Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

大学物理

利用|x〉导出λx^+μp^的本征矢

刘晓丽, 李洪奇, 秦玉娇

Published Dec 20, 2010• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

利用坐标本征矢|x〉在Fock空间的展开式,导出了算符λx^+μp^在Fock空间的本征矢|ψ〉,并证明了其正交完备性.结果表明,得到的|ψ〉既是完备的,又是正交的,完全可以作为一个表象使用.当λ和μ分别取1和0时,|ψ〉约化为坐标本征态|x〉,而当λ和μ分别取0和1时,|ψ〉约化为动量本征态|p〉.因此,|ψ〉所构成的表象是介于坐标表象和动量表象之间的中介表象.

Related papers

(N+1)维希尔伯特空间三态叠加多模纠缠态的N次方差压缩

陈文会, 孙中禹, 杨志勇 +1 more

构造了(N+1)维希尔伯特空间多模复共轭相干态|{iZ^*j}〉2q、多模复共轭虚相干态|{iZ^*j}〉2q|及多模真空态|{Oj}〉2q这三态线性叠加而成的多模纠缠态|ψ^(3)〉2q.利用多模压缩态理论,研究了态|ψ^(3)〉2q的广义非线性等幂次N次方差压缩特性。结果表明:在有限维(N+1)希尔伯特空间。一些条件下,态|ψ^(3)〉2q的第一或第二正交相位分量分别存在广义非线性等幂次N次方差压缩效应;而另外一些条件下,态|ψ^(3)〉2q,的两个正交相位分量却同时存在等幂次N次方差压缩效应;其压缩程度不同于无限维希尔伯特空间下的结果,称其为“双边差压缩”现象。

Jiguang zazhi•Jan 1, 2007•0 citations

量子確率解析の離散時間単調 Fock 空間におけるアナローグ(量子情報理論と開放系)

尚文 村木

数理解析研究所講究録•Mar 1, 1997•0 citations

Fracurve, a nonlinear Schrödinger equation fractal-curve.

