Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.33607

Krylov geometry and optimal recovery under uncertain coherent noise

Abhishek Chowdhury

quant-phhep-thmath-phphysics.opticsSubmitted Oct 24, 2026• Announced Oct 27, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recovery from a coherent rotation with an unobserved angle depends on both the encoding and what calibration reveals about the noise. We determine their combined limit for a known finite-dimensional generator and one final recovery. Two polynomial projections organize the answer. A physical Krylov chain separates correctable error amplitudes from their first state-dependent distortion; projection onto lower-angle powers identifies the part that a coherent decoder can cancel. Under explicit rank and moment conditions, their combination gives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity at weak noise and a recovery attaining it for any finite logical dimension. The optimal worst-input error lies between one and $d$ times that infidelity at leading order, for logical dimension $d$. When the angle distribution is unknown, we optimize one decoder for every distribution compatible with the calibration. When spectral and calibration frequencies are integer multiples of a common frequency, moment positivity turns this into an exact finite optimization. Small measured means can still allow rare finite rotations. If the sole calibration datum is $β_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(θ/2)]$, with $θ$ the wrapped rotation phase at that common frequency, the optimal worst-prior infidelity is $O(β_r)$ exactly when generator powers through degree $r-1$ are correctable. When the first uncorrectable power has degree $m<r$, the optimal loss scales as $β_r^{m/r}$, with a sharp coefficient fixed by a universal moment problem. In a loss-free four-photon memory, population measurements at two calibration durations retain the fully informed quartic error coefficient for a fixed symmetric narrow-noise family with positive variance and finite fourth moment; a single duration permits loss quadratic in the noise width.

AI Summary

The paper studies a fixed finite-dimensional quantum encoding exposed to $e^{-i\sigma xH}$, with known $H$ but unobserved random angle, followed by one deterministic recovery. It asks how encoding geometry and incomplete calibration jointly limit recovery fidelity. For a nondegenerate prefix correcting $I,H,\ldots,H^L$, it derives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity, $1-F_{e,\mathrm{opt}}=g_L^2h_m\mathcal V\sigma^{2m}/(m!)^2+o(\sigma^{2m})$, where $m=L+1$. Physical block-Krylov orthogonalization determines propagation $g_L$ and logical boundary distortion $\mathcal V$; projection of $x^m$ onto lower angle powers determines residual variance $h_m$. A coherently adjusted, polar-aligned recovery attains the coefficient, with a converse covering all CPTP recoveries. After a known logical rotation is removed, optimal half-diamond error lies between one and $d$ times optimal entanglement infidelity at leading order. Petz recovery doubles the occupied-shell contribution but retains the optimal leakage contribution. For uncertain priors, a minimax polynomial selects one common decoder. Commensurate spectral and calibration frequencies permit exact finite moment optimization. With sole datum $\beta_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(\theta/2)]$, worst-prior infidelity is $O(\beta_r)$ exactly when powers through $r-1$ are correctable; a first defective power $m<r$ instead gives $\beta_r^{m/r}$ scaling under additional boundary hypotheses. In a loss-free four-photon example, two calibration durations retain the informed quartic coefficient, whereas one permits quadratic loss. The local theorem requires rank and moment conditions; uniform guarantees require tail control. The model excludes independently fluctuating or noncommuting generators and control during storage. Optical recovery implementability and photon loss remain unresolved.

Little sign of AI-generated textAI use disclosedStrong assumptions
The author acknowledges the use of the free versions of ChatGPT (GPT-5 series) and Claude (Claude 5 series) for assistance with organizing the literature, secondary numerical cross-checking, and LaTeX formatting.

Written by gpt-6.1-sol from the paper's full text. Automated: it can be wrong.

Comments
72 pages including appendices, 5 figures

Related papers

What Must a Quantum-Memory Decoder Know About Temporally Correlated Noise?

