The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in physics research is increasingly common, yet few guidelines exist for its effective use. Starting with a principles-based approach, we outline a set of ten requirements for collaborative AI agents in experimental physics, spanning scientific norms, effective agent use, and domain expertise. We take a human-centered approach in which agents act as collaborators that amplify rather than replace the expertise of a human researcher (user) who directs the work and is responsible for its results. We then present a framework designed to enforce these requirements, detailing methods for improving off-the-shelf behavior of large language models (LLMs) with custom scaffolding and describing general-purpose scientific workflows and skills. In particular, we highlight the power of closed-loop campaigns where agents work iteratively toward a well-defined goal. We demonstrate the potential of this mode of research through six case studies in experimental physics, covering device design, hardware control, neural network optimization, physical model identification, and data analysis. All six case studies result in useful work products that add utility to our research, including a neural network architecture and solid-state quantum defect photodynamic model that substantially outperform our published work; a microwave waveguide design that extends a published design concept to a fabrication-ready device meeting our experimental constraints; a quantum control pulse sequence candidate that improves simulated performance by more than an order of magnitude; commissioning of an NMR spectrometer to $\sim$1~Hz frequency precision on live hardware; and finally a data-fitting pipeline that achieves, to our knowledge, the first reconstruction of the Ising microstate of an artificial spin-ice array from diffraction-limited magnetic imaging.
The use of artificial intelligence (AI) in physics research is increasingly common, yet few guidelines exist for its effective use. Starting with a principles-based approach, we outline a set of ten requirements for collaborative AI agents in experimental physics, spanning scientific norms, effective agent use, and domain expertise. We take a human-centered approach in which agents act as collaborators that amplify rather than replace the expertise of a human researcher (user) who directs the work and is responsible for its results. We then present a framework designed to enforce these requirements, detailing methods for improving off-the-shelf behavior of large language models (LLMs) with custom scaffolding and describing general-purpose scientific workflows and skills. In particular, we highlight the power of closed-loop campaigns where agents work iteratively toward a well-defined goal. We demonstrate the potential of this mode of research through six case studies in experimental physics, covering device design, hardware control, neural network optimization, physical model identification, and data analysis. All six case studies result in useful work products that add utility to our research, including a neural network architecture and solid-state quantum defect photodynamic model that substantially outperform our published work; a microwave waveguide design that extends a published design concept to a fabrication-ready device meeting our experimental constraints; a quantum control pulse sequence candidate that improves simulated performance by more than an order of magnitude; commissioning of an NMR spectrometer to ∼1~Hz frequency precision on live hardware; and finally a data-fitting pipeline that achieves, to our knowledge, the first reconstruction of the Ising microstate of an artificial spin-ice array from diffraction-limited magnetic imaging.
An autonomous research laboratory could conduct an entire study, from formulating questions to preparing manuscripts. Artificial intelligence (AI) offers one route towards this goal. Recent AI systems take on several research roles, but may draw conclusions that the evidence does not support. Here, we present an autonomous research laboratory in which agents based on large language models assess one another's work and can stop or redirect investigations. They can generate and reject research questions, require separate theoretical checks and conduct experiments designed to challenge their claims. We demonstrate these capabilities by investigating ensembles of quantum spins in diamond. The agents derived the minimum number of calibration settings needed to predict responses to a defined family of microwave pulse sequences. They checked the result computationally and designed experiments to distinguish competing predictions. An initial experiment agreed with the theoretical predictions, but repeated reference measurements showed that the signal was drifting during data collection. The agents therefore treated the result as inconclusive and revised the measurement protocol without relaxing the acceptance criteria. The revised experiment met those criteria and supported the theoretical predictions. This study demonstrates that collaborating AI agents can select research questions, derive theoretical results and test their predictions experimentally.
