Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.39491

Automated Verification of Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing

Min Lai, Yu-Fang Chen, Shih-Han Hung

cs.PLcs.LOquant-phSubmitted Oct 29, 2026• Announced Oct 30, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first fully automated verification framework for QSP-based Hamiltonian simulation. Our framework exploits the structure of the simulation algorithm: Hamiltonians are given as weighted sums of Pauli strings, embedded into larger unitaries through block encodings, and transformed into time-evolution operators by quantum signal processing (QSP). Using a symbolic Pauli-sum semantics for ancilla-indexed circuit blocks, our verifier proves that the distinguished all-zero ancilla block is proportional to the target Hamiltonian and infers the subnormalization factor automatically. It then verifies the QSP layer by extracting the implemented polynomial transformation and certifying its approximation error. This structure-aware abstraction is essential for scalability. Composing our verified block encoding and QSP wrapper yields an estimated macro-expanded size of about 1.52 million gates. The verifier certifies the block encoding once and checks the QSP layer through its abstract interface, without expanding the oracle calls. Our implementation verifies block encodings of structured Pauli-sum Hamiltonians with up to 256 system qubits and verifies QSP Hamiltonian-simulation instances by extracting their implemented polynomials and checking the resulting approximation bounds. These results show that fully automated verification can handle common Hamiltonian-simulation circuits at substantial scale when it exploits their algorithmic structure.

AI Summary

The paper addresses automated verification that a block-encoding/QSP circuit approximates $e^{-iHt}$ for a Hamiltonian specified as a weighted Pauli sum, without constructing its matrix or supplying a reference circuit. The guarantee concerns the circuit’s principal ancilla block $B$: $\|\beta B-e^{-iHt}\|\leq\epsilon$, allowing an inferred normalization $\beta$ rather than requiring deterministic time evolution. Verification is compositional. Ancilla-indexed symbolic execution tracks Pauli-sum system operators, checks the block encoding, and infers its normalization $\alpha$. The QSP layer then uses a four-block symbolic abstraction of the certified unitary; unitarity-derived rewrites extract its implemented polynomial. Least-squares normalization and residual checks at Chebyshev nodes certify uniform approximation, with grid size $O(|\alpha t|+\log(1/\epsilon)+d)$. Soundness combines polynomial approximation error with $|t|\epsilon_{\mathrm{BE}}$. The implementation uses 60-digit ball arithmetic. The evaluation verifies 50 of 51 structured block encodings within 1,800 seconds, including 256-qubit, 512-term instances. The largest Heisenberg case completes in 4,976 seconds under an extended timeout. All 50 QSP benchmarks pass, reaching degree 77 at effective time 50, verified in approximately three seconds. Composing the largest Ising encoding with that wrapper gives an estimated 1.52-million-gate circuit, excluding additional control-decomposition overhead. Testing also identifies a padding-related block-encoding bug in Cobble. Supported circuit languages restrict ancilla/system interactions and QSP access to nonzero ancilla branches. Symbolic expressions can grow exponentially, and rewriting is incomplete outside standard QSP forms. Oblivious amplitude amplification is not verified.

Little sign of AI-generated textMissing comparison

Error found: The abstract omits that the verified simulation output is a subnormalized ancilla-selected block, with scaling approximately 1/4 in the main benchmarks, rather than an unscaled implementation of time evolution. The polynomial-approximation soundness corollary invokes a theorem with a stricter sampling threshold than the checker uses, although a corrected Chebyshev norming argument validates the implemented threshold.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Related papers

Much Ado about Quantum Signal Processing: Phase-Finding, Application, and Interpretation