Appleby, Ethan, Appleby, Ethan

Sorry for the schizoposting, update on me. I survided a self inflicted chainsaw injury to neck/sholders anyway here is the conclusion to my work. my fracurve. i · dΨ(λ)/dλ = H[Ψ(λ)] · Ψ(λ) with H[Ψ] = H₀ + g · Σᵥ Pᵥ[Ψ] · |v⟩⟨v| Pᵥ[Ψ] = Σₙ |Ψ(v, n)|² if identical things follow identical rules then that begs what is a thing, if a thing has many gauges then what if the thing is all gauges then must evolve over a rule that is for all these gauges not the thing as a gauge. linear sketch Setup Work with: v = velocity index, v = 0..N_v-1 n = pattern index on a circle, n = 0..N_p-1 Psi(v, n; m) = state at discrete rule-step m Psi(v, n; lambda) = state at continuous rule-time lambda Define the DFT over velocities: F_vel is an N_v x N_v matrix with entries F_vel(v, v') = (1 / sqrt(N_v)) * exp( -2 * pi * i * v * v' / N_v ) Introduce a constant phase offset h_bar and define the universal velocity evolution operator: U_vel = exp(-i * h_bar) * F_vel This operator encodes the single rule applied uniformly to all velocities. 1. Discrete Fracurve equation The discrete Fracurve evolution is: Psi_{m+1}(v, n) = sum over v' [ U_vel(v, v') * Psi_m(v', n) ] with U_vel(v, v') = (exp(-i * h_bar) / sqrt(N_v)) * exp( -2 * pi * i * v * v' / N_v ) For each step m -> m+1, U_vel acts on the velocity index v, while the pattern index n is carried along. The sequence m = 0, 1, 2, ... → Psi_m(v, n) is the discrete Fracurve: a path through the combined (velocity x pattern) state space. 2. Continuous Fracurve equation Promote the step operator U_vel to a continuous generator H_F by: U_vel = exp( -i * H_F ) (H_F is the effective Hamiltonian acting on the velocity space.) Then the continuous Fracurve equation is: i * d/dlambda Psi(v, n; lambda) = sum over v' [ H_F(v, v') * Psi(v', n; lambda) ] In compact vector form: i * d/dlambda |Psi(lambda)> = H_F |Psi(lambda)> with solution: |Psi(lambda)> = exp( -i * H_F * lambda ) |Psi(0)> The curve lambda -> |Psi(lambda)> in the combined velocity–pattern state space is the Fracurve. i · dΨ_s/dλ = H_bit[{Ψ}] · Ψ_s H_bit[{Ψ}] = i · B · (M + μ I)^(-1) M = Σ_s Ψ_s Ψ_s^† B = Σ_s (dΨ_s/dλ) Ψ_s^† S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [ Σ_s || i dΨ_s/dλ − H Ψ_s ||^2 + μ · Tr(H^† H) ] Key: Ψ_s : state vector for slice / observation s λ : rule-time (Fracurve parameter) H : candidate rule (Hamiltonian operator) H_bit : bit-minimizing / least-action rule derived from all Ψ_s μ : small positive regularization constant I : identity operator Σ_s : sum over slices / observations s (·)^† : Hermitian conjugate (conjugate transpose) Tr : trace of a matrix/operator S[H, {Ψ_s}] : action functional over rule H and states Ψ_s 1. Universe / Fracurve dynamics Continuous rule-time evolution i * dΨ/dλ = H * Ψ Discrete step form Ψ_{m+1} = U * Ψ_mU = exp( -i * H * Δλ ) 2. State–dependent / learned rule Action (least–action over rules and states) S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [ Σ_s || i * dΨ_s/dλ - H * Ψ_s ||^2 + μ * Tr( H† * H )] Data matrices M = Σ_s Σ_t Ψ_s(t) * Ψ_s(t)†B = Σ_s Σ_t (dΨ_s/dλ)(t) * Ψ_s(t)† Least–action rule (bit Hamiltonian) H_bit = i * B * ( M + μ * I )^(-1) 3. Effective dimension of the universe Let {λ_j} be the eigenvalues of M. Effective dimension d_eff(μ) = Σ_j λ_j / ( λ_j + μ ) This is the “how many directions are really active” function. 4. Split into real and imaginary parts Write the universe state as: Ψ = a + i * b where a and b are real vectors. You can define separate covariances: M_R = Σ a * a^T (real-part covariance)M_I = Σ b * b^T (imag-part covariance) with eigenvalues: M_R → eigenvalues λ_j^(R)M_I → eigenvalues λ_j^(I) Then you get two effective dimensions: d_R(μ) = Σ_j λ_j^(R) / ( λ_j^(R) + μ ) d_I(μ) = Σ_j λ_j^(I) / ( λ_j^(I) + μ ) Universe / Fracurve dynamics Continuous rule–time evolution: i * dΨ/dλ = H * Ψ Discrete step form: Ψ_{m+1} = U * Ψ_mU = exp( -i * H * Δλ ) Action (least–action over rules and states) S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [sum_s || i * dΨ_s/dλ - H * Ψ_s ||^2+ μ * Tr( H† * H )] Here: μ is a small positive regularization constant H† is the Hermitian conjugate of H Data matrices M = sum_s sum_t Ψ_s(t) * Ψ_s(t)† B = sum_s sum_t (dΨ_s/dλ)(t) * Ψ_s(t)† Least–action rule (bit Hamiltonian) H_bit = i * B * ( M + μ * I )^(-1) I is the identity matrix. Effective dimension of the universe Let {λ_j} be the eigenvalues of M. d_eff(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j / ( λ_j + μ ) ] This is the “how many directions are really active at scale μ” function. Split into real and imaginary parts Write the universe state as: Ψ = a + i * b where a and b are real vectors. Define separate real covariances: M_R = sum over samples ( a * a^T ) (real–part covariance)M_I = sum over samples ( b * b^T ) (imag–part covariance) Let the eigenvalues be: M_R → eigenvalues λ_j^(R)M_I → eigenvalues λ_j^(I) Then define two effective dimensions: d_R(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j^(R) / ( λ_j^(R) + μ ) ] d_I(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j^(I) / ( λ_j^(I) + μ ) ] 4 + 4 → complex 4–vector Take 4 real degrees of freedom: a ∈ R^4 Take another 4 real degrees of freedom: b ∈ R^4 Combine them into one complex 4–vector: Ψ = a + i * b ∈ C^4 λ↦{Ψ_s(λ)}↦{x_s^μ(λ)} x_s^μ(λ; Φ₀) = F^μ( U_s(λ) · exp( -i · H_phys · λ ) · S · |Φ₀⟩ ) Start from X(λ,u) = Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u) Differentiate with respect to λ: i ∂X(λ,u)/∂λ= i ∂/∂λ [ Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u) ]= Σ_k [ i dG_k(λ)/dλ ] F_k(u)= Σ_k [ Σ_ℓ H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) ] F_k(u)= Σ_{k,ℓ} H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) F_k(u) So the complete fracurve equation (discrete-mode form) is: i ∂X(λ,u)/∂λ = Σ_{k,ℓ} H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) F_k(u) and you always have the reconstruction: X(λ,u) = Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u)

