles. However, many questions remain unanswered or at least not fully understood. One of the mostdebated topics since the last century concerns the entanglement between two or more particles. This paperwill deal with this issue and maybe give a definitive answer to this problematic.

•May 5, 2023•0 citations

Dissolving the EPR Paradox: Quantum Entanglement as Topological Non-Separability in a Discrete Substrate

Néstor E Ramos

Quantum entanglement remains the most contentious phenomenon in modern physics, famously described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance." The standard interpretation relies on the instantaneous collapse of a non-local wave function, a mechanism that blatantly challenges the speed-of-light limit, or alternatively, relies on "superdeterminism", a conceptual patch suggesting all variables were correlated since the Big Bang. We demonstrate that under the framework of Computational Finitism, the EPR paradox is entirely dissolved. By modeling the universe as a discrete, Modulo-9 causal graph, we prove that entangled particles are not independent objects communicating across space. Instead, they are a single, indivisible topological knot projected onto two spatial coordinates. We present a deterministic simulation (The Finitism Entanglement Automaton) that achieves 100.0% perfect anti-correlation without any signal propagation, ontological randomness, or faster-than-light communication. Entanglement is not magic; it is the macroscopic observation of a non-separable algebraic identity.

•Oct 11, 2026•0 citations

Tim Maudlin, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics (Aristotelian Society Series, Volume 13), Oxford UK & Cambridge USA:

Andrew Wayne

Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity has the rare quality of being both a significant contribution to the philosophy of physics literature and a superb introduction for philosophers unacquainted with the field. Maudlin sets out to examine the implications for our understanding of the fundamental structure of space, time, and causation of what appears to be a mysterious action-at-a-distance observed in the quantum domain. Physicists and philosophers of physics have been grappling with these implications for the last half-century, and Maudlin does a remarkable job of elucidating central themes in the literature and clarifying conceptual confusions. Throughout the book, Maudlin draws out salient points from what can easily become a morass of scientific and philosophical technicalities. At the root of puzzles concerning relativity and quantum mechanics lie a few simple experimental facts. In an experimental setup in which quantum particles begin from a common source and travel in opposite directions, distant (spacelike separated) measurements of properties of the two particles are strangely correlated. These correlations have been observed, for example, in experiments which measure polarization properties of photons. A well-known theorem due to John S. (1964) expresses a constraint on the kind of correlations that measurement outcomes in this experimental setup (known as a Bell experiment) can display, in the absence of any communication between them. The surprise is that observed correlations violate Bell's theorem, meaning that the measurement events appear somehow to be influencing each other or to be otherwise connected. But there's the rub: in experiments, measurements are spacelike separated, which means they are too far apart for any force of nature travelling at or below the speed of light to traverse the distance between them in time. Faster-than-light influences seem to fly squarely (and rather quickly) in the face of everything Einstein taught us about the structure of space and time. As it is often understood, the special theory of relativity asserts that the speed of light in a vacuum is some sort of physical limit, and that matter, energy, signals, causal influence, and the like cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Do the

•Jan 1, 1997•6 citations

Quantum Entanglement & Time

Michele Caponigro

In this essay, we explore temporal Bell Inequalities in order to introduce the notion of entanglement in Time.

Prespacetime journal•Nov 23, 2017•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement and Non-Local Decoherence

Francesco Forte

Why quantum entanglement and decoherence appear to violate the speed of light.

•Jul 12, 2026•0 citations
Of all the mysteries that have confronted physicists in the past century surely entanglement must rank amongst the most perplexing. Not only does this phenomenon express itself over apparently arbitrarily large distances and barriers between two particles but it also expresses itself across time! I propose a model using higher dimensional space which conceptually can reconcile the apparent problems presented by entanglement - that of communicating faster than the speed of light and even communicating into the future.
Quantum entanglement, a term coined by Erwin Schrodinger in 1935, is a mechanical phenomenon at the quantum level wherein the quantum states of two (or more) particles have to be described with reference to each other though these particles may be spatially separated. This phenomenon leads to paradox and has puzzled us for a long time. The behaviour of entangled particles is apparently inexplicable, incomprehensible and like magic at work. Locality has been a reliable and fruitful principle which has guided us to the triumphs of twentieth century physics. But the consequences of the local laws in quantum theory could seem “spooky” and nonlocal, with some theorists questioning locality itself. Could two subatomic particles on opposite sides of the universe be really instantaneously connected? Is any theory which predicts such a connection essentially flawed or incomplete? Are the results of experiments which demonstrate such a connection being misinterpreted? These questions challenge our most basic concepts of spatial distance and time. Modern physics is in the process of dismantling the space all around us and the universe will never be the same. Quantum entanglement involves the utilisation of cutting edge technology and will bring great benefits to society. This paper traces the development of quantum entanglement and presents some possible explanations for the strange behaviour of entangled particles. Published in International Journal of Automatic Control System, Vol. 5: Issue 2, 2019.
Quantum entanglement remains the most contentious phenomenon in modern physics, famously described by Einstein as "spooky action at a distance." The standard interpretation relies on the instantaneous collapse of a non-local wave function, a mechanism that blatantly challenges the speed-of-light limit, or alternatively, relies on "superdeterminism", a conceptual patch suggesting all variables were correlated since the Big Bang. We demonstrate that under the framework of Computational Finitism, the EPR paradox is entirely dissolved. By modeling the universe as a discrete, Modulo-9 causal graph, we prove that entangled particles are not independent objects communicating across space. Instead, they are a single, indivisible topological knot projected onto two spatial coordinates. We present a deterministic simulation (The Finitism Entanglement Automaton) that achieves 100.0% perfect anti-correlation without any signal propagation, ontological randomness, or faster-than-light communication. Entanglement is not magic; it is the macroscopic observation of a non-separable algebraic identity.
Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity has the rare quality of being both a significant contribution to the philosophy of physics literature and a superb introduction for philosophers unacquainted with the field. Maudlin sets out to examine the implications for our understanding of the fundamental structure of space, time, and causation of what appears to be a mysterious action-at-a-distance observed in the quantum domain. Physicists and philosophers of physics have been grappling with these implications for the last half-century, and Maudlin does a remarkable job of elucidating central themes in the literature and clarifying conceptual confusions. Throughout the book, Maudlin draws out salient points from what can easily become a morass of scientific and philosophical technicalities. At the root of puzzles concerning relativity and quantum mechanics lie a few simple experimental facts. In an experimental setup in which quantum particles begin from a common source and travel in opposite directions, distant (spacelike separated) measurements of properties of the two particles are strangely correlated. These correlations have been observed, for example, in experiments which measure polarization properties of photons. A well-known theorem due to John S. (1964) expresses a constraint on the kind of correlations that measurement outcomes in this experimental setup (known as a Bell experiment) can display, in the absence of any communication between them. The surprise is that observed correlations violate Bell's theorem, meaning that the measurement events appear somehow to be influencing each other or to be otherwise connected. But there's the rub: in experiments, measurements are spacelike separated, which means they are too far apart for any force of nature travelling at or below the speed of light to traverse the distance between them in time. Faster-than-light influences seem to fly squarely (and rather quickly) in the face of everything Einstein taught us about the structure of space and time. As it is often understood, the special theory of relativity asserts that the speed of light in a vacuum is some sort of physical limit, and that matter, energy, signals, causal influence, and the like cannot travel faster than the speed of light. Do the