Danesh Morales-Hashemi, Graeme Smith, Ningping Cao

What must a quantum error-correction decoder know about temporally correlated noise, and what does it cost to learn? We study this question for fixed stabilizer memory experiments with known system-environment interactions. We formulate calibration in terms of the fidelity differences that select a Pauli recovery and relate missing information to the resulting fidelity loss. Our main example uses weak coherent $X$ rotations in a class of CSS codes including Shor, Steane, and odd-distance rotated surface codes. All physical qubits share a sign either fixed throughout a run or independently redrawn each interval. The two models have identical syndrome statistics and the same spatiotemporal Pauli process (SPP), obtained by Pauli-twirling every noise interval. Yet at suitable storage times, they require different logical corrections. In the weak-noise limit, each model is almost perfectly correctable when known. Without model information, even the best final recovery has a worst-case fidelity loss approaching $1/2$ relative to the noise-aware optimum, despite access to the full syndrome record. For this pair of models, at fixed code and fixed positive target loss below $1/2$, we prove matching calibration bounds. With logical preparation and final readout, complete QEC cycles require a number of noise intervals scaling as the inverse rotation angle raised to the code's $X$ distance. Allowing two uninterrupted intervals before one extraction reduces the optimal cost to inverse-square scaling. Physical Pauli twirling of every noise interval changes both recovery performance and its information requirements. Discarding the record of applied random Pauli operations makes the SPP sufficient for optimal recovery. Keeping this record can improve the attainable fidelity, but reaching that optimum may require additional noise information.

quant-pharXiv:2610.03545•Oct 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum change point metrology

Xu Chen, Xue Ma

We quantify the extra Bayes risk of locating a quantum change point and estimating its amplitude with one measurement. The joint and marginal optimizations use the full record and the same joint prior, with both parameters unknown. For product records on a known pure state curve, position has clipped absolute loss in resolution units, and amplitude offset has squared loss in fixed calibrated units. Ideal steps exhibit certified conflict at finite signal strength, including in phase records of sixteen qubits, and recover both informative marginal optima at strong signal. For finite offset prior width, a retained quantum boundary region serves position, and the remaining suffix serves amplitude. Physical recovery holds when strength grows more slowly than the square root of record length. Known smooth rises also admit leading recovery in the coherent experiment as strength grows and width shrinks. For the quintic profile, we establish two residual cost scaling laws. The residual cost is $Θ(s^{-2})$ as $s\to\infty$. Taking the strong signal limit at fixed $w$ yields a limiting cost of $Θ(w^3)$ as $w\to0$. In the resolved local model, quadratic position loss admits a common optimum within the covariant class. These results link onset geometry and decision loss to Bayesian measurement compatibility in quantum change point estimation.

quant-pharXiv:2610.38345•Oct 29, 2026•0 citations

Optimal Decoding of 2D Compass Codes Under Coherent Noise

Bálint Pató, Qiang Miao, Kenneth R. Brown

Coherent noise on the physical qubits can lead to coherent error on the logical qubits in a quantum error-corrected system, even if the best recovery operator is found. An optimal decoder under coherent noise finds the minimal angle of the logical, coherent rotation for a given physical rotation angle under the uniform, coherent noise model. We show that one can optimally decode$2\mathrm{D}$compass codes without an explicit optimal decoder in polynomial complexity by simply flipping the sampled logical angle using a Majorana simulator and a sub-optimal decoder. Estimating the threshold requires tools different from MWPM decoding. As the infidelity curves don't intersect, we use finite-size scaling to evaluate optimal decoding performance by estimating the logical infidelity at the infinite distance limit. We motivate our finite size scaling ansatz based on repetition code-like compass codes for which we can exactly calculate the logical channel up to a distance of up to 1021. Under optimal decoding, our finite-size scaling methods predict a threshold of$(0.274\pm 0.010)\pi$for the surface code and a threshold of$(0.252\pm 0.001)\pi$for the m=2 Z-stacked Shor code. We compare our results to previous predictions and find a slight deviation in the case of the Z-stacked Shor code and a slight decrease in the case of the surface code.

IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 15, 2024•0 citations

Code-Visible Liouvillian Modes and Coherent Logical Errors in Quantum Codes

Marina Gordeychuk, Oleg Kiselev

Coherent Hamiltonian drifts and systematic errors can pass through quantum error correction differently than stochastic Pauli noise: they generate phase components of the logical channel that are lost under full Pauli twirling. We consider the Lindbladian dynamics of \(n\) physical qubits propagated through an effective logical channel of a fixed encoding, recovery, and decoding scheme. The work is methodological in character: standard ideas of observability and minimal realization from linear systems theory are applied to the channel \[ ω \mapsto Φ_t(ω) = \cD e^{t\cL}\cE(ω), \] where \(\cE\) encodes the logical state and \(\cD\) is the chosen recovery map with final decoding. The minimal code-visible space \(\cK_{\rm code}\) is defined as the Krylov closure of the decodable logical observables with respect to \(\cL^\dagger\); its observable factorization yields a minimal realization of the logical channel. In this form, the Knill--Laflamme conditions serve as a short-time consistency check, Pauli noise on stabilizer codes reduces to a chain on syndrome-logical classes, and the choice of recovery map acts as a spectral filter on the visible modes. For quantum memory, the same language yields an estimate of the storage time in terms of the dominant visible eigenvalues of the logical channel of the correction cycle. Particular attention is paid to the spectral signatures of coherent noise and to how these signatures depend on the chosen decoder.

quant-pharXiv:2609.18978•Jul 20, 2026•0 citations

Finite-classical-record quantum state reconstruction: one-shot bounds and acquisition limits

Wahyu Rahmaniar

Abstract We study the one-shot reconstruction of a quantum state when a single copy of the source is measured, the outcome is stored in a classical record of fixed finite dimension, and a state is prepared at the destination from the record. This acquisition-limited problem is distinguished from a visible benchmark in which the source label is available to the encoder. For a finite ensemble we derive finite-record bounds on the visible distortion in terms of the cumulative prior mass covered by the record and the optimal discrimination probability, identify the regimes in which they are exact, and solve the two-state visible problem at every record dimension. For pure-state ensembles, exact acquisition-limited reconstruction is possible if and only if the states are perfectly distinguishable, so nonorthogonal targets retain a positive error at every record dimension. For two equiprobable nonorthogonal pure states we derive the optimal trace-distance distortion within the reflection-symmetric two-outcome class in closed variational form and find that unrestricted numerical optimization with up to six outcomes attains the same value; the resulting symmetric value lies strictly below the guess-and-prepare, unambiguous-discrimination, fidelity-optimal, and Haar-random strategies and is realized by one classical bit and one feed-forward rotation. Every classical-record reconstruction is shown to be entanglement breaking, with a quantitative bound on the loss of entanglement with an inaccessible reference, and the record dimension is related to the spectral rank of an energy-constrained memory. These results quantify the separation between a finite classical description and the information obtainable from a single quantum system. MSC Classification: 81P15 , 81P17 , 81P45 , 81P47

•Sep 24, 2026•0 citations

Classical communication with an exact photon budget: finite-block limits and optimal input ensembles

