Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Physical Review A

Laboratory observation of quantum control level sets (11 pages)

Jonathan Roslund

Published Jan 1, 2006• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Related papers

Exploring the level sets of quantum control landscapes (9 pages)

Adam E. Rothman

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Quantum control limited by quantum decoherence (10 pages)

Che Sun, Sixia Yu, Fei Xue

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•2 citations

Probabilistic quantum control via indirect measurement (6 pages)

J. W. Clark, Aikaterini Mandilara

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2005•4 citations

Laboratory observation of quantum control level sets

Jonathan Roslund, Matthias Roth, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ

In controlled quantum dynamics, a level set is defined as the collection of control fields that produce a specific value for a particular observable. This paper explores the relationship between individual solutions to a control problem, and presents the first experimentally observed quantum control level sets, which are found to be continuous submanifolds. Level sets are observed for two photon transitions where the control is the spectral phase function, which is expressed as a fourth-order polynomial. For the systems studied here, the level sets are shown to be closed surfaces in the spectral phase control space. A perturbation analysis provides insight into the observed topology of the level set, which is shown to be preserved by the low-order polynomial phase representation. Each of the multiple control fields forming a level set preserves the observable value by its own distinct manipulation of constructive and destructive quantum interferences. Thus, the richness of quantum control fields meeting a particular observable value is accompanied by an equally diverse family of control mechanisms.

Physical Review A•Oct 18, 2006•36 citations

A self-guided algorithm for learning control of quantum-mechanical systems

Minh Q. Phan, HERSCHEL A. RABITZ

This paper presents a general self-guided algorithm for direct laboratory learning of controls to manipulate quantum-mechanical systems. The primary focus is on an algorithm based on the learning of a linear laboratory input–output map from a sequence of controls, and their observed impact on the quantum-mechanical system. This map is then employed in an iterative fashion, to sequentially home in on the desired objective. The objective may be a target state at a final time, or a continuously weighted observational trajectory. The self-guided aspects of the algorithm are based on implementing a cost functional that only contains laboratory-accessible information. Through choice of the weights in this functional, the algorithm can automatically stay within the bounds of each local linear map and indicate when a new map is necessary for additional iterative improvement. Finally, these concepts can be generalized to include the possibility of employing nonlinear maps, as well as just the laboratory control instrument settings, rather than observation of the control itself. An illustrative simulation of the concepts is presented for the control of a four-level quantum system.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 1, 1999•37 citations

STUDIES IN QUANTUM CONTROL AND QUANTUM INFORMATION

PNG WEN HAN

•Mar 3, 2026•0 citations
In controlled quantum dynamics, a level set is defined as the collection of control fields that produce a specific value for a particular observable. This paper explores the relationship between individual solutions to a control problem, and presents the first experimentally observed quantum control level sets, which are found to be continuous submanifolds. Level sets are observed for two photon transitions where the control is the spectral phase function, which is expressed as a fourth-order polynomial. For the systems studied here, the level sets are shown to be closed surfaces in the spectral phase control space. A perturbation analysis provides insight into the observed topology of the level set, which is shown to be preserved by the low-order polynomial phase representation. Each of the multiple control fields forming a level set preserves the observable value by its own distinct manipulation of constructive and destructive quantum interferences. Thus, the richness of quantum control fields meeting a particular observable value is accompanied by an equally diverse family of control mechanisms.
This paper presents a general self-guided algorithm for direct laboratory learning of controls to manipulate quantum-mechanical systems. The primary focus is on an algorithm based on the learning of a linear laboratory input–output map from a sequence of controls, and their observed impact on the quantum-mechanical system. This map is then employed in an iterative fashion, to sequentially home in on the desired objective. The objective may be a target state at a final time, or a continuously weighted observational trajectory. The self-guided aspects of the algorithm are based on implementing a cost functional that only contains laboratory-accessible information. Through choice of the weights in this functional, the algorithm can automatically stay within the bounds of each local linear map and indicate when a new map is necessary for additional iterative improvement. Finally, these concepts can be generalized to include the possibility of employing nonlinear maps, as well as just the laboratory control instrument settings, rather than observation of the control itself. An illustrative simulation of the concepts is presented for the control of a four-level quantum system.