arXiv:2610.37491
Adaptive Information Mining: Approaching the Quantum Limit of Super-Resolution Imaging
Seungman Choi, Peter Menart, Andrew Schramka, Zubin Jacob
Abstract
The "Rayleigh limit" is not an intrinsic property of light, but a consequence of sub-optimal measurement of collected photons by the imaging instrument. To overcome this limitation, we present Adaptive Information Mining, a framework that achieves super-resolution by using sequentially refined measurements for incoming photons. Our approach employs a reconfigurable imaging system that dynamically reshapes the instrument measurement responses to maximize the Fisher information and guide scene estimation toward the fundamental quantum limit, even in deep sub-Rayleigh regimes. We demonstrate that this approach achieves an estimation error 2-5 times closer to the fundamental quantum limit than traditional direct imaging when imaging point sources, without requiring any prior knowledge of their positions and brightnesses. Importantly, we demonstrate that AIM can be extended to fully blind multi-parameter estimation in scenarios involving an unknown number of sources or turbulence-induced wavefront distortions. Our approach addresses the limitations of conventional fixed imaging, offering a practical path toward quantum-limited super-resolution imaging.
AI Summary
The paper studies adaptive receiver-side measurements for estimating positions and brightnesses of incoherent point sources below the Rayleigh scale, without knowing those parameters beforehand. Adaptive Information Mining (AIM) alternates maximum-likelihood scene estimation from accumulated Poisson photon counts with numerical optimization of spatial-light-modulator (SLM) phases. Two SLMs reshape the detected intensity response; measurement design maximizes the Fisher-information determinant, or minimizes a target parameter’s marginalized Cramér–Rao bound. Evidence consists of optical forward-model simulations and Monte Carlo estimation, rather than an experiment. For three sources with brightness ratio $1:5:20$, five measurements sharing 14,000 photons yield position and brightness errors reported as approximately $2$–$3$ times closer to the quantum bound than direct imaging, including separations down to $0.3R$. This factor measures reduction in the gap above the quantum bound, not absolute error reduction. Targeting separation for two sources with brightness ratio $1:15$ gives an approximately fivefold gap reduction while jointly estimating nuisance parameters. These results use 50 trials per condition. A turbulence extension jointly estimates the scene and wavefront. With $D/r_0=8$, $10^6$ photons and 12 measurements, simulations give approximately $0.2$ rad wavefront error and scene errors below diffraction-limited direct-imaging bounds. Turbulence is assumed frozen throughout acquisition; its estimation uses total-variation regularization, while reported scene CRLBs exclude wavefront uncertainty. Real-time operation requires sufficiently fast hardware and computation. The quantum benchmark assumes multiparameter weak commutativity; the paper notes that attaining it may require collective measurements. Unknown-source-count results are deferred to supplementary material.
Error found: The advertised numerical improvement is quantified explicitly using gaps between precision bounds, rather than a reported calculation from empirical estimation errors. Unknown-source-count estimation cannot be independently assessed from the supplied text because its procedures and quantitative evidence are deferred to an unavailable supplement. The turbulence demonstration assumes a frozen, regularized wavefront, and its reported scene-only CRLB does not account for the information penalty from jointly estimating the unknown wavefront.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- Main: 13 pages, 8 figures; Supplement: 15 pages, 11 figures