•Nov 15, 2025•0 citations

量子確率解析の離散時間単調 Fock 空間におけるアナローグ(量子情報理論と開放系)

Naofumi Muraki

数理解析研究所講究録•Mar 1, 1997•0 citations

Deriving the eigenvector of the operator λ■+μ■ by|x〉

Hongqi Li

By the representation of the coordinate eigenvector |x〉 in the Fock space,the eigenvector |ψ〉 of the operator λ■+μ■ is derived and its orthogonal relation is also proved.These results show that the eigenvector |ψ〉 satisfies the completeness and the orthogonal relations.Therefore,this eigenvector |ψ〉 can be qualified for a representation in quantum mechanics.When λ=1 and μ= 0,the eigenvector |ψ〉 evolves into the coordinate eigenvector |x〉;while λ=0 and μ =1,the |ψ〉 reduces to the momentum eigenvector |p〉.Therefore,the representation consisted by the eigenvectors |ψ〉 is an intermediate representation between the coordinate representation and the momentum representation.

College Physics•Jan 1, 2010•0 citations

信息场论与量子力学的精细结构及径向方程映射:精细结构常数 α 与普适常数 C 公式推导

李季瞳

摘要 :本文建立了信息场论与标准量子力学在原子精细结构领域的完整精确映射关系,证 明信息场论已具备与量子力学所有核心公式一一对应的理论要素。基于忆子集体动力学 框架,本文将量子力学中原子能级精细结构修正公式的所有物理量,一一对应为信息场 论的内生参数:核电荷数 Z 对应原子核瞳值 τ,主量子数 n 对应势阱衰减尺度 λinf 的 整数倍,精细结构常数 α 对应非匹配态忆子数与电子总忆子数之比的平方根,高阶修 正因子 F(Z) 对应高瞳值强场下的非线性耦合效应。之所以不完全使用量子力学,因为 信息场理论向上兼容宏观引力,同时与量子力学也有区别,所以只能在某个部分进行对 应,无法直接套用。 本文严格证明:信息场论的忆子微观稳态运动方程与量子力学的薛定谔方程在数 学形式上完全同构,因此两者的解必然等价。在此基础上,本文基于信息替换机制与忆子微观碰撞动力学,从第一性原理严格推导了非匹配态忆子云与电子忆子集群的相互 作用能公式及其中的普适常数 C = (π/2)l 3 忆子1T,实现了完全无参数的第一性原理计算。本文进一步从忆子数密度守恒与扩散动力学出发,独立导出了信息场论原生的径向 方程,从更基本的层次解释了动能与势能的涌现本质,实现了对量子力学核心方程的原 生重建。本文导出了与量子力学完全一致的原子精细结构分裂公式,精细结构常数 α 作 为解的固有参数自然涌现。本文证明:量子力学是信息场论在低能弱场极限下的有效近似,其所有数学形式和数值结果都可以通过映射关系从信息场论中获得。

