Cambridge University Press eBooks

Bohr's generalization of classical mechanics

Alisa Bokulich

Published Oct 2, 2008• 0 citations

Abstract

Something is rotten in the state of Denmark. Shakespeare , Hamlet, Act 1 Scene 4 The rise and fall of the old quantum theory The principles of the old quantum theory were first articulated by Niels Bohr in 1913 in a three-part paper titled “On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules.” Bohr had adopted Ernest Rutherford's model of the atom, according to which the mass of the atom is concentrated in a small central nucleus, while the electrons orbit the nucleus in planetary trajectories. The key challenge facing Rutherford's model was that it was unstable: according to classical electrodynamics, the electron, which is a moving charged body, should radiate energy and so eventually collapse into the nucleus. Bohr's solution was to incorporate Max Planck's theory of radiation, according to which “the energy radiation from an atomic system does not take place in the continuous way assumed in ordinary electrodynamics, but that it, on the contrary, takes place in distinctly separated emissions” (Bohr 1913, p. 4; BCW 2, p. 164). In this early paper, and most subsequent accounts, Bohr summarized his quantum theory by means of two assumptions or postulates. According to the first postulate, electrons cannot travel in any path they like around the nucleus, rather atomic systems can only exist in a series of discrete “stationary states,” in which the electron is in a particular allowed stable periodic orbit and is not emitting radiation.

DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511751813.005

Related papers

Introduction to Quantum Mechanics

Bala Ramu Ramachandran

Most textbooks say that quantum mechanics came into being when Max Planck, in a desperate attempt to construct a theory that explained experimental data, explored the radical idea of energy being radiated or absorbed by all bodies in discrete packets (or quanta). The energy content of a quantum of radiation is proportional to the frequency of the radiation emitted or absorbed, as in , and the proportionality constant bears the name of Planck. Planck himself was rather uncomfortable with the idea of energy packets, and spent a considerable amount of time in later years trying to “restore” the classical picture of continuous energy exchange between bodies and surroundings. However, in 1905 Einstein was able to use the idea of the quantum to explain the mechanism of the photoelectric effect, which cannot be explained in any other way! This established the reality of the quantum and so, it may be said that Einstein, rather than Planck, is the father of quantum mechanics. Within a few years, Neils Bohr constructed his model of the hydrogen atom in which the electron can only occupy certain special orbits around the nucleus, and any jump between these orbits is accompanied by energy being absorbed or emitted in the form of quanta. The nearly exact agreement of Bohr’s predictions based on the model and observed hydrogen atomic spectra was among the first impressive accomplishments of quantum mechanics.

Jan 1, 199827 citations

Bohr’s Quantum: 1926–

“How wonderful that we have met with a paradox. Now we have some hope of making progress,” said Niels Bohr with characteristic irony. The quantum view of the atom began with Bohr. Coming from Denmark, he worked with Rutherford, who although famously skeptical about theoreticians, supported him. Max Planck had previously introduced the idea of the quantum, and Einstein had extended it from matter to light, but Bohr’s proposal that electrons can adjust their orbits only by quantum leaps was revolutionary. The next revolution was Schrödinger’s description of electrons as waves instead of particles. This led to recognition of the wave–particle duality. The rest of the 20th century was marked by the realization that the apparently fundamental particles of the nucleus, the proton and the neutron, each actually consisted of a series of sub-particles. The wave–particle duality created a baffling series of paradoxes. Following revolutions tended to be driven by theoreticians, and massive team efforts were required to identify the sub-particles experimentally.

Royal Society of Chemistry eBooksJan 12, 20260 citations

Guiding Principles

Anthony Duncan A, Michel Janssen B

Abstract The development of the complex of assumptions and methods now referred to as the “old quantum theory” mainly took place in the first five years following the introduction of the Bohr atomic model in 1913. Three guiding principles emerged that were used, sometimes in overlapping ways, to explain the flood of spectroscopic data that needed to be explained. First, quantization rules (or conditions) were proposed to single out the allowed orbital motions of electrons in atoms. These rules were derived in various forms by Planck, Sommerfeld, and Wilson, but were put into their most general form by Schwarzschild, who recognized the underlying principle as the quantization of the action variables of a multiply periodic classical system. Second, the special role of the action variables in quantization was given convincing support by the transfer of the adiabatic principle of mechanics to quantum theory (work primarily due to Paul Ehrenfest). Third, the correspondence principle, or statement of asymptotic coincidence of quantum and classical theory in the limit of large quantum numbers, originally introduced by Bohr in 1913 as a supporting argument for his quantization of angular momentum in his theory of the hydrogen atom, was extended by Bohr and Kramers to provide selection rules and approximate intensity predictions evening the regime low quantum numbers.