Quantum computers are moving from research laboratories to industrial machines accessible via the cloud and integrated into high-performance computing facilities. However, translating theoretical quantum protocols into hardware experiments remains a major bottleneck, requiring expertise across protocol design, compilation, simulation, and cloud execution. Here, we introduce an agentic workflow that automates this pipeline on neutral-atom quantum processors (here two Pasqal QPUs available on the cloud) while keeping the researcher in the loop for critical validation. In three case studies from many-body physics and optimization, the agent went from published paper or patent to a QPU campaign run overnight. In particular, human intervention was crucial to ensure scientific validity: the agent selected an inadequate observable in one experiment and constructed a plausible but incorrect hardware diagnosis in another, with both failures detected only through domain-expert review. Finally, we use a second agent to classify a corpus of 633 Rydberg-array arXiv papers and show that nearly half are implementable on present-day QPUs while identifying specific hardware upgrades needed for the rest. Together, these results demonstrate that agentic workflows provide a practical bridge between theoretical ideas and physical hardware, opening quantum experimentation to a much broader scientific community.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is used in numerous fields of science, yet the initial research questions and targets are still almost always provided by human researchers. AI-generated creative ideas in science are rare and often vague, so that it remains a human task to execute them. Automating idea generation and implementation in one coherent system would significantly shift the role of humans in the scientific process. Here we present AI-Mandel, an LLM agent that can generate and implement ideas in quantum physics. AI-Mandel formulates ideas from the literature and uses a domain-specific AI tool to turn them into concrete experiment designs that can readily be implemented in laboratories. The generated ideas by AI-Mandel are often scientifically interesting - for two of them we have already written independent scientific follow-up papers. The ideas include new variations of quantum teleportation, primitives of quantum networks in indefinite causal orders, and new concepts of geometric phases based on closed loops of quantum information transfer. AI-Mandel is a prototypical demonstration of an AI physicist that can generate and implement concrete, actionable ideas. Building such a system is not only useful to accelerate science, but it also reveals concrete open challenges on the path to human-level artificial scientists.
We implement an agentic AI workflow built around a large language model (LLM) agent for autonomous experiments with nitrogen-vacancy (NV) centers in diamond. NV centers are a widely used platform for quantum sensing, and the ability to control many measurements from a computer makes NV experiments a natural setting for autonomous workflows. We make two main contributions. First, we demonstrate an autonomous NV experiment workflow that combines persistent project records, quantitative calculation and data analysis tools, and deterministic experiment control. In one autonomous experiment, the agent selected a single NV center, calibrated its resonant frequency, measured T2∗ with Ramsey measurements, and added a Carr--Purcell--Meiboom--Gill (CPMG) measurement to check a weak feature that could be related to nearby 13C. Second, we introduce two offline benchmarks that evaluate the agent's reasoning separately from laboratory execution. We evaluated both benchmarks with GPT-5.4, GPT-5.5, and GPT-5.6 Sol. In the Ramsey checkpoint benchmark, greater reasoning effort generally improved recognition of a residual resonance calibration offset. By contrast, in the pulsed optically detected magnetic resonance (pODMR) data evaluation benchmark, pulse sequence information alone produced more false positive resonance judgments at higher reasoning effort. Requiring an expected signal calculation kept false positive rates low across all three models and reasoning settings. The results suggest a clear division of labor for autonomous experiments. The agent forms scientific hypotheses and uses quantitative tools to evaluate data, while deterministic code controls the hardware and enforces safety constraints.
The rapid integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) into scientific writing fundamentally challenges traditional definitions of authorship, responsibility, and scientific integrity. As researchers transition from using computers as deterministic tools to managing them as ``virtual collaborators,'' the nature of human contribution must be re-evaluated. Using the drafting process of a recent computational physics manuscript as a case study, this essay explores the indispensable role of the Human-in-the-Loop (HITL). We demonstrate that while AI excels at structural organization and syntax generation, the human author bears the ultimate responsibility for enforcing rigorous physical logic, maintaining academic diplomacy, and anticipating peer-review critiques. In this paradigm, the human contribution shifts from writing boilerplate text to acting as a Principal Investigator who actively mentors and steers the AI's reasoning. To ensure accountability and preserve the integrity of the scientific record in this new era, I argue that the community must mandate the publication of full, unedited AI interaction transcripts as standard supplementary material.
With the rapid advancement of artificial intelligence (AI), a new paradigm is evolving that includes agentic AI systems capable of autonomously reasoning, planning, and executing multi-step actions. This chapter provides a detailed overview of agentic AI, AI agents, and the developing area of quantum AI agents – systems that utilize the capabilities of quantum computers to exceed the limits imposed by classical computer architecture. In addition to analyzing the architectural foundations of contemporary AI agents such as large language model (LLM)-based agents, multi-agent systems, and hybrid classical–quantum architectures, this chapter presents a unified theoretical framework for understanding how the application of quantum enhancement could result in exponential improvements in optimization, simulation, and pattern recognition abilities of agents using recent advances in quantum machine learning, variational quantum algorithms, and quantum neural networks. Furthermore, this chapter examines transformative applications across healthcare, finance, scientific discovery, and autonomous systems while identifying the current limitations of quantum AI, including decoherence, qubit counts, and alignment challenges. Finally, this chapter concludes that the intersection of agentic AI and quantum computing is likely one of the most significant technological developments of the 21st century, requiring sustained research, ethical frameworks, and inter-disciplinary cooperation.