arXiv:2610.35735
Decoding with alternating weighted graph sparsification for quantum low-density parity-check codes
Josu Etxezarreta Martinez, Francisco Garcia-Herrero, Ruben M. Otxoa, Reza Dastbasteh
Abstract
Real-time decoding is a fundamental necessity for building fault-tolerant quantum computers. In this work, we introduce decoding with alternating weighted graph sparsification (DAWG), an ensemble based approach that combines Tanner graph sparsification with ensembling belief-propagation (BP) decoders. The DAWG decoder runs BP decoders over the full detector error model Tanner graph for certain iterations to then transfer the posteriors to a sparsified graph in which additional rounds of BP are run. Each of the decoders in the ensemble uses a different transfer matrix to map the posterior information to the sparsified graph. We use the serial schedule for the minimum-sum BP decoders and, thus, employ Vibe decoding ideas by randomizing the schedules of each of them. The performance of the DAWG decoder is then numerically studied for bivariate bicycle codes and superdense color code circuits to be compared with other state-of-the-art decoding approaches. Importantly, the DAWG decoder shows a similar performance to Relay belief-propagation and Vibe decoding when combined with an order-$0$ Localized Statistics Decoding (LSD-$0$) post-processor. Crucially, the post-processor is called an order of magnitude less times than for Vibe with the same ensemble size, indicating that the introduced latency tail will be minimal. Furthermore, LSD-$0$ operates on a sparsified decoding graph of a fraction of the size of the full detector error model, which simplifies the resources required by specialized hardware to support it. Overall, the DAWG+LSD-$0$ decoder represents a viable low-cost BP-based decoding algorithm for quantum error correction codes.
AI Summary
The paper addresses circuit-level decoding of qLDPC codes, focusing on reducing belief-propagation (BP) failures and reliance on slower post-processing. Decoding with alternating weighted graph sparsification (DAWG) runs an ensemble of randomized serial BP decoders on the full detector error model (DEM), transfers unconverged posterior information to a sparsified DEM using different transfer matrices, and runs further BP iterations. Remaining failures are processed by order-zero localized statistics decoding (LSD-$0$) on the sparsified graph. Monte Carlo simulations under circuit-level depolarizing noise cover three bivariate bicycle codes through $[[144,12,12]]$ and superdense color-code circuits with distances $3,5,7,9$. With 20 total BP iterations and ensembles of 5–20 decoders, DAWG+LSD-$0$ matches reported RelayBP logical-error performance for the Gross code using uncorrelated DEMs, and reported Vibe+LSD-$0$ performance for color codes using correlated DEMs. For color codes, DAWG uses at most 15 ensemble members versus 32 in the reported Vibe results. At matched ensemble sizes and iteration counts, post-processing is invoked up to an order of magnitude less often than with Vibe. Sparsified graphs retain roughly 10–31% of full-DEM variable nodes. Architecture-based estimates, rather than a hardware demonstration, predict 7–40-fold lower worst-case latency than full-DEM BP+OSD-$0$. Stated limitations include transfer matrices found through restricted exhaustive search, unoptimized hardware and deterministic schedules, and untested decoding of logical operations. Efficient transfer-matrix generation, sparsified-model selection, and scalability to larger codes remain open implementation questions.
Error found: Reduced post-processor invocation frequency and architectural latency estimates support potential latency improvements, but do not establish the abstract's claim of minimal end-to-end latency tails. The reported order-of-magnitude reduction in post-processing calls is supported for selected codes and low-error regimes, not as an unqualified property of DAWG. The BB sparsified graphs contain approximately 11.3%, 31.4%, and 31.1% of the original variable nodes, rather than uniformly containing 25%. The latency table implies worst-case speedups of approximately 3.76–32.76 over full-DEM BP+OSD-0, contradicting the stated 7–40-fold range.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 13 pages, 5 figures