Zixuan He

What can be transmitted with a fixed photon supply? An optical source that supplies exactly K photons across n modes poses a concrete communication problem: how many messages can it transmit at a chosen error probability, and which input states make the best use of those photons? This paper gives directly evaluable coding bounds for pure loss and identifies the exact optimal input ensembles for identical noisy Gaussian channels. The results allow researchers to assess finite optical blocks, quantify the information cost of fixing the photon supply, and determine when entanglement between separately constrained blocks can be dispensed with. Every message is supported on the same exact K-photon sector. Within that sector, encoding may use arbitrary mixed states and entanglement among modes, and the receiver may perform a joint measurement. Communication is unassisted. All logarithms below are natural; information is measured in nats. Finite-message bounds and the optimal third-order rate For n ≥ 2 identical pure-loss channels of transmissivity 0 < η < 1 and K ≥ 1, the number L of surviving photons has the same binomial distribution for every encoded state. Define \[p_\ell=\binom K\ell\eta^\ell(1-\eta)^{K-\ell},\qquad d_{n,\ell}=\binom{n+\ell-1}{\ell}.\] If ps*(M;n,K) is the best average success probability for M equiprobable messages, then \[\sum_{\ell=0}^{K}p_\ell\left[1-\frac{M-1}{d_{n,\ell}}\right]_+\le p_{\mathrm s}^{*}(M;n,K)\le\sum_{\ell=0}^{K}p_\ell\min\!\left\{1,\frac{d_{n,\ell}}{M}\right\}.\] Here [x]+ = max{x,0}. The lower bound provides an achievable guarantee; the upper bound limits every admissible code. Evaluating both sums brackets the performance at a specified photon supply and block length. Their proof has a simple physical interpretation: surviving photons determine the available output dimension, while one collective-mode codebook works across all possible survivor counts. For fixed E > 0, fixed error tolerance 0 < ε < 1, Kn = ⌊nE⌋ and en = Kn/n, the bounds determine the largest message count through third order: \[\log M^*(n,K_n,\varepsilon)=ng(\eta e_n)+\sqrt{n\eta(1-\eta)e_n}\,h(\eta e_n)\Phi_{\mathrm N}^{-1}(\varepsilon)-\tfrac12\log n+O(1).\] Here g(x) = (x+1)log(x+1) − x log x, h(x) = log(1+1/x), and ΦN is the standard normal distribution function. This fixes both the fluctuation scale and the optimal −½ log n correction. The finite bounds also yield the exact decay exponent of success above capacity and a matching error exponent on a specified interval below capacity. Which inputs are optimal under Gaussian noise? For n identical nonidentity gauge-covariant Gaussian channels, with thermal photon means transformed as r ↦ ar+b, a > 0 and b ≥ max{0,a−1}, the paper determines the exact fixed-photon Holevo optimum and every ensemble attaining it. Each optimal letter places all K photons in one collective mode: \[|K,u\rangle=\frac{\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n}u_j a_j^\dagger\right)^K}{\sqrt{K!}}|0\rangle,\qquad \sum_j|u_j|^2=1.\] An ensemble is optimal precisely when almost all its letters have this form and its average is uniform on the K-photon sector. A finite weighted optimal ensemble exists. These collective modes may themselves extend across, and be entangled among, physical optical modes. Thus the characterization identifies the structure to optimize without imposing a Gaussian-input restriction. The central proof step combines different loss histories that end in the same output photon sector. A common ordering of the comparison eigenstates allows the separate majorization bounds to be combined. For pure loss, a quantitative rigidity estimate further converts a small Holevo deficit into closeness to collective-mode number states. Resource cost and communication across blocks At fixed positive photon density and fixed nonidentity Gaussian noise, requiring an exact photon supply incurs a Holevo penalty of ½ log n plus an explicitly determined constant, relative to the usual mean-energy value. The paper separates this cost into photon-count uncertainty and the mismatch from a thermal output distribution. For separately constrained blocks of quantum-limited loss, quantum-limited amplification or entanglement-breaking Gaussian noise, the one-block Holevo values add exactly. Every optimal letter is a product of blockwise collective-mode number states, and the repeated-block unassisted classical capacity equals the one-block Holevo value. The low-rate reliability interval outside the matching range and repeated-block additivity for intermediate Gaussian noise remain open.

