Bell nonlocality places the long-standing philosophical disputes over the nature of quantum theory on a mathematically rigorous, experimentally testable footing, positioning quantum mechanics between local realism and the most general no-signaling theories. Yet the precise quantum boundary has remained elusive even in the minimal Bell scenario, where the extreme points generating the set are known. Here we characterize this boundary through a computable necessary and sufficient criterion: a correlation is quantum if and only if it can be decomposed into an extreme quantum correlation and a classical correlation. The criterion follows from our proof that every Bell functional exhibiting quantum advantage admits a unique quantum maximizer. We further classify the finitely many maximal-face structures containing each nonlocal exposed point according to their local deterministic vertices. By sharply distinguishing physically realizable correlations from nonphysical ones, these results resolve a long-standing open problem and provide a new foundation for identifying the principles underlying quantum theory and determining the ultimate information-theoretic limits of quantum correlations.
Bell nonlocality places the long-standing philosophical disputes over the nature of quantum theory on a mathematically rigorous, experimentally testable footing, positioning quantum mechanics between local realism and the most general no-signaling theories. Yet the precise quantum boundary has remained elusive even in the minimal Bell scenario, where the extreme points generating the set are known. Here we characterize this boundary through a computable necessary and sufficient criterion: a correlation is quantum if and only if it can be decomposed into an extreme quantum correlation and a classical correlation. The criterion follows from our proof that every Bell functional exhibiting quantum advantage admits a unique quantum maximizer. We further classify the finitely many maximal-face structures containing each nonlocal exposed point according to their local deterministic vertices. By sharply distinguishing physically realizable correlations from nonphysical ones, these results resolve a long-standing open problem and provide a new foundation for identifying the principles underlying quantum theory and determining the ultimate information-theoretic limits of quantum correlations.
In device-independent quantum information, correlations between local measurement outcomes observed by spatially separated parties in a Bell test play a fundamental role. Even though it is long-known that the set of correlations allowed in quantum theory lies strictly between the Bell-local set and the no-signaling set, many questions concerning the geometry of the quantum set remain unanswered. Here, we revisit the problem of when the boundary of the quantum set coincides with the no-signaling set in the simplest Bell scenario. In particular, for each Class of these common boundaries containing k zero probabilities, we provide a (5−k) -parameter family of quantum strategies realizing these (extremal) correlations. We further prove that self-testing is possible in all nontrivial Classes beyond the known examples of Hardy-type correlations, and provide numerical evidence supporting the robustness of these self-testing results. Candidates of one-parameter families of self-testing correlations from some of these Classes are identified. As a byproduct of our investigation, if the qubit strategies leading to an extremal nonlocal correlation are local-unitarily equivalent, a self-testing statement provably follows. Interestingly, all these self-testing correlations found on the no-signaling boundary are provably non-exposed. An analogous characterization for the set M of quantum correlations arising from finite-dimensional maximally entangled states is also provided. En route to establishing this last result, we show that all correlations of M in the simplest Bell scenario are attainable as convex combinations of those achievable using a Bell pair and projective measurements. In turn, we obtain the maximal Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Bell inequality violation by any maximally entangled two-qudit state and a no-go theorem regarding the self-testing of such states.
Extremal non-signaling (ENS) boxes are correlations that correspond to vertices of the non-signaling polytope of a Bell scenario. Neither quantum theory nor any theory for ideal measurements allows for ENS boxes. That is, according to quantum theory, ENS boxes are nonphysical. Still, ENS boxes are crucial for addressing a number of problems in Bell nonlocality. Here, we obtain ENS boxes in arbitrary bipartite Bell scenarios and present the complete list of ENS boxes for several unexplored scenarios. Equipped with the boxes, we revisit several foundational questions. We find that already two copies of any ENS box violate the exclusivity (or local orthogonality) and Specker's principles. We provide the minimal decomposition of the magic square correlation - the simplest known perfect correlation in nature - in terms of ENS boxes. We identify the minimal scenario in which a dit of communication (with d < 6) is insufficient to simulate ENS boxes. Our results show that the ENS boxes approach leads to new results and opens new avenues for research.
