Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2610.06541

Products of unitaries as continuous evolutions at finite precision

Michael Jarret

quant-phmath-phSubmitted Oct 5, 2026• Announced Oct 6, 2026• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I present a short approach to discretizing continuous unitary evolution. It gives a correspondence in both directions between continuous unitary evolutions and products of unitaries in finite dimensions, and I use it to reduce discrete adiabatic theorems to continuous ones. At fine steps, holding truncated samples of a regulated Hamiltonian on a suitable finite partition gives an approximating product. Conversely, rounding the clock identifies a product of $T$ unit-step samples with a continuous evolution, up to two half-step phases. I bound its operator-norm distance from the original evolution by $O(1/T)$ through cancellation within each time step. This assumes bounded first and second derivatives, bounded spectral width, and eigenvalue differences bounded away from nonzero multiples of $2π$, uniformly in $T$. For a unitary walk with these derivative bounds, a fixed common free spectral arc supplies a Hermitian logarithm path satisfying the comparison hypotheses. Continuous simulation guarantees then transfer to the phase-corrected product, and continuous adiabatic bounds to the product itself, with an explicit additive $O(1/T)$ error and each adiabatic theorem's hypotheses retained. For positive definite quantum linear systems of condition number $κ$, this comparison and continuous adiabatic theory give a rescaled qubitized walk with $O(κ/δ)$ steps for leakage $δ$, matching the scaling previously obtained through a discrete adiabatic theorem. These products need no discrete adiabatic theorem.

Comments
26 pages, 0 figures

Related papers

Sigma-Time Quantum Dynamics I: Unitary BV-Clock Evolutions with Gates and Pulses

Ben F.T. Tibola

Quantum dynamics is usually written relative to a smooth external time parameter, while actual control schedules often contain waits, pulses, gates, resets, and event-like interventions. This paper develops the first unitary part of a sigma-time quantum dynamics framework. We define a bounded-Hamiltonian quantum evolution over a finite-horizon bounded-variation sigma clock with a continuous clock component, flat clock intervals, and a locally finite set of atom times carrying unitary gates. Under these hypotheses the sigma-chronological product exists, is unitary, composes as an evolution family, conserves wave-function norm, is strongly continuous away from atom times, and obeys a sharp atom/gate insertion law. We also prove a fixed-clock perturbation estimate and a bounded isolated-pulse corridor in which shrinking finite-width pulses converge in operator norm to declared atomic gates. The result is deliberately scoped: it does not claim an unbounded Schroedinger-operator theorem, a measurement theorem, an open-system theorem, or a Zeno limit theorem. A finite qubit benchmark with two bounded waits and one atomic gate is included as a reproducibility appendix and verifies unitary defect, trace preservation, Choi positivity, and output-state validity to machine precision

•May 28, 2026•0 citations

Optimal Scaling Quantum Linear-Systems Solver via Discrete Adiabatic Theorem

Pedro C. S. Costa, Dong An, Yuval R. Sanders +3 more

Recently, several approaches to solving linear systems on a quantum computer have been formulated in terms of the quantum adiabatic theorem for a continuously varying Hamiltonian.Such approaches have enabled near-linear scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system, without requiring a complicated variable-time amplitude amplification procedure.However, the most efficient of those procedures is still asymptotically suboptimal by a factor of log(κ).Here, we prove a rigorous form of the adiabatic theorem that bounds the error in terms of the spectral gap for intrinsically discrete-time evolutions.In combination with the qubitized quantum walk, our discrete adiabatic theorem gives a speed-up for all adiabatic algorithms.Here, we use this combination to develop a quantum algorithm for solving linear systems that is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that the complexity is strictly linear in κ, matching a known lower bound on the complexity.Our O[κ log(1/ )] complexity is also optimal in terms of the combined scaling in κ and the precision .Compared to existing suboptimal methods, our algorithm is simpler and easier to implement.Moreover, we determine the constant factors in the algorithm, which would be suitable for determining the complexity in terms of gate counts for specific applications.