•Oct 13, 2026•0 citations
Recovery from a coherent rotation with an unobserved angle depends on both the encoding and what calibration reveals about the noise. We determine their combined limit for a known finite-dimensional generator and one final recovery. Two polynomial projections organize the answer. A physical Krylov chain separates correctable error amplitudes from their first state-dependent distortion; projection onto lower-angle powers identifies the part that a coherent decoder can cancel. Under explicit rank and moment conditions, their combination gives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity at weak noise and a recovery attaining it for any finite logical dimension. The optimal worst-input error lies between one and ddd times that infidelity at leading order, for logical dimension ddd. When the angle distribution is unknown, we optimize one decoder for every distribution compatible with the calibration. When spectral and calibration frequencies are integer multiples of a common frequency, moment positivity turns this into an exact finite optimization. Small measured means can still allow rare finite rotations. If the sole calibration datum is βr=E[sin⁡2r(θ/2)]β_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(θ/2)]βr​=E[sin2r(θ/2)], with θθθ the wrapped rotation phase at that common frequency, the optimal worst-prior infidelity is O(βr)O(β_r)O(βr​) exactly when generator powers through degree r−1r-1r−1 are correctable. When the first uncorrectable power has degree m<rm<rm<r, the optimal loss scales as βrm/rβ_r^{m/r}βrm/r​, with a sharp coefficient fixed by a universal moment problem. In a loss-free four-photon memory, population measurements at two calibration durations retain the fully informed quartic error coefficient for a fixed symmetric narrow-noise family with positive variance and finite fourth moment; a single duration permits loss quadratic in the noise width.
The paper studies a fixed finite-dimensional quantum encoding exposed to e−iσxHe^{-i\sigma xH}e−iσxH, with known HHH but unobserved random angle, followed by one deterministic recovery. It asks how encoding geometry and incomplete calibration jointly limit recovery fidelity.
For a nondegenerate prefix correcting I,H,…,HLI,H,\ldots,H^LI,H,…,HL, it derives the exact leading optimal entanglement infidelity, 1−Fe,opt=gL2hmVσ2m/(m!)2+o(σ2m)1-F_{e,\mathrm{opt}}=g_L^2h_m\mathcal V\sigma^{2m}/(m!)^2+o(\sigma^{2m})1−Fe,opt​=gL2​hm​Vσ2m/(m!)2+o(σ2m), where m=L+1m=L+1m=L+1. Physical block-Krylov orthogonalization determines propagation gLg_LgL​ and logical boundary distortion V\mathcal VV; projection of xmx^mxm onto lower angle powers determines residual variance hmh_mhm​. A coherently adjusted, polar-aligned recovery attains the coefficient, with a converse covering all CPTP recoveries. After a known logical rotation is removed, optimal half-diamond error lies between one and ddd times optimal entanglement infidelity at leading order. Petz recovery doubles the occupied-shell contribution but retains the optimal leakage contribution.
For uncertain priors, a minimax polynomial selects one common decoder. Commensurate spectral and calibration frequencies permit exact finite moment optimization. With sole datum βr=E[sin⁡2r(θ/2)]\beta_r=\mathbb E[\sin^{2r}(\theta/2)]βr​=E[sin2r(θ/2)], worst-prior infidelity is O(βr)O(\beta_r)O(βr​) exactly when powers through r−1r-1r−1 are correctable; a first defective power m<rm<rm<r instead gives βrm/r\beta_r^{m/r}βrm/r​ scaling under additional boundary hypotheses. In a loss-free four-photon example, two calibration durations retain the informed quartic coefficient, whereas one permits quadratic loss.
The local theorem requires rank and moment conditions; uniform guarantees require tail control. The model excludes independently fluctuating or noncommuting generators and control during storage. Optical recovery implementability and photon loss remain unresolved.