In a Bell test, the set of observed probability distributions complying with the principle of local realism is fully characterized by Bell inequalities. Quantum theory allows for a violation of these inequalities, which is famously regarded as Bell nonlocality. However, finding the maximal degree of this violation is, in general, an undecidable problem. Consequently, no algorithm can be used to derive quantum analogs of Bell inequalities, which would characterize the set of probability distributions allowed by quantum theory. Here we present a family of inequalities, which approximate the set of quantum correlations in Bell scenarios where the number of settings or outcomes can be arbitrary. We derive these inequalities from the principle of Information Causality, and thus, we do not assume the formalism of quantum mechanics. Moreover, we identify a subspace in the correlation space for which the derived inequalities give the necessary and sufficient conditions for the principle of Macroscopic Locality. As a result, we show that in this subspace, the principle of Information Causality is strictly stronger than the principle of Macroscopic Locality.
In the minimal scenario of quantum correlations, two parties can choose from two observables with two possible outcomes each. Probabilities are specified by four marginals and four correlations. The resulting four-dimensional convex body of correlations, denoted Q , is fundamental for quantum information theory. We review and systematize what is known about Q , and add many details, visualizations, and complete proofs. In particular, we provide a detailed description of the boundary, which consists of three-dimensional faces isomorphic to elliptopes and sextic algebraic manifolds of exposed extreme points. These patches are separated by cubic surfaces of non-exposed extreme points. We provide a trigonometric parametrization of all extreme points, along with their exposing Tsirelson inequalities and quantum models. All non-classical extreme points (exposed or not) are self-testing, i.e., realized by an essentially unique quantum model.Two principles, which are specific to the minimal scenario, allow a quick and complete overview: The first is the pushout transformation, i.e., the application of the sine function to each coordinate. This transforms the classical correlation polytope exactly into the correlation body Q , also identifying the boundary structures. The second principle, self-duality, is an isomorphism between Q and its polar dual, i.e., the set of affine inequalities satisfied by all quantum correlations (“Tsirelson inequalities''). The same isomorphism links the polytope of classical correlations contained in Q to the polytope of no-signalling correlations, which contains Q .We also discuss the sets of correlations achieved with fixed Hilbert space dimension, fixed state or fixed observables, and establish a new non-linear inequality for Q involving the determinant of the correlation matrix.
Information causality (IC) was introduced as a physical principle constraining correlations in non-signaling theories. Whether it can recover the exact quantum correlation boundary, beyond Uffink's inequality, has remained an open question. Here, we combine its generalized formulation for correlated inputs with a new communication protocol to derive quantum Bell inequalities that exactly characterize the quantum correlations in the simplest bipartite Bell scenario, with two binary measurements. In particular, we derive the Tsirelson-Landau-Masanes criterion directly from IC. Thus, the generalized IC implies macroscopic locality, while we also present macroscopically local correlations that violate the generalized IC. This establishes that generalized IC is a strictly stronger principle in this scenario. Together with our earlier result that generalized IC implies a nontrivial communication complexity principle, these findings strengthen the role of information causality in explaining the limits of quantum nonlocality and provide a systematic route to deriving tighter bounds on the set of quantum correlations in more general Bell scenarios.
Understanding the quantitative relation between entanglement and Bell nonlocality is a long-standing open problem of fundamental and practical interest. Here, we tackle this problem in a general Bell scenario. We observe that lying in the center of quantifying these properties are two minimal distances: one from a state to separable states (entanglement), and the other from a correlation to local correlations (nonlocality). We find that these two distances can be related to each other—the minimal correlation distance provides a lower bound for the minimal state distance, which allows us to derive nontrivial bounds on many entanglement measures with an arbitrary nonlocal correlation. Moreover, with the on-hand structural knowledge of entanglement and nonlocality in the ( n , 2, 2) Bell scenario, we refine our estimate significantly.