arXiv:2610.38780
An Eigenvector-Continued Green's Function Method
Stefano Brolli, Carlo Barbieri
Abstract
Emulating the Green's function using reduced-order equations is challenging because of the amount of information it contains. This information includes the one-particle spectroscopy over the entire energy spectrum, the one-body density matrix, and the ground-state energy. Nevertheless, the computational speedup offered by emulators is essential for applications requiring repeated model evaluations, which are ubiquitous in many-body physics. These include parameter calibration, uncertainty quantification, phase-diagram mapping, and geometry optimization. In this Letter, we introduce a systematically improvable emulator based on eigenvector continuation and moment-matching. The resulting approximation, which we refer to as an ``eigenvector-continued Green's function,'' can be obtained by solving linear equations, enabling an efficient separation of the computational workload into offline and online stages.
AI Summary
The paper addresses reduced-order emulation of many-body Green’s functions for applications requiring repeated model evaluations, including parameter calibration, uncertainty quantification, phase-diagram mapping, and geometry optimization. The challenge is to reduce computational cost while representing the information encoded in the Green’s function: one-particle spectroscopy across the energy spectrum, the one-body density matrix, and the ground-state energy. It introduces an approximation termed an “eigenvector-continued Green’s function,” combining eigenvector continuation with moment matching. The stated result is a systematically improvable emulator whose evaluation can be formulated through linear equations. This formulation permits separation into an offline stage and an online stage, with the intended benefit of making repeated evaluations less expensive. The abstract does not specify the reduced-space construction, which moments are matched, or how the approximation is enlarged to improve accuracy. Only the title and abstract are available, so the evidence establishing accuracy and efficiency cannot be assessed here. No benchmark systems, numerical errors, speedup factors, computational scaling, or convergence bounds are reported in the abstract. It also gives no explicit limitations or conditions under which the method remains accurate. In particular, the available material does not establish how accurately the emulator reproduces each of the spectral and ground-state quantities motivating its construction.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the abstract only. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 5 pages, 4 figures