What must a quantum error-correction decoder know about temporally correlated noise, and what does it cost to learn? We study this question for fixed stabilizer memory experiments with known system-environment interactions. We formulate calibration in terms of the fidelity differences that select a Pauli recovery and relate missing information to the resulting fidelity loss. Our main example uses weak coherent XXX rotations in a class of CSS codes including Shor, Steane, and odd-distance rotated surface codes. All physical qubits share a sign either fixed throughout a run or independently redrawn each interval. The two models have identical syndrome statistics and the same spatiotemporal Pauli process (SPP), obtained by Pauli-twirling every noise interval. Yet at suitable storage times, they require different logical corrections. In the weak-noise limit, each model is almost perfectly correctable when known. Without model information, even the best final recovery has a worst-case fidelity loss approaching 1/21/21/2 relative to the noise-aware optimum, despite access to the full syndrome record. For this pair of models, at fixed code and fixed positive target loss below 1/21/21/2, we prove matching calibration bounds. With logical preparation and final readout, complete QEC cycles require a number of noise intervals scaling as the inverse rotation angle raised to the code's XXX distance. Allowing two uninterrupted intervals before one extraction reduces the optimal cost to inverse-square scaling. Physical Pauli twirling of every noise interval changes both recovery performance and its information requirements. Discarding the record of applied random Pauli operations makes the SPP sufficient for optimal recovery. Keeping this record can improve the attainable fidelity, but reaching that optimum may require additional noise information.
We quantify the extra Bayes risk of locating a quantum change point and estimating its amplitude with one measurement. The joint and marginal optimizations use the full record and the same joint prior, with both parameters unknown. For product records on a known pure state curve, position has clipped absolute loss in resolution units, and amplitude offset has squared loss in fixed calibrated units. Ideal steps exhibit certified conflict at finite signal strength, including in phase records of sixteen qubits, and recover both informative marginal optima at strong signal. For finite offset prior width, a retained quantum boundary region serves position, and the remaining suffix serves amplitude. Physical recovery holds when strength grows more slowly than the square root of record length. Known smooth rises also admit leading recovery in the coherent experiment as strength grows and width shrinks. For the quintic profile, we establish two residual cost scaling laws. The residual cost is Θ(s−2)Θ(s^{-2})Θ(s−2) as s→∞s\to\inftys→∞. Taking the strong signal limit at fixed www yields a limiting cost of Θ(w3)Θ(w^3)Θ(w3) as w→0w\to0w→0. In the resolved local model, quadratic position loss admits a common optimum within the covariant class. These results link onset geometry and decision loss to Bayesian measurement compatibility in quantum change point estimation.
Coherent noise on the physical qubits can lead to coherent error on the logical qubits in a quantum error-corrected system, even if the best recovery operator is found. An optimal decoder under coherent noise finds the minimal angle of the logical, coherent rotation for a given physical rotation angle under the uniform, coherent noise model. We show that one can optimally decode2D2\mathrm{D}2Dcompass codes without an explicit optimal decoder in polynomial complexity by simply flipping the sampled logical angle using a Majorana simulator and a sub-optimal decoder. Estimating the threshold requires tools different from MWPM decoding. As the infidelity curves don't intersect, we use finite-size scaling to evaluate optimal decoding performance by estimating the logical infidelity at the infinite distance limit. We motivate our finite size scaling ansatz based on repetition code-like compass codes for which we can exactly calculate the logical channel up to a distance of up to 1021. Under optimal decoding, our finite-size scaling methods predict a threshold of(0.274±0.010)π(0.274\pm 0.010)\pi(0.274±0.010)πfor the surface code and a threshold of(0.252±0.001)π(0.252\pm 0.001)\pi(0.252±0.001)πfor the m=2 Z-stacked Shor code. We compare our results to previous predictions and find a slight deviation in the case of the Z-stacked Shor code and a slight decrease in the case of the surface code.