Skelton, Shawna Erica Sullivan

Quantum signal processing (QSP) is a template for designing algorithms in the quantum circuit model. We consider three facets of this template. First, how to compute the exact circuit for a given algorithm and problem parameters. QSP requires two interrelated pre-processing steps. We give an algorithm for the first step, and compare its performance to recent alternatives. We find that our algorithm, using the Wilson method, is competitive for sparse polynomials away from the near-coherent regime. Next, we give an algorithm for quantum phase or energy estimation (QPE and QEE), designed with QSP. QEE replaces the common oracle access model in QPE with a block-encoding. We use von Neumann's measurement protocol and Hamiltonian simulation with QSP to show that QEE can be solved efficiently. We then show that when the standard QPE oracle is block-encoded, QPE algorithm with logarithmic overhead. We also show that whenever the system of interest is described by a linear combination of Pauli terms, the gate complexity of the entire algorithm is efficient in Clifford and T gates. We then consider how QSP relates to time-evolution. We show that QSP circuits can be understood as the circuits generated by a piecewise continuous time-evolution. Specifically, this evolution fits the bilinear control model, a common model in quantum control theory. Finally, we engineer a continuous time-dependent system for which the quantum adiabatic theorem will hold, which syntactically resembles QSP. We show that in the high-degree and small-signal limit, when the adiabatic schedule is Lipschitz continuous, the quantum adiabatic evolution of an eigenstate of H(0) is close to a QSP circuit applied to the same eigenstate. Crucially, our formalism establishes a direct functional relationship between the adiabatic schedule and the set of phase factors that determine the QSP circuit.

•Jan 1, 2026•0 citations

Efficient phase-factor evaluation in quantum signal processing

Yulong Dong, Xiang Meng, K. Birgitta Whaley +1 more

Quantum signal processing (QSP) is a powerful quantum algorithm to exactly implement matrix polynomials on quantum computers. Asymptotic analysis of quantum algorithms based on QSP has shown that asymptotically optimal results can in principle be obtained for a range of tasks, such as Hamiltonian simulation and the quantum linear system problem. A further benefit of QSP is that it uses a minimal number of ancilla qubits, which facilitates its implementation on near-to-intermediate term quantum architectures. However, there is so far no classically stable algorithm allowing computation of the phase factors that are needed to build QSP circuits. Existing methods require the use of variable precision arithmetic and can only be applied to polynomials of a relatively low degree. We present here an optimization-based method that can accurately compute the phase factors using standard double precision arithmetic operations. We demonstrate the performance of this approach with applications to Hamiltonian simulation, eigenvalue filtering, and quantum linear system problems. Our numerical results show that the optimization algorithm can find phase factors to accurately approximate polynomials of a degree larger than $10\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}000$ with errors below ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$.

arXiv:2002.11649•Physical Review A•Apr 22, 2021•140 citations

From Block-encoding to Generalized Quantum Signal Processing: Principles, Algorithms and Applications

Tal Gurfinkel, Kaushika De Silva, Anuradha Mahasinghe +9 more

Modern quantum algorithms are increasingly formulated as coherent procedures for implementing polynomial transformations of operators and singular values. This perspective provides a powerful and unifying language for quantum algorithm design, connecting a wide range of distinct problems through five closely related key tools: block-encoding, qubitization, QSP, QSVT and GQSP. Block-encoding embeds non-unitary matrices into larger unitaries; qubitization converts block-encodings into structured operators; QSP, QSVT and GQSP enable polynomial transformations with near-optimal query complexity. Together, these techniques form a general toolkit for transforming matrix functions into implementable quantum circuits. This paper develops these techniques from first principles as a unified framework for constructing quantum algorithms. We apply this framework to representative applications to highlight design principles and demonstrate how distinct algorithms can be constructed from a unified sequence of operator transformations. A central contribution is a systematic decision workflow for selecting the appropriate approach according to the operator structure and the desired transformation polynomial. This perspective clarifies when direct GQSP or through qubitization, or Laurent expansion, or QSVT is most appropriate. We organize algorithmic design into an end-to-end pipeline: identifying the target matrix function, constructing an appropriate block-encoding, determining the relevant spectral domain, designing a polynomial or Laurent-polynomial approximation, synthesizing the phase factors, and translating the transformation into an executable quantum circuit. By applying this unified framework to example applications, we showcase a practical methodology for reasoning, designing, and implementing quantum algorithms based on polynomial transformations.