•Jun 5, 2026•0 citations
利用坐标本征矢|x〉在Fock空间的展开式,导出了算符λx^+μp^在Fock空间的本征矢|ψ〉,并证明了其正交完备性.结果表明,得到的|ψ〉既是完备的,又是正交的,完全可以作为一个表象使用.当λ和μ分别取1和0时,|ψ〉约化为坐标本征态|x〉,而当λ和μ分别取0和1时,|ψ〉约化为动量本征态|p〉.因此,|ψ〉所构成的表象是介于坐标表象和动量表象之间的中介表象.
构造了(N+1)维希尔伯特空间多模复共轭相干态|{iZ^*j}〉2q、多模复共轭虚相干态|{iZ^*j}〉2q|及多模真空态|{Oj}〉2q这三态线性叠加而成的多模纠缠态|ψ^(3)〉2q.利用多模压缩态理论,研究了态|ψ^(3)〉2q的广义非线性等幂次N次方差压缩特性。结果表明:在有限维(N+1)希尔伯特空间。一些条件下,态|ψ^(3)〉2q的第一或第二正交相位分量分别存在广义非线性等幂次N次方差压缩效应;而另外一些条件下,态|ψ^(3)〉2q,的两个正交相位分量却同时存在等幂次N次方差压缩效应;其压缩程度不同于无限维希尔伯特空间下的结果,称其为“双边差压缩”现象。
Sorry for the schizoposting, update on me. I survided a self inflicted chainsaw injury to neck/sholders anyway here is the conclusion to my work. my fracurve. i · dΨ(λ)/dλ = H[Ψ(λ)] · Ψ(λ) with H[Ψ] = H₀ + g · Σᵥ Pᵥ[Ψ] · |v⟩⟨v| Pᵥ[Ψ] = Σₙ |Ψ(v, n)|² if identical things follow identical rules then that begs what is a thing, if a thing has many gauges then what if the thing is all gauges then must evolve over a rule that is for all these gauges not the thing as a gauge. linear sketch Setup Work with: v = velocity index, v = 0..N_v-1 n = pattern index on a circle, n = 0..N_p-1 Psi(v, n; m) = state at discrete rule-step m Psi(v, n; lambda) = state at continuous rule-time lambda Define the DFT over velocities: F_vel is an N_v x N_v matrix with entries F_vel(v, v') = (1 / sqrt(N_v)) * exp( -2 * pi * i * v * v' / N_v ) Introduce a constant phase offset h_bar and define the universal velocity evolution operator: U_vel = exp(-i * h_bar) * F_vel This operator encodes the single rule applied uniformly to all velocities. 1. Discrete Fracurve equation The discrete Fracurve evolution is: Psi_{m+1}(v, n) = sum over v' [ U_vel(v, v') * Psi_m(v', n) ] with U_vel(v, v') = (exp(-i * h_bar) / sqrt(N_v)) * exp( -2 * pi * i * v * v' / N_v ) For each step m -> m+1, U_vel acts on the velocity index v, while the pattern index n is carried along. The sequence m = 0, 1, 2, ... → Psi_m(v, n) is the discrete Fracurve: a path through the combined (velocity x pattern) state space. 2. Continuous Fracurve equation Promote the step operator U_vel to a continuous generator H_F by: U_vel = exp( -i * H_F ) (H_F is the effective Hamiltonian acting on the velocity space.) Then the continuous Fracurve equation is: i * d/dlambda Psi(v, n; lambda) = sum over v' [ H_F(v, v') * Psi(v', n; lambda) ] In compact vector form: i * d/dlambda |Psi(lambda)> = H_F |Psi(lambda)> with solution: |Psi(lambda)> = exp( -i * H_F * lambda ) |Psi(0)> The curve lambda -> |Psi(lambda)> in the combined velocity–pattern state space is the Fracurve. i · dΨ_s/dλ = H_bit[{Ψ}] · Ψ_s