arXiv:2610.36700
Ancestor Lifting of Quasi-Cyclic Additive Codes and Certified Quantum Codes
Liangdong Lu, Ran Xu, Ruipan Yang, Qiang Fu
Abstract
Additive codes over $\Ffour$ that are self-orthogonal under the trace inner product correspond to binary quantum stabilizer codes. We study 1-generator $(1,2)$-quasi-cyclic (QC) additive codes and their exact quantum distances. For composite lengths $n=\ell m$, an ancestor-lifting theorem transports dual words of the folded ancestor to the length-$n$ code. A two-layer decomposition for $\ell=2$ and a CRT splitting for odd $\ell$ yield dimension laws and explain equality, escape, and mixed-branch behavior in the certified examples. A palindromic criterion ensures symplectic self-orthogonality, while reversal pairing and a symplectic Gram rank formula describe broader construction families. Exact distances are established by information-set decoding screening, Brouwer--Zimmermann computation on the additive dual, and independent witness verification. We certify twenty-one record-breaking binary quantum codes across twenty entries of Grassl's code table, with twenty-eight certified members in total. Propagation improves thirty-four further entries, and explicit constructions are supplied for three table-tying GV entries marked Code Missing Construction. Six additional candidates are reported only with rigorous upper bounds and heuristic screening evidence. The results connect divisor-lattice structure in additive quasi-cyclic codes with reproducible certification of exact quantum distances.
AI Summary
The paper studies how divisor structure constrains distances of binary stabilizer codes constructed from one-generator quasi-cyclic additive codes over $\mathbb F_4$, and how to certify improvements to finite-length code tables. For $n=\ell m$, an ancestor-lifting theorem maps trace-symplectic dual words of the length-$m$ folded code into the length-$n$ dual, multiplying symplectic weight by $\ell$. This gives quantum-distance upper bounds when lifted words lie outside the stabilizer. For $\ell=2$, a two-layer decomposition introduces a linear compatibility obstruction and expresses distance through affine-coset minimization; for odd $\ell$, CRT gives independent layers. These structures distinguish distances attained by periodic lifts from those attained by nonperiodic words. Additional results include a sufficient palindromic self-orthogonality criterion, dual decompositions, and a circulant Gram-rank formula. The computational results comprise 21 certified record-breaking codes across 20 Grassl-table entries, with 28 directly certified members overall. Nineteen entries improve by one and $[[60,13,12]]_2$ improves its entry by two. Examples include $[[73,10,15]]_2$, $[[91,15,17]]_2$, and $[[93,16,17]]_2$. Standard propagation gives 34 further reported improvements and explicit constructions for three table-tying entries previously lacking constructions. Certification combines heuristic information-set-decoding screening, exact Brouwer–Zimmermann minimum-weight computation on the additive dual, and independently checked logical witnesses; the longest primary computation takes approximately $2.0\times10^6$ CPU seconds. Six additional candidates lack certified lower bounds. General lift-saturation and defect-spectrum claims remain conjectural, and the distance formulas still require minimization. Verification artifacts are available on request.
Error found: The claimed 34 further improved table entries include the directly improved (93,15) entry, so the propagation table establishes only 33 additional distinct entries. Proposition 'orderbound' falsely claims that every unit of order t>1 has vanishing geometric sum: in F_2[x]/(x^3-1), c=x has order 3 but 1+c+c^2 is nonzero.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.