Coherent Hamiltonian drifts and systematic errors can pass through quantum error correction differently than stochastic Pauli noise: they generate phase components of the logical channel that are lost under full Pauli twirling. We consider the Lindbladian dynamics of nnn physical qubits propagated through an effective logical channel of a fixed encoding, recovery, and decoding scheme. The work is methodological in character: standard ideas of observability and minimal realization from linear systems theory are applied to the channel \[ ω \mapsto Φ_t(ω) = \cD e^{t\cL}\cE(ω), \] where \(\cE\) encodes the logical state and \(\cD\) is the chosen recovery map with final decoding. The minimal code-visible space \(\cK_{\rm code}\) is defined as the Krylov closure of the decodable logical observables with respect to \(\cL^\dagger\); its observable factorization yields a minimal realization of the logical channel. In this form, the Knill--Laflamme conditions serve as a short-time consistency check, Pauli noise on stabilizer codes reduces to a chain on syndrome-logical classes, and the choice of recovery map acts as a spectral filter on the visible modes. For quantum memory, the same language yields an estimate of the storage time in terms of the dominant visible eigenvalues of the logical channel of the correction cycle. Particular attention is paid to the spectral signatures of coherent noise and to how these signatures depend on the chosen decoder.
Abstract We study the one-shot reconstruction of a quantum state when a single copy of the source is measured, the outcome is stored in a classical record of fixed finite dimension, and a state is prepared at the destination from the record. This acquisition-limited problem is distinguished from a visible benchmark in which the source label is available to the encoder. For a finite ensemble we derive finite-record bounds on the visible distortion in terms of the cumulative prior mass covered by the record and the optimal discrimination probability, identify the regimes in which they are exact, and solve the two-state visible problem at every record dimension. For pure-state ensembles, exact acquisition-limited reconstruction is possible if and only if the states are perfectly distinguishable, so nonorthogonal targets retain a positive error at every record dimension. For two equiprobable nonorthogonal pure states we derive the optimal trace-distance distortion within the reflection-symmetric two-outcome class in closed variational form and find that unrestricted numerical optimization with up to six outcomes attains the same value; the resulting symmetric value lies strictly below the guess-and-prepare, unambiguous-discrimination, fidelity-optimal, and Haar-random strategies and is realized by one classical bit and one feed-forward rotation. Every classical-record reconstruction is shown to be entanglement breaking, with a quantitative bound on the loss of entanglement with an inaccessible reference, and the record dimension is related to the spectral rank of an energy-constrained memory. These results quantify the separation between a finite classical description and the information obtainable from a single quantum system. MSC Classification: 81P15 , 81P17 , 81P45 , 81P47
What can be transmitted with a fixed photon supply? An optical source that supplies exactly K photons across n modes poses a concrete communication problem: how many messages can it transmit at a chosen error probability, and which input states make the best use of those photons? This paper gives directly evaluable coding bounds for pure loss and identifies the exact optimal input ensembles for identical noisy Gaussian channels. The results allow researchers to assess finite optical blocks, quantify the information cost of fixing the photon supply, and determine when entanglement between separately constrained blocks can be dispensed with. Every message is supported on the same exact K-photon sector. Within that sector, encoding