arXiv:2610.33607
Krylov geometry and optimal recovery under uncertain coherent noise
Abhishek Chowdhury
Abstract
Recovery from a coherent rotation with an unobserved angle depends on both the encoding and what calibration reveals about the noise. We determine their combined limit for a known finite-dimensional generator and one final recovery. Two polynomial projections organize the answer. A physical Krylov chain separates correctable error amplitudes from their first state-dependent distortion; projection onto lower-angle powers identifies the part that a coherent decoder can cancel. Under explicit rank and moment conditions, their combination gives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity at weak noise and a recovery attaining it for any finite logical dimension. The optimal worst-input error lies between one and $d$ times that infidelity at leading order, for logical dimension $d$. When the angle distribution is unknown, we optimize one decoder for every distribution compatible with the calibration. When spectral and calibration frequencies are integer multiples of a common frequency, moment positivity turns this into an exact finite optimization. Small measured means can still allow rare finite rotations. If the sole calibration datum is $β_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(θ/2)]$, with $θ$ the wrapped rotation phase at that common frequency, the optimal worst-prior infidelity is $O(β_r)$ exactly when generator powers through degree $r-1$ are correctable. When the first uncorrectable power has degree $m<r$, the optimal loss scales as $β_r^{m/r}$, with a sharp coefficient fixed by a universal moment problem. In a loss-free four-photon memory, population measurements at two calibration durations retain the fully informed quartic error coefficient for a fixed symmetric narrow-noise family with positive variance and finite fourth moment; a single duration permits loss quadratic in the noise width.
AI Summary
The paper studies a fixed finite-dimensional quantum encoding exposed to $e^{-i\sigma xH}$, with known $H$ but unobserved random angle, followed by one deterministic recovery. It asks how encoding geometry and incomplete calibration jointly limit recovery fidelity. For a nondegenerate prefix correcting $I,H,\ldots,H^L$, it derives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity, $1-F_{e,\mathrm{opt}}=g_L^2h_m\mathcal V\sigma^{2m}/(m!)^2+o(\sigma^{2m})$, where $m=L+1$. Physical block-Krylov orthogonalization determines propagation $g_L$ and logical boundary distortion $\mathcal V$; projection of $x^m$ onto lower angle powers determines residual variance $h_m$. A coherently adjusted, polar-aligned recovery attains the coefficient, with a converse covering all CPTP recoveries. After a known logical rotation is removed, optimal half-diamond error lies between one and $d$ times optimal entanglement infidelity at leading order. Petz recovery doubles the occupied-shell contribution but retains the optimal leakage contribution. For uncertain priors, a minimax polynomial selects one common decoder. Commensurate spectral and calibration frequencies permit exact finite moment optimization. With sole datum $\beta_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(\theta/2)]$, worst-prior infidelity is $O(\beta_r)$ exactly when powers through $r-1$ are correctable; a first defective power $m<r$ instead gives $\beta_r^{m/r}$ scaling under additional boundary hypotheses. In a loss-free four-photon example, two calibration durations retain the informed quartic coefficient, whereas one permits quadratic loss. The local theorem requires rank and moment conditions; uniform guarantees require tail control. The model excludes independently fluctuating or noncommuting generators and control during storage. Optical recovery implementability and photon loss remain unresolved.
The author acknowledges the use of the free versions of ChatGPT (GPT-5 series) and Claude (Claude 5 series) for assistance with organizing the literature, secondary numerical cross-checking, and LaTeX formatting.
Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.
- Comments
- 72 pages including appendices, 5 figures