H_bit[{Ψ}] = i · B · (M + μ I)^(-1) M = Σ_s Ψ_s Ψ_s^† B = Σ_s (dΨ_s/dλ) Ψ_s^† S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [ Σ_s || i dΨ_s/dλ − H Ψ_s ||^2 + μ · Tr(H^† H) ] Key: Ψ_s : state vector for slice / observation s λ : rule-time (Fracurve parameter) H : candidate rule (Hamiltonian operator) H_bit : bit-minimizing / least-action rule derived from all Ψ_s μ : small positive regularization constant I : identity operator Σ_s : sum over slices / observations s (·)^† : Hermitian conjugate (conjugate transpose) Tr : trace of a matrix/operator S[H, {Ψ_s}] : action functional over rule H and states Ψ_s 1. Universe / Fracurve dynamics Continuous rule-time evolution i * dΨ/dλ = H * Ψ Discrete step form Ψ_{m+1} = U * Ψ_mU = exp( -i * H * Δλ ) 2. State–dependent / learned rule Action (least–action over rules and states) S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [ Σ_s || i * dΨ_s/dλ - H * Ψ_s ||^2 + μ * Tr( H† * H )] Data matrices M = Σ_s Σ_t Ψ_s(t) * Ψ_s(t)†B = Σ_s Σ_t (dΨ_s/dλ)(t) * Ψ_s(t)† Least–action rule (bit Hamiltonian) H_bit = i * B * ( M + μ * I )^(-1) 3. Effective dimension of the universe Let {λ_j} be the eigenvalues of M. Effective dimension d_eff(μ) = Σ_j λ_j / ( λ_j + μ ) This is the “how many directions are really active” function. 4. Split into real and imaginary parts Write the universe state as: Ψ = a + i * b where a and b are real vectors. You can define separate covariances: M_R = Σ a * a^T (real-part covariance)M_I = Σ b * b^T (imag-part covariance) with eigenvalues: M_R → eigenvalues λ_j^(R)M_I → eigenvalues λ_j^(I) Then you get two effective dimensions: d_R(μ) = Σ_j λ_j^(R) / ( λ_j^(R) + μ ) d_I(μ) = Σ_j λ_j^(I) / ( λ_j^(I) + μ ) Universe / Fracurve dynamics Continuous rule–time evolution: i * dΨ/dλ = H * Ψ Discrete step form: Ψ_{m+1} = U * Ψ_mU = exp( -i * H * Δλ ) Action (least–action over rules and states) S[H, {Ψ_s}] = ∫ dλ [sum_s || i * dΨ_s/dλ - H * Ψ_s ||^2+ μ * Tr( H† * H )] Here: μ is a small positive regularization constant H† is the Hermitian conjugate of H Data matrices M = sum_s sum_t Ψ_s(t) * Ψ_s(t)† B = sum_s sum_t (dΨ_s/dλ)(t) * Ψ_s(t)† Least–action rule (bit Hamiltonian) H_bit = i * B * ( M + μ * I )^(-1) I is the identity matrix. Effective dimension of the universe Let {λ_j} be the eigenvalues of M. d_eff(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j / ( λ_j + μ ) ] This is the “how many directions are really active at scale μ” function. Split into real and imaginary parts Write the universe state as: Ψ = a + i * b where