quant-pharXiv:2609.09977•Sep 10, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Signal Processing for Fault-Tolerant Photonic Computing and Quantum-Enhanced Scientific Intelligence

Murali Krishna Pasupuleti

Abstract: Quantum signal processing (QSP) provides a mathematically economical mechanism for transforming the spectral information of a block-encoded operator through carefully phased single-qubit rotations. Photonic quantum computing, meanwhile, offers high-bandwidth operation, network compatibility and substantial room-temperature functionality, yet remains constrained by optical loss, probabilistic state preparation, finite squeezing, detector imperfections and the resource overhead of logical error correction. This paper develops an integrated analytical framework that connects QSP polynomial synthesis to fault-tolerant photonic execution and to a broader construct termed quantum-enhanced scientific intelligence: the reliable extraction of predictive, explanatory and decision-relevant knowledge from complex scientific operators and data. The study adopts a theory-building and model-based research design. It combines block encoding, QSP and quantum singular-value transformation with open-system dynamics, logical-error modelling, constrained multi-objective optimization and risk-adjusted outcome scoring. The proposed QSP-FTSI framework treats algorithmic approximation error, photonic component quality, decoder performance, logical reliability, resource intensity, uncertainty calibration and scientific utility as coupled rather than independent variables. An illustrative normalized model yields a baseline benefit index of 7.942, a composite risk index of 2.640 and a risk-adjusted score of 6.358 on a ten-point scale; an improved low-loss, high-QEC scenario reaches 7.858, whereas a stressed configuration falls to 3.754. These values are demonstrations, not experimental findings. The principal contribution is a publication-ready mathematical architecture for evaluating when QSP-enabled photonic systems can support scientifically meaningful simulation, inverse modelling, spectral filtering and inference under explicit fault-tolerance and reproducibility constraints. The framework also identifies measurable pathways for experimental validation, hardware–algorithm co-design and responsible scientific deployment. Keywords quantum signal processing; quantum singular-value transformation; fault-tolerant photonic computing; block encoding; Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill codes; fusion-based quantum computation; logical error suppression; Hamiltonian simulation; scientific machine learning; quantum-enhanced inference; photonic integrated circuits; spectral transformation; quantum error correction; risk-adjusted scientific intelligence; hardware–algorithm co-design

International Journal of Academic and Industrial Research Innovations(IJAIRI)•Jul 22, 2026•0 citations

Improved constant factors for qubitized Hamiltonian simulation

Matthew Pocrnic, Danial Motlagh

Quantum signal processing (QSP) serves as the asymptotically optimal technique for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer. By approximating the time evolution operator via the Jacobi-Anger expansion, the Hamiltonian simulation problem reduces to a problem in polynomial approximation theory: find a sufficient degree-$d$ polynomial series to approximate $e^{-iτx}$ on $[-1,1]$ within error $ε$. While $d\in\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(τ)$ is known to be asymptotically optimal, there exists a gap between state-of-the-art bounds and the optimal constant multiplicative factor, which is approximately equal to 1. Here, we close this gap almost entirely, to the point where possible future improvements will not be of practical significance. Our improvement resides in a careful treatment of the Bessel tail in the Jacobi-Anger series using Kapteyn's and Watson's inequalities, thereby reducing the overhead estimates for all Hamiltonian simulation tasks on quantum computers by a factor of $\approx e/2$.

