arXiv:2610.39577 · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Artificial Intelligence (QAI)
Adiabatic training of VQAs for entanglement detection
E. Acosta, C. Cano, D. Manzano, G. Botella
Abstract
This paper introduces a hybrid quantum framework for training Variational Quantum Algorithms (VQAs) aimed at addressing the fundamental problem of entanglement detection using adiabatic quantum computing. This problem is of foundational significance in quantum information science and has been approached through both classical and quantum methodologies. We propose an adiabatic-inspired optimization strategy for training VQAs, which combines a discretization of the parameter space with a hierarchical segmentation scheme. The optimization problem is formulated as a Quadratic Unconstrained Binary Optimization (QUBO) model to leverage the capabilities of quantum annealing. Preliminary results are compared against classical neural networks and conventional VQA training techniques. The findings aim to stimulate further investigation and discussion within the scientific community regarding the efficacy and applicability of the proposed approach.
AI Summary
The paper studies whether quantum-annealing-based optimization can train variational quantum circuits to classify quantum states as separable or entangled. It applies a previously introduced training framework that discretizes circuit rotation angles, partitions parameter space, and hierarchically refines the search around promising parameter choices. A state-vector mean-squared-error objective is presented as a QUBO for annealing-based optimization. The numerical study uses generated three-qubit pure states, with balanced separable and entangled labels and equal representation of bipartite-entangled, W-type, and GHZ-type examples within the entangled class. Comparisons include SPSA-trained variational circuits and a small feedforward neural network. The annealing-based configuration uses four refinement levels, three partitions per angle, and initially three discretization points per angle; the experimental settings specify 25 executions per model. Reported average training/validation accuracies are approximately $67\%/61\%$ for annealing-based training, $62.5\%/60\%$ for conventional VQA training, and $75\%/65\%$ for the neural network. Reported subclass accuracies are $65\%$ for bipartite entanglement, $60\%$ for GHZ states, and $55\%$ for W states. Training accuracy increases across successive refinement levels. The paper describes these results as preliminary. It acknowledges discretization-induced precision loss and the possibility of missing global minima. Execution-time comparisons remain unevaluated, and an evolutionary-training baseline was not completed because of computational demands. Larger-scale testing and further refinement of the search strategy are left for future work.
Central claim may not hold: The proposed QUBO is not established by the displayed equations, which omit an explicit binary encoding, selection penalties, and any necessary reduction of higher-order circuit-dependent terms. The displayed training objective compares each input state with its image under Q rather than with an entanglement label, admits zero residual for the identity transformation if available, and uses ordinary squares of potentially complex residuals without defining a real-valued encoding. The claimed computational savings from simultaneous annealing evaluation lack a runtime and success-probability analysis, while the experiments do not identify the annealing device or solver and its execution settings. The experimental description misidentifies three-qubit dimensions, and its local-unitary Bell-pair generator excludes partially entangled bipartite pure states, undermining the claimed generalization to all three-qubit states.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Journal reference
- Proceedings - 2025 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Artificial Intelligence, QAI 2025, 27-33
- DOI
- 10.1109/QAI63978.2025.00012
- Comments
- 7 pages, 8 figures