a and b are real vectors. Define separate real covariances: M_R = sum over samples ( a * a^T ) (real–part covariance)M_I = sum over samples ( b * b^T ) (imag–part covariance) Let the eigenvalues be: M_R → eigenvalues λ_j^(R)M_I → eigenvalues λ_j^(I) Then define two effective dimensions: d_R(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j^(R) / ( λ_j^(R) + μ ) ] d_I(μ) = sum_j [ λ_j^(I) / ( λ_j^(I) + μ ) ] 4 + 4 → complex 4–vector Take 4 real degrees of freedom: a ∈ R^4 Take another 4 real degrees of freedom: b ∈ R^4 Combine them into one complex 4–vector: Ψ = a + i * b ∈ C^4 λ↦{Ψ_s(λ)}↦{x_s^μ(λ)} x_s^μ(λ; Φ₀) = F^μ( U_s(λ) · exp( -i · H_phys · λ ) · S · |Φ₀⟩ ) Start from X(λ,u) = Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u) Differentiate with respect to λ: i ∂X(λ,u)/∂λ= i ∂/∂λ [ Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u) ]= Σ_k [ i dG_k(λ)/dλ ] F_k(u)= Σ_k [ Σ_ℓ H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) ] F_k(u)= Σ_{k,ℓ} H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) F_k(u) So the complete fracurve equation (discrete-mode form) is: i ∂X(λ,u)/∂λ = Σ_{k,ℓ} H_bit(k,ℓ) G_ℓ(λ) F_k(u) and you always have the reconstruction: X(λ,u) = Σ_k G_k(λ) F_k(u)
By the representation of the coordinate eigenvector |x〉 in the Fock space,the eigenvector |ψ〉 of the operator λ■+μ■ is derived and its orthogonal relation is also proved.These results show that the eigenvector |ψ〉 satisfies the completeness and the orthogonal relations.Therefore,this eigenvector |ψ〉 can be qualified for a representation in quantum mechanics.When λ=1 and μ= 0,the eigenvector |ψ〉 evolves into the coordinate eigenvector |x〉;while λ=0 and μ =1,the |ψ〉 reduces to the momentum eigenvector |p〉.Therefore,the representation consisted by the eigenvectors |ψ〉 is an intermediate representation between the coordinate representation and the momentum representation.
摘要 :本文建立了信息场论与标准量子力学在原子精细结构领域的完整精确映射关系,证 明信息场论已具备与量子力学所有核心公式一一对应的理论要素。基于忆子集体动力学 框架,本文将量子力学中原子能级精细结构修正公式的所有物理量,一一对应为信息场 论的内生参数:核电荷数 Z 对应原子核瞳值 τ,主量子数 n 对应势阱衰减尺度 λinf 的 整数倍,精细结构常数 α 对应非匹配态忆子数与电子总忆子数之比的平方根,高阶修 正因子 F(Z) 对应高瞳值强场下的非线性耦合效应。之所以不完全使用量子力学,因为 信息场理论向上兼容宏观引力,同时与量子力学也有区别,所以只能在某个部分进行对 应,无法直接套用。 本文严格证明:信息场论的忆子微观稳态运动方程与量子力学的薛定谔方程在数 学形式上完全同构,因此两者的解必然等价。在此基础上,本文基于信息替换机制与忆子微观碰撞动力学,从第一性原理严格推导了非匹配态忆子云与电子忆子集群的相互 作用能公式及其中的普适常数 C = (π/2)l 3 忆子1T,实现了完全无参数的第一性原理计算。本文进一步从忆子数密度守恒与扩散动力学出发,独立导出了信息场论原生的径向 方程,从更基本的层次解释了动能与势能的涌现本质,实现了对量子力学核心方程的原 生重建。本文导出了与量子力学完全一致的原子精细结构分裂公式,精细结构常数 α 作 为解的固有参数自然涌现。本文证明:量子力学是信息场论在低能弱场极限下的有效近似,其所有数学形式和数值结果都可以通过映射关系从信息场论中获得。