quant-pharXiv:2608.02734•Aug 5, 2026•0 citations

Ensemble-Based Quantum Signal Processing for Error Mitigation

Suying Liu, Yulong Dong, Dong An +1 more

Despite rapid advances in quantum hardware, noise remains a central obstacle to deploying quantum algorithms on near-term devices. In particular, random coherent errors that accumulate during circuit execution constitute a dominant and fundamentally challenging noise source. We introduce a noise-resilient framework for Quantum Signal Processing (QSP) that mitigates such coherent errors without increasing circuit depth or ancillary qubit requirements. Our approach uses ensembles of noisy QSP circuits combined with measurement-level averaging to suppress random phase errors in Z rotations. Building on this framework, we develop robust QSP algorithms for implementing polynomial functions of Hermitian matrices and for estimating observables, with applications to Hamiltonian simulation, quantum linear systems, and ground-state preparation. We analyze the trade-off between approximation error and hardware noise, which is essential for practical implementation under the stringent depth and coherence constraints of current quantum hardware. Our results establish a practical pathway for integrating error mitigation seamlessly into algorithmic design, advancing the development of robust quantum computing, and enabling the discovery of scientific applications with near- and mid-term quantum devices.

quant-pharXiv:2601.20073•Jan 29, 2026•0 citations
We present, to the best of our knowledge, the first fully automated verification framework for QSP-based Hamiltonian simulation. Our framework exploits the structure of the simulation algorithm: Hamiltonians are given as weighted sums of Pauli strings, embedded into larger unitaries through block encodings, and transformed into time-evolution operators by quantum signal processing (QSP). Using a symbolic Pauli-sum semantics for ancilla-indexed circuit blocks, our verifier proves that the distinguished all-zero ancilla block is proportional to the target Hamiltonian and infers the subnormalization factor automatically. It then verifies the QSP layer by extracting the implemented polynomial transformation and certifying its approximation error. This structure-aware abstraction is essential for scalability. Composing our verified block encoding and QSP wrapper yields an estimated macro-expanded size of about 1.52 million gates. The verifier certifies the block encoding once and checks the QSP layer through its abstract interface, without expanding the oracle calls. Our implementation verifies block encodings of structured Pauli-sum Hamiltonians with up to 256 system qubits and verifies QSP Hamiltonian-simulation instances by extracting their implemented polynomials and checking the resulting approximation bounds. These results show that fully automated verification can handle common Hamiltonian-simulation circuits at substantial scale when it exploits their algorithmic structure.
The paper addresses automated verification that a block-encoding/QSP circuit approximates e−iHte^{-iHt}e−iHt for a Hamiltonian specified as a weighted Pauli sum, without constructing its matrix or supplying a reference circuit. The guarantee concerns the circuit’s principal ancilla block BBB: ∥βB−e−iHt∥≤ϵ\|\beta B-e^{-iHt}\|\leq\epsilon∥βB−e−iHt∥≤ϵ, allowing an inferred normalization β\betaβ rather than requiring deterministic time evolution.
Verification is compositional. Ancilla-indexed symbolic execution tracks Pauli-sum system operators, checks the block encoding, and infers its normalization α\alphaα. The QSP layer then uses a four-block symbolic abstraction of the certified unitary; unitarity-derived rewrites extract its implemented polynomial. Least-squares normalization and residual checks at Chebyshev nodes certify uniform approximation, with grid size O(∣αt∣+log⁡(1/ϵ)+d)O(|\alpha t|+\log(1/\epsilon)+d)O(∣αt∣+log(1/ϵ)+d). Soundness combines polynomial approximation error with ∣t∣ϵBE|t|\epsilon_{\mathrm{BE}}∣t∣ϵBE​. The implementation uses 60-digit ball arithmetic.
The evaluation verifies 50 of 51 structured block encodings within 1,800 seconds, including 256-qubit, 512-term instances. The largest Heisenberg case completes in 4,976 seconds under an extended timeout. All 50 QSP benchmarks pass, reaching degree 77 at effective time 50, verified in approximately three seconds. Composing the largest Ising encoding with that wrapper gives an estimated 1.52-million-gate circuit, excluding additional control-decomposition overhead. Testing also identifies a padding-related block-encoding bug in Cobble.
Supported circuit languages restrict ancilla/system interactions and QSP access to nonzero ancilla branches. Symbolic expressions can grow exponentially, and rewriting is incomplete outside standard QSP forms. Oblivious amplitude amplification is not verified.