arXiv:2111.08152•PRX Quantum•Oct 7, 2022•120 citations

Large time-step discretization of adiabatic quantum dynamics

Dong Un An, Pedro C. S. Costa, Dominic William Berry

Adiabatic quantum computing is a general framework for preparing eigenstates of Hamiltonians on quantum devices. However, its digital implementation requires an efficient Hamiltonian simulation subroutine, which may introduce extra computational overhead or complicated quantum control logic. In this work, we show that the time-step sizes in time discretization can be much larger than expected, and the overall complexity is greatly reduced. Remarkably, regardless of the general convergence order of the numerical method, we can choose a uniform time-step size independent of tolerated error and evolution time for sufficiently accurate simulation. Furthermore, with the boundary cancellation condition where the continuous diabatic errors are exponentially suppressed, we provide strong evidence for a superpolynomial convergence of first-order Trotter with uniform time-step size. We apply our analysis to the example of adiabatic unstructured search and show several preferable features of the Trotterized adiabatic approach: It can match the Grover lower bound, it does not require knowledge of the number of marked states, and its performance can be asymptotically comparable with that of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.

arXiv:2509.00171•Physical Review Research•Oct 2, 2026•0 citations

Alternative adiabatic quantum dynamics with algorithmic applications

Joseph Cunningham, Jérémie Roland

In adiabatic quantum computing the aim is to track an eigenstate as the Hamiltonian changes. In the usual setup this is achieved using the natural time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution of the system and the main technical tool is the adiabatic theorem. We propose several alternative processes that achieve the same goal, but can easily be implemented on a gate-based quantum computer without the overhead of simulating time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution. We give a general framework for deriving `adiabatic' theorems for these processes. As an application, we give various algorithms for solving the Quantum Linear Systems Problem (QLSP) with optimal scaling in the condition number. One of these algorithms was previously developed in [Cunningham, Roland 2024] and another can be seen as a randomised version of the discrete adiabatic algorithm of [Costa et al. 2022]. We also describe versions of Trotterisation in our framework, which allows several results from [An et al. 2025] to be reproduced in a randomised setting. In particular, bounds on the Trotter error in terms of the fidelity are obtained that are asymptotically better than the standard bounds.

quant-pharXiv:2605.30110•May 29, 2026•0 citations

Adiabatic Quantum Computation

Friederike Anna Dziemba

The quantum adiabatic theorem ensures that a slowly changing system, initially prepared in its ground state, will evolve to its final ground state with arbitrary precision. As a first result this thesis extends the original theorem to projection operators keeping the statement valid for Hamiltonians with degenerate ground spaces. Yet the main focus of this work lies in studying the efficiency of quantum circuit simulations by adabatic quantum computation. The standard Hamiltonian construction by Kitaev is based on a path graph reflecting the $L$ computation steps and influencing the scaling of the necessary evolution time by its spectral gap of $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{L^2}\right)$. Aspiring to an improved running time we generalize Kitaev's Hamiltonian to so-called standard graph Hamiltonians based on graph families with a different spectral gap. In this generalized construction the first two time derivatives of the Hamiltonian and the fraction of initial vertices appear as additional parameters of running time. In a first step the time derivatives can be proven to be constant. Expansion results from spectral graph theory however impose a trade-off between the spectral gap and the fraction of initial vertices as well as the fraction of final vertices which corresponds to the probability for obtaining the correct computational output. Graphs with spectral gap $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{L^k}\right)$, $k<2$, turn out to contradict very likely, graphs with $k<1$ even for sure at least one of the efficiency criterias for running time, output probability or Hamiltonian implementation. The above results may also be obstacles for a possible quantum PCP-theorem in complexity theory claiming the local Hamiltonian problem with constant gap to be QMA-complete since the very same Kitaev Hamiltonian is constructed in the QMA-hardness proof for the Local Hamiltonian problem.