may use arbitrary mixed states and entanglement among modes, and the receiver may perform a joint measurement. Communication is unassisted. All logarithms below are natural; information is measured in nats. Finite-message bounds and the optimal third-order rate For n ≥ 2 identical pure-loss channels of transmissivity 0 < η < 1 and K ≥ 1, the number L of surviving photons has the same binomial distribution for every encoded state. Define pℓ=(Kℓ)ηℓ(1−η)K−ℓ,dn,ℓ=(n+ℓ−1ℓ).p_\ell=\binom K\ell\eta^\ell(1-\eta)^{K-\ell},\qquad d_{n,\ell}=\binom{n+\ell-1}{\ell}.pℓ​=(ℓK​)ηℓ(1−η)K−ℓ,dn,ℓ​=(ℓn+ℓ−1​). If ps*(M;n,K) is the best average success probability for M equiprobable messages, then ∑ℓ=0Kpℓ[1−M−1dn,ℓ]+≤ps∗(M;n,K)≤∑ℓ=0Kpℓmin⁡ ⁣{1,dn,ℓM}.\sum_{\ell=0}^{K}p_\ell\left[1-\frac{M-1}{d_{n,\ell}}\right]_+\le p_{\mathrm s}^{*}(M;n,K)\le\sum_{\ell=0}^{K}p_\ell\min\!\left\{1,\frac{d_{n,\ell}}{M}\right\}.∑ℓ=0K​pℓ​[1−dn,ℓ​M−1​]+​≤ps∗​(M;n,K)≤∑ℓ=0K​pℓ​min{1,Mdn,ℓ​​}. Here [x]+ = max{x,0}. The lower bound provides an achievable guarantee; the upper bound limits every admissible code. Evaluating both sums brackets the performance at a specified photon supply and block length. Their proof has a simple physical interpretation: surviving photons determine the available output dimension, while one collective-mode codebook works across all possible survivor counts. For fixed E > 0, fixed error tolerance 0 < ε < 1, Kn = ⌊nE⌋ and en = Kn/n, the bounds determine the largest message count through third order: log⁡M∗(n,Kn,ε)=ng(ηen)+nη(1−η)en h(ηen)ΦN−1(ε)−12log⁡n+O(1).\log M^*(n,K_n,\varepsilon)=ng(\eta e_n)+\sqrt{n\eta(1-\eta)e_n}\,h(\eta e_n)\Phi_{\mathrm N}^{-1}(\varepsilon)-\tfrac12\log n+O(1).logM∗(n,Kn​,ε)=ng(ηen​)+nη(1−η)en​​h(ηen​)ΦN−1​(ε)−21​logn+O(1). Here g(x) = (x+1)log(x+1) − x log x, h(x) = log(1+1/x), and ΦN is the standard normal distribution function. This fixes both the fluctuation scale and the optimal −½ log n correction. The finite bounds also yield the exact decay exponent of success above capacity and a matching error exponent on a specified interval below capacity. Which inputs are optimal under Gaussian noise? For n identical nonidentity gauge-covariant Gaussian channels, with thermal photon means transformed as r ↦ ar+b, a > 0 and b ≥ max{0,a−1}, the paper determines the exact fixed-photon Holevo optimum and every ensemble attaining it. Each optimal letter places all K photons in one collective mode: ∣K,u⟩=(∑j=1nujaj†)KK!∣0⟩,∑j∣uj∣2=1.|K,u\rangle=\frac{\left(\sum_{j=1}^{n}u_j a_j^\dagger\right)^K}{\sqrt{K!}}|0\rangle,\qquad \sum_j|u_j|^2=1.∣K,u⟩=K!​(∑j=1n​uj​aj†​)K​∣0⟩,∑j​∣uj​∣2=1. An ensemble is optimal precisely when almost all its letters have this form and its average is uniform on the K-photon sector. A finite weighted optimal ensemble exists. These collective modes may themselves extend across, and be entangled among, physical optical modes. Thus the characterization identifies the structure to optimize without imposing a Gaussian-input restriction. The central proof step combines different loss histories that end in the same output photon sector. A common ordering of the comparison eigenstates allows the separate majorization bounds to be combined. For pure loss, a quantitative rigidity estimate further converts a small Holevo deficit into closeness to collective-mode number states. Resource cost and communication across blocks At fixed positive photon density and fixed nonidentity Gaussian noise, requiring an exact photon supply incurs a Holevo penalty of ½ log n plus an explicitly determined constant, relative to the usual mean-energy value. The paper separates this cost into photon-count uncertainty and the mismatch from a thermal output distribution. For separately constrained blocks of quantum-limited loss, quantum-limited amplification or entanglement-breaking Gaussian noise, the one-block Holevo values add exactly. Every optimal letter is a product of blockwise collective-mode number states, and the repeated-block unassisted classical capacity equals the one-block Holevo value. The low-rate reliability interval outside the matching range and repeated-block additivity for intermediate Gaussian noise remain open.