Aug 29, 20191 citation

2 Quantum mechanics

Anthony C. Fischer-Cripps

In 1897, Thomson demonstrated that cathode rays (observed to be emitted from the cathodes of vacuum tubes) were in fact charged particles which he called electrons. Thomson proposed that the atom consisted of a positively charged sphere in which were embedded negatively charged electrons. Rutherford subsequently found in 1911 that the electrons orbited at some distance from a central positively charged nucleus. Rutherford proposed that electrostatic attraction between the nucleus and the electron was balanced by the centrifugal force arising from the orbital motion. However, if this were the case, then the electrons (being accelerated inwards towards the center of rotation) would continuously radiate all their energy as electromagnetic waves and very quickly fall into the nucleus. In 1913, Bohr postulated two important additions to Rutherford’s theory of atomic structure: 1. Electrons can orbit the nucleus in what are called stationary states in which no emission of radiation occurs and in which the angular momentum L is constrained to have values: 2. Electrons can make transitions from one state to another accompanied by the emission or absorption of a single photon of energy E = hf thus leading to absorption and emission spectra.

CRC Press eBooksAug 22, 20070 citations

The Arrival of Bohr’s Atomic Theory

David K. Ferry

The aim of Niels Bohr’s “great” paper was to try to explain how Ernest Rutherford’s planetary model of the atom could exist. Bohr never used the words “quantum jump” in the paper, but it became very much in vogue shortly after this. Max Planck and even A. Einstein had not yet made the full evolution beyond classical physics, and the purely classical atomic views of Rutherford and H. Nagaoka did not provide the explanation of the absorption and emission spectra of hydrogen. In truth, Bohr’s “theory” consisted of a very few equations, with very great assumptions. As de Broglie’s work became known, he was hailed for his advances and he would join the list of Nobel Prizes for advances in quantum theory. Wolfgang Pauli did not particularly like the wave and particle approach that de Broglie introduced with his pilot waves in 1924, and would forcefully express these objections a few years later at the Solvay conference.

Jan 2, 20190 citations

Rise and premature fall of the old quantum theory

Manfred Bucher

The old quantum theory of Bohr and Sommerfeld was abandonned for the wrong reason. Its contradictions were caused not by the orbit concept but by a mental barrier—the inconceivability that an electron might collide with the atomic nucleus. Removing that barrier resolves the theory’s main failures—incorrect orbital momenta, He atom, H + 2 molecule ion. The inclusion of electron oscillations through the nucleus—a concept called “Coulomb oscillator”—renders the old quantum theory consistent with quantum mechanics (although devoid of wave character). The triple success of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model is its correct description of the H atom (and one-electron ions) concerning (1) the energy levels Enl, (2) the orbital angular momenta Lnl—if corrected as L 2 = l(l + 1)~ 2 and with the Coulomb oscillator included—and (3) the orbits’ space quantization—with (Lnl)z = ml~. These achievements are succinctly represented by the principal, angular and magnetic quantum numbers (n, l, ml) and visualized by orbital ellipse geometry—major axis, vertex curvature, and tilt angle, respectively. Orbit geometry also accounts for the average orbit size. Moreover, the Coulomb oscillator provides a natural explanation of (isotropic) hyperfine interaction. The shortcomings of the old quantum theory lie in its neglect of three properties of particles—their spin, their wave nature and their quantum statistics. These deficiencies notwithstanding, the visual appeal of the Bohr-Sommerfeld model remains a pedagogical asset to complement the abstract character of quantum mechanics.

Jan 1, 20087 citations