arXiv:1610.04708•Oct 15, 2016•1 citation

One bound to rule them all: from Adiabatic to Zeno

Daniel Klaus Burgarth, Paolo Facchi A, Giovanni Gramegna +1 more

We derive a universal nonperturbative bound on the distance between unitary evolutions generated by time-dependent Hamiltonians in terms of the difference of their integral actions. We apply our result to provide explicit error bounds for the rotating-wave approximation and generalize it beyond the qubit case. We discuss the error of the rotating-wave approximation over long time and in the presence of time-dependent amplitude modulation. We also show how our universal bound can be used to derive and to generalize other known theorems such as the strong-coupling limit, the adiabatic theorem, and product formulas, which are relevant to quantum-control strategies including the Zeno control and the dynamical decoupling. Finally, we prove generalized versions of the Trotter product formula, extending its validity beyond the standard scaling assumption.

arXiv:2111.08961•Quantum•Jun 14, 2022•35 citations
I present a short approach to discretizing continuous unitary evolution. It gives a correspondence in both directions between continuous unitary evolutions and products of unitaries in finite dimensions, and I use it to reduce discrete adiabatic theorems to continuous ones. At fine steps, holding truncated samples of a regulated Hamiltonian on a suitable finite partition gives an approximating product. Conversely, rounding the clock identifies a product of TTT unit-step samples with a continuous evolution, up to two half-step phases. I bound its operator-norm distance from the original evolution by O(1/T)O(1/T)O(1/T) through cancellation within each time step. This assumes bounded first and second derivatives, bounded spectral width, and eigenvalue differences bounded away from nonzero multiples of 2π2π2π, uniformly in TTT. For a unitary walk with these derivative bounds, a fixed common free spectral arc supplies a Hermitian logarithm path satisfying the comparison hypotheses. Continuous simulation guarantees then transfer to the phase-corrected product, and continuous adiabatic bounds to the product itself, with an explicit additive O(1/T)O(1/T)O(1/T) error and each adiabatic theorem's hypotheses retained. For positive definite quantum linear systems of condition number κκκ, this comparison and continuous adiabatic theory give a rescaled qubitized walk with O(κ/δ)O(κ/δ)O(κ/δ) steps for leakage δδδ, matching the scaling previously obtained through a discrete adiabatic theorem. These products need no discrete adiabatic theorem.
Quantum dynamics is usually written relative to a smooth external time parameter, while actual control schedules often contain waits, pulses, gates, resets, and event-like interventions. This paper develops the first unitary part of a sigma-time quantum dynamics framework. We define a bounded-Hamiltonian quantum evolution over a finite-horizon bounded-variation sigma clock with a continuous clock component, flat clock intervals, and a locally finite set of atom times carrying unitary gates. Under these hypotheses the sigma-chronological product exists, is unitary, composes as an evolution family, conserves wave-function norm, is strongly continuous away from atom times, and obeys a sharp atom/gate insertion law. We also prove a fixed-clock perturbation estimate and a bounded isolated-pulse corridor in which shrinking finite-width pulses converge in operator norm to declared atomic gates. The result is deliberately scoped: it does not claim an unbounded Schroedinger-operator theorem, a measurement theorem, an open-system theorem, or a Zeno limit theorem. A finite qubit benchmark with two bounded waits and one atomic gate is included as a reproducibility appendix and verifies unitary defect, trace preservation, Choi positivity, and output-state validity to machine precision
Recently, several approaches to solving linear systems on a quantum computer have been formulated in terms of the quantum adiabatic theorem for a continuously varying Hamiltonian.Such approaches have enabled near-linear scaling in the condition number κ of the linear system, without requiring a complicated variable-time amplitude amplification procedure.However, the most efficient of those procedures is still asymptotically suboptimal by a factor of log(κ).Here, we prove a rigorous form of the adiabatic theorem that bounds the error in terms of the spectral gap for intrinsically discrete-time evolutions.In combination with the qubitized quantum walk, our discrete adiabatic theorem gives a speed-up for all adiabatic algorithms.Here, we use this combination to develop a quantum algorithm for solving linear systems that is asymptotically optimal, in the sense that the complexity is strictly linear in κ, matching a known lower bound on the complexity.Our O[κ log(1/ )] complexity is also optimal in terms of the combined scaling in κ and the precision .Compared to existing suboptimal methods, our algorithm is simpler and easier to implement.Moreover, we determine the constant factors in the algorithm, which would be suitable for determining the complexity in terms of gate counts for specific applications.