Quantum signal processing (QSP) is a template for designing algorithms in the quantum circuit model. We consider three facets of this template. First, how to compute the exact circuit for a given algorithm and problem parameters. QSP requires two interrelated pre-processing steps. We give an algorithm for the first step, and compare its performance to recent alternatives. We find that our algorithm, using the Wilson method, is competitive for sparse polynomials away from the near-coherent regime. Next, we give an algorithm for quantum phase or energy estimation (QPE and QEE), designed with QSP. QEE replaces the common oracle access model in QPE with a block-encoding. We use von Neumann's measurement protocol and Hamiltonian simulation with QSP to show that QEE can be solved efficiently. We then show that when the standard QPE oracle is block-encoded, QPE algorithm with logarithmic overhead. We also show that whenever the system of interest is described by a linear combination of Pauli terms, the gate complexity of the entire algorithm is efficient in Clifford and T gates. We then consider how QSP relates to time-evolution. We show that QSP circuits can be understood as the circuits generated by a piecewise continuous time-evolution. Specifically, this evolution fits the bilinear control model, a common model in quantum control theory. Finally, we engineer a continuous time-dependent system for which the quantum adiabatic theorem will hold, which syntactically resembles QSP. We show that in the high-degree and small-signal limit, when the adiabatic schedule is Lipschitz continuous, the quantum adiabatic evolution of an eigenstate of H(0) is close to a QSP circuit applied to the same eigenstate. Crucially, our formalism establishes a direct functional relationship between the adiabatic schedule and the set of phase factors that determine the QSP circuit.
Quantum signal processing (QSP) is a powerful quantum algorithm to exactly implement matrix polynomials on quantum computers. Asymptotic analysis of quantum algorithms based on QSP has shown that asymptotically optimal results can in principle be obtained for a range of tasks, such as Hamiltonian simulation and the quantum linear system problem. A further benefit of QSP is that it uses a minimal number of ancilla qubits, which facilitates its implementation on near-to-intermediate term quantum architectures. However, there is so far no classically stable algorithm allowing computation of the phase factors that are needed to build QSP circuits. Existing methods require the use of variable precision arithmetic and can only be applied to polynomials of a relatively low degree. We present here an optimization-based method that can accurately compute the phase factors using standard double precision arithmetic operations. We demonstrate the performance of this approach with applications to Hamiltonian simulation, eigenvalue filtering, and quantum linear system problems. Our numerical results show that the optimization algorithm can find phase factors to accurately approximate polynomials of a degree larger than 1000010\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}00010000 with errors below ${10}^{\ensuremath{-}12}$.
Modern quantum algorithms are increasingly formulated as coherent procedures for implementing polynomial transformations of operators and singular values. This perspective provides a powerful and unifying language for quantum algorithm design, connecting a wide range of distinct problems through five closely related key tools: block-encoding, qubitization, QSP, QSVT and GQSP. Block-encoding embeds non-unitary matrices into larger unitaries; qubitization converts block-encodings into structured operators; QSP, QSVT and GQSP enable polynomial transformations with near-optimal query complexity. Together, these techniques form a general toolkit for transforming matrix functions into implementable quantum circuits. This paper develops these techniques from first principles as a unified framework for constructing quantum algorithms. We apply this framework to representative applications to highlight design principles and demonstrate how distinct algorithms can be constructed from a unified sequence of operator transformations. A central contribution is a systematic decision workflow for selecting the appropriate approach according to the operator structure and the desired transformation polynomial. This perspective clarifies when direct GQSP or through qubitization, or Laurent expansion, or QSVT is most appropriate. We organize algorithmic design into an end-to-end pipeline: identifying the target matrix function, constructing an appropriate block-encoding, determining the relevant spectral domain, designing a polynomial or Laurent-polynomial approximation, synthesizing the phase factors, and translating the transformation into an executable quantum circuit. By applying this unified framework to example applications, we showcase a practical methodology for reasoning, designing, and implementing quantum algorithms based on polynomial transformations.
