arXiv:2610.41341
Time-Domain Multiplexing for Resource-Efficient Heralded GKP State Preparation
Ke-Ming Hu, Jun-Jie He, Yu-Ze Zhu, Pei-Lin Du, Lin Yang, Hao Tang, Xian-Min Jin
Abstract
Gottesman-Kitaev-Preskill (GKP) states are key resources for fault-tolerant photonic quantum computing, but their conditional preparation via Gaussian boson sampling involves a trade-off between source count and photon-number resolution. Distributing heralding photons across more measured modes reduces the resolution required per mode, yet increases the number of simultaneously operated squeezed sources in fully squeezed spatial architectures. Here, we show that time-domain multiplexing (TDM) can reduce these physical source requirements while preserving GKP state quality. Using an end-to-end differentiable Bargmann framework, we find that TDM circuits reusing one or two squeezed sources achieve fidelities comparable to fully squeezed spatial circuits across several configurations. Selected nine-mode configurations retain fidelities above 0.95 with one photon heralded in each measured mode, mitigating detector resolution demands without a proportional increase in source count. Loss-aware reoptimization further shows that, under the investigated spatial loss models, two-mode TDM maintains fidelities near 0.80 at 1.0 dB per channel, whereas the corresponding spatial benchmarks fall below 0.60. These results demonstrate that temporal reuse provides an effective architectural route for balancing source overhead, detection demands, and state preparation performance in the presence of optical loss.
AI Summary
The paper asks whether time-domain multiplexing (TDM) can reduce the physical squeezed-source count in photon-number-heralded GKP preparation while distributing heralding photons across more detectors. It compares single-loop circuits reusing one or two programmable squeezed sources with spatial interferometers having either all inputs squeezed or only two squeezed inputs. A differentiable Bargmann-kernel simulation optimizes fidelity, stabilizer-based effective squeezing, and heralding probability for total detected photon numbers $N=8$ and $12$. The target is a finite-energy square-lattice GKP $|0\rangle$ with $\Delta=\kappa=0.36$. For $N=8$ across nine modes, single- and two-source TDM achieve fidelities $0.9600$ and $0.9599$, versus $0.9582$ for nine spatial sources, with one photon detected in each measured mode. Corresponding success probabilities are $1.10\times10^{-6}$, $5.27\times10^{-6}$, and $2.37\times10^{-5}$. At $N=12$, thirteen-mode two-source TDM reaches $F=0.9611$ with probability $2.94\times10^{-7}$. Loss-aware reoptimization finds two-source TDM fidelities near $0.80$ at $1$ dB per specified spatial-loss channel, versus approximately $0.59$–$0.60$ for spatial benchmarks. These are not matched-loss advantages: spatial loss includes the retained output, whereas TDM spatial loss excludes the final retained loop mode; delay loss is evaluated separately. The results are numerical and configuration-dependent, with restricted TDM connectivity, programmable pulse-to-pulse settings, and reduced success probabilities for single-photon patterns. Equal physical source counts also do not imply equal numbers of squeezed input pulses. Loss-aware results undergo cutoff-convergence checks, with metric changes and conditional-state trace deficits below $10^{-7}$.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 13 pages, 5 figures