Adiabatic quantum computing is a general framework for preparing eigenstates of Hamiltonians on quantum devices. However, its digital implementation requires an efficient Hamiltonian simulation subroutine, which may introduce extra computational overhead or complicated quantum control logic. In this work, we show that the time-step sizes in time discretization can be much larger than expected, and the overall complexity is greatly reduced. Remarkably, regardless of the general convergence order of the numerical method, we can choose a uniform time-step size independent of tolerated error and evolution time for sufficiently accurate simulation. Furthermore, with the boundary cancellation condition where the continuous diabatic errors are exponentially suppressed, we provide strong evidence for a superpolynomial convergence of first-order Trotter with uniform time-step size. We apply our analysis to the example of adiabatic unstructured search and show several preferable features of the Trotterized adiabatic approach: It can match the Grover lower bound, it does not require knowledge of the number of marked states, and its performance can be asymptotically comparable with that of the quantum approximate optimization algorithm.
In adiabatic quantum computing the aim is to track an eigenstate as the Hamiltonian changes. In the usual setup this is achieved using the natural time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution of the system and the main technical tool is the adiabatic theorem. We propose several alternative processes that achieve the same goal, but can easily be implemented on a gate-based quantum computer without the overhead of simulating time-dependent Hamiltonian evolution. We give a general framework for deriving `adiabatic' theorems for these processes. As an application, we give various algorithms for solving the Quantum Linear Systems Problem (QLSP) with optimal scaling in the condition number. One of these algorithms was previously developed in [Cunningham, Roland 2024] and another can be seen as a randomised version of the discrete adiabatic algorithm of [Costa et al. 2022]. We also describe versions of Trotterisation in our framework, which allows several results from [An et al. 2025] to be reproduced in a randomised setting. In particular, bounds on the Trotter error in terms of the fidelity are obtained that are asymptotically better than the standard bounds.
The quantum adiabatic theorem ensures that a slowly changing system, initially prepared in its ground state, will evolve to its final ground state with arbitrary precision. As a first result this thesis extends the original theorem to projection operators keeping the statement valid for Hamiltonians with degenerate ground spaces. Yet the main focus of this work lies in studying the efficiency of quantum circuit simulations by adabatic quantum computation. The standard Hamiltonian construction by Kitaev is based on a path graph reflecting the LLL computation steps and influencing the scaling of the necessary evolution time by its spectral gap of O(1L2)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{L^2}\right)O(L21​). Aspiring to an improved running time we generalize Kitaev's Hamiltonian to so-called standard graph Hamiltonians based on graph families with a different spectral gap. In this generalized construction the first two time derivatives of the Hamiltonian and the fraction of initial vertices appear as additional parameters of running time. In a first step the time derivatives can be proven to be constant. Expansion results from spectral graph theory however impose a trade-off between the spectral gap and the fraction of initial vertices as well as the fraction of final vertices which corresponds to the probability for obtaining the correct computational output. Graphs with spectral gap O(1Lk)\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{L^k}\right)O(Lk1​), k<2k<2k<2, turn out to contradict very likely, graphs with k<1k<1k<1 even for sure at least one of the efficiency criterias for running time, output probability or Hamiltonian implementation. The above results may also be obstacles for a possible quantum PCP-theorem in complexity theory claiming the local Hamiltonian problem with constant gap to be QMA-complete since the very same Kitaev Hamiltonian is constructed in the QMA-hardness proof for the Local Hamiltonian problem.
We derive a universal nonperturbative bound on the distance between unitary evolutions generated by time-dependent Hamiltonians in terms of the difference of their integral actions. We apply our result to provide explicit error bounds for the rotating-wave approximation and generalize it beyond the qubit case. We discuss the error of the rotating-wave approximation over long time and in the presence of time-dependent amplitude modulation. We also show how our universal bound can be used to derive and to generalize other known theorems such as the strong-coupling limit, the adiabatic theorem, and product formulas, which are relevant to quantum-control strategies including the Zeno control and the dynamical decoupling. Finally, we prove generalized versions of the Trotter product formula, extending its validity beyond the standard scaling assumption.