Abstract: Quantum signal processing (QSP) provides a mathematically economical mechanism for transforming the spectral information of a block-encoded operator through carefully phased single-qubit rotations. Photonic quantum computing, meanwhile, offers high-bandwidth operation, network compatibility and substantial room-temperature functionality, yet remains constrained by optical loss, probabilistic state preparation, finite squeezing, detector imperfections and the resource overhead of logical error correction. This paper develops an integrated analytical framework that connects QSP polynomial synthesis to fault-tolerant photonic execution and to a broader construct termed quantum-enhanced scientific intelligence: the reliable extraction of predictive, explanatory and decision-relevant knowledge from complex scientific operators and data. The study adopts a theory-building and model-based research design. It combines block encoding, QSP and quantum singular-value transformation with open-system dynamics, logical-error modelling, constrained multi-objective optimization and risk-adjusted outcome scoring. The proposed QSP-FTSI framework treats algorithmic approximation error, photonic component quality, decoder performance, logical reliability, resource intensity, uncertainty calibration and scientific utility as coupled rather than independent variables. An illustrative normalized model yields a baseline benefit index of 7.942, a composite risk index of 2.640 and a risk-adjusted score of 6.358 on a ten-point scale; an improved low-loss, high-QEC scenario reaches 7.858, whereas a stressed configuration falls to 3.754. These values are demonstrations, not experimental findings. The principal contribution is a publication-ready mathematical architecture for evaluating when QSP-enabled photonic systems can support scientifically meaningful simulation, inverse modelling, spectral filtering and inference under explicit fault-tolerance and reproducibility constraints. The framework also identifies measurable pathways for experimental validation, hardware–algorithm co-design and responsible scientific deployment. Keywords quantum signal processing; quantum singular-value transformation; fault-tolerant photonic computing; block encoding; Gottesman–Kitaev–Preskill codes; fusion-based quantum computation; logical error suppression; Hamiltonian simulation; scientific machine learning; quantum-enhanced inference; photonic integrated circuits; spectral transformation; quantum error correction; risk-adjusted scientific intelligence; hardware–algorithm co-design
Quantum signal processing (QSP) serves as the asymptotically optimal technique for Hamiltonian simulation on a quantum computer. By approximating the time evolution operator via the Jacobi-Anger expansion, the Hamiltonian simulation problem reduces to a problem in polynomial approximation theory: find a sufficient degree-ddd polynomial series to approximate e−iτxe^{-iτx}e−iτx on [−1,1][-1,1][−1,1] within error εεε. While d∈O~(τ)d\in\tilde{\mathcal{O}}(τ)d∈O~(τ) is known to be asymptotically optimal, there exists a gap between state-of-the-art bounds and the optimal constant multiplicative factor, which is approximately equal to 1. Here, we close this gap almost entirely, to the point where possible future improvements will not be of practical significance. Our improvement resides in a careful treatment of the Bessel tail in the Jacobi-Anger series using Kapteyn's and Watson's inequalities, thereby reducing the overhead estimates for all Hamiltonian simulation tasks on quantum computers by a factor of ≈e/2\approx e/2≈e/2.
Despite rapid advances in quantum hardware, noise remains a central obstacle to deploying quantum algorithms on near-term devices. In particular, random coherent errors that accumulate during circuit execution constitute a dominant and fundamentally challenging noise source. We introduce a noise-resilient framework for Quantum Signal Processing (QSP) that mitigates such coherent errors without increasing circuit depth or ancillary qubit requirements. Our approach uses ensembles of noisy QSP circuits combined with measurement-level averaging to suppress random phase errors in Z rotations. Building on this framework, we develop robust QSP algorithms for implementing polynomial functions of Hermitian matrices and for estimating observables, with applications to Hamiltonian simulation, quantum linear systems, and ground-state preparation. We analyze the trade-off between approximation error and hardware noise, which is essential for practical implementation under the stringent depth and coherence constraints of current quantum hardware. Our results establish a practical pathway for integrating error mitigation seamlessly into algorithmic design, advancing the development of robust quantum computing, and enabling the discovery of scientific applications with